Who Else Thinks Their Spouse Committed Marriage Fraud?

[MzAllen 8]

Just now, Lucky Cat said:

It seems you and he provided some very good evidence to convince the consulate that your relationship was legitimate. 

No it wasn't all on me because he was denied at initially, then the embassy official pulled strings...

[davidvs 320]

1 minute ago, MzAllen said:

You are correct, and it's the government too because he was flagged in the system previously for trying to pull the same thing. 

Did you know this beforehand?

Presumably yes, since you would need to know his whole immigration history to process the paperwork... This should have made you wary of his intentions in the first place.

 

[mushroomspore 3,043]

2 minutes ago, MzAllen said:

No it wasn't all on me because he was denied at initially, then the embassy official pulled strings...

So the embassy official was corrupt? And you knew about your ex's history at the time of the immigration process? Yet you still decided to marry him and successfully brought him into the US? You're an adult. You made that decision. It is not the government's job to "protect your best interests". That phrase does not appear anywhere in USCIS' policy manual either.

 

2 minutes ago, MzAllen said:

There is an old adage, If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything!!!! Thanks and have a happy life!!!!

It's against TOS to tell members to not post/say anything in your thread. And none of those people are saying mean things. They're pointing out facts. And facts are what lawyers and courts care about, btw, since you are hellbent on a "lawsuit". 

Edited February 24, 2021 by mushroomspore

[Crazy Cat 39,267]

2 minutes ago, MzAllen said:

There is an old adage, If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything!!!! Thanks and have a happy life!!!!

There is also an old adage that says "One should read the terms of service before telling others not to post"....you have done so 3 times.

Edited February 24, 2021 by Lucky Cat

[MzAllen 8]

4 hours ago, ThomasNC1988 said:

There are problems with the system but this problem is with the people using the system. How many times have we seen the likes of a 50+ year old obese woman thinking a 20 something aspiring personal trainer from a 3rd world country is in love with them. Then when the k1 gets denied they whine and cry about how the system is unfair. So they get married and and the Cr-1 gets denied so they appeal. Finally lover boy gets his greencard on the appeal because the US government is out of ways to stop this mess. Young guy comes to America, gets his greencard then disappears. *shock* It's not just women getting had this way, it's men too, probably even more so but I don't think they are as quick to get online and admit it. Use common sense and ask yourself if this person had the same means I do would they be interested in me. Then decide if you're okay with whatever the answer to that question is. There is nothing the government can do to stop people being blinded by love/lust.
 

There is an old adage, If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything!!!! Thanks and have a happy life!!!!

[OlgaA 67]

3 hours ago, ThomasNC1988 said:

There are problems with the system but this problem is with the people using the system. How many times have we seen the likes of a 50+ year old obese woman thinking a 20 something aspiring personal trainer from a 3rd world country is in love with them. Then when the k1 gets denied they whine and cry about how the system is unfair. So they get married and and the Cr-1 gets denied so they appeal. Finally lover boy gets his greencard on the appeal because the US government is out of ways to stop this mess. Young guy comes to America, gets his greencard then disappears. *shock* It's not just women getting had this way, it's men too, probably even more so but I don't think they are as quick to get online and admit it. Use common sense and ask yourself if this person had the same means I do would they be interested in me. Then decide if you're okay with whatever the answer to that question is. There is nothing the government can do to stop people being blinded by love/lust.
 

I agree. I just want to add if a person you meet online first ask about your income, property and are you an American citizen it's big no to continue relationships, I mean it's normal to ask what profession you have and who do you live with but at the beginning if they ask you details of income and property is not a good sign. I see many women on Facebook who ask about bringing 20 years old guys to states when they are 50 and people give them advises and wish happiness, the same old men and young women, people don't understand or they understand but they are afraid of loneliness and just pay for that, I wonder to know the answer.

[Crazy Cat 39,267]

4 minutes ago, MzAllen said:

No it wasn't all on me because he was denied at initially, then the embassy official pulled strings...

I have never seen a denial reversed without actions by the petitioner and beneficiary to overcome that denial.

[mushroomspore 3,043]

1 minute ago, MzAllen said:

There is an old adage, If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything!!!! Thanks and have a happy life!!!!

If you're just gonna keep repeating this and don't like what people have to say, why not go talk to an actual lawyer about your desired lawsuit? No ethical or competent lawyer will take the case btw. If a lawyer does take it, they're just gonna grift you out of your money.

[ThomasNC1988 762]

I keep hearing about this lawsuit? What would be the damages? Emotional distress they caused by not breaking up your marriage? This is insanity.

[aaron2020 11,651]

2 minutes ago, MzAllen said:

There is an old adage, If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything!!!! Thanks and have a happy life!!!!

You haven't had anything good to say about your ex who is long gone and it's still eating at you.  Doesn't seem like you're having a happy life.

While I am sympathic to your plight, you are blaming everyone else for your problems and your hurt.

It's the US Government's fault for giving you what you asked for - a visa and green card for your spouse.  They should have denied him a visa.  If they had denied his visa, you would have sued because it's not right to keep a husband from his wife.  

There's no winning with some people.  It's always someone else's fault.  
 

Take responsibility that you when through the entire immigration process asserting to the US Government that your relationship was legitimate.  You pursued the case.  No one forced you to do it.

[Crazy Cat 39,267]

Sometimes, we have to just pick ourselves up, brush off the dust, and move on with our lives.  Life is too short to be miserable......Good luck, OP.  I hope you find peace soon.

[mushroomspore 3,043]

2 minutes ago, aaron2020 said:

You haven't had anything good to say about your ex who is long gone and it's still eating at you.  Doesn't seem like you're having a happy life.

While I am sympathic to your plight, you are blaming everyone else for your problems and your hurt.

It's the US Government's fault for giving you what you asked for - a visa and green card for your spouse.  They should have denied him a visa.  If they had denied his visa, you would have sued because it's not right to keep a husband from his wife.  

There's no winning with some people.  It's always someone else's fault.  
 

Take responsibility that you when through the entire immigration process asserting to the US Government that your relationship was legitimate.  You pursued the case.  No one forced you to do it.

And OP knew about her ex's sketchy past and intentions, apparently.

[Boiler 43,451]

Federal sovereign immunity

The federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued anywhere in the United States unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. The United States has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent, mainly through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which waives the immunity if a tortious act of a federal employee causes damage, and the Tucker Act, which waives the immunity over claims arising out of contracts to which the federal government is a party.^[52] The United States as a sovereign is immune from suit unless it unequivocally consents to being sued. The United States Supreme Court in Price v. United States observed: "It is an axiom of our jurisprudence. The government is not liable to suit unless it consents thereto, and its liability in suit cannot be extended beyond the plain language of the statute authorizing it." Price v. United States, 174 U.S. 373, 375-76 (1899).

[milimelo 4,208]

25 minutes ago, MzAllen said:

There is an old adage, If you don't have anything good to say, don't say anything!!!! Thanks and have a happy life!!!!

~Moderator warning that you can’t prevent others from posting. Read the TOS. Another post telling a member not to post will get you an administrative action. ~ 

[Ontarkie 13,917]

~~Thread locked for review.~~