Ywjammin30

They paid your tuition so they don't freely give waivers in those cases. The whole point of funding you was so you could return home and contribute to that society. But you seem to also have overstayed your visa which is another issue on top of that. 

Once again.....How does this relate to immigration?  Is he a Green Card holder?  a US citizen?

It doesn't involve you unless you are the US spouse.  Are you?

You could inform his US spouse....

It means exactly what it says. The last time it was updated. Just wait, administrative processing can take a long time, but typically is a week or 2. Depends on a number of factors. 

I like this cover letter a lot.  Clear and concise.  It's just a table of contents, or checklist, if you will.  It is not required and may not even be read or kept in the file.

Why did you even think you can go to do valunteering work for a whole year in the USA, using a tourist visa?
 
Sorry not sorry, your chances of ever getting a b2 visa are less than 1%. And even if you get it I bet they will not admit you on the border anyway. 
 
I bet you didnt mention on your first b2 application that you're planning on volunteering for a year either. That's another issue. 
 
Some people... 

Expect a HUGE amount of scrutiny. This marriage shuffle is well know to consular officers at embassies around the world. Happily married couple in foreign country divorce, one party marries an American, immigrates, stays married long enough to get GC (and possibly citizenship), divorces USC spouse and remarries patiently-waiting original spouse in home country to bring her to the USA. 
 
Why else would anyone re-marry a spouse who not only couldn’t stay married to you but couldn’t stay married to someone else either? 

I tried to ask this in a hidden way but damn! You came right out and asked it! 😄

My apology for using the term waiver.  I shouldn't have typed that.

She's in the middle of ROC.  She hasn't been an LPR for 5 years.  She gained her green card through marriage.  She will need to provide "clear and convincing evidence" that the first marriage was not a way to evade US immigration laws.  

Well in that case she doesn’t meet the 5-year requirement. One might even speculate that it’s one of those cases why the 5-year requirement exists.

Sounds like OP is in ROC process in another thread. Already thinking of the next marriage? 

Expect a lot scrutiny is an understatement.
 
ETA... @Jerron305 let me elaborate on why there would be a lot of scrutiny. It is because this could be seen as an attempt to bring over the sister faster than the normal process. Normally it would take 15 years or more for your ex-wife to bring her sister here to the US as a sibling. You divorcing your ex wife and immediately marrying her sister would obviously allow her sister to come here faster. Immigration is trying to crack down on fraud so the officer may be very hard on your case. We are not saying that your relationship and circumstance is not genuine. We are just saying that you have to overcome suspicions of fraud. And if there is anything that makes an officer suspicious s/he can deny your case. Especially for a K1. Because for a K1 you two are not technically married yet so the whole thing could be made up. 
 
Best advice is to be prepared.

Curious as to how long the first marriage lasted.

Freudian slip?

She'll need to attend. Your cases are two separate things. They will likely ask her questions. 

Assuming you didn’t look at the consulate reviews?😮
https://www.visajourney.com/reviews/index.php?cnty=Jamaica
 
 

In other thread OP suggested she's not in the US yet and wanted to know if she can expedite because her fiance thinks about joining the military... The other post is a mess and OP really doesn't know what she/he wants and also is very, very confused on how immigration works.

When filing under a waiver of the joint filing requirement, your 'window' opens immediately upon your divorce being final.

This is a judgment call assessing risk.  You keep asking questions without providing enough information to give more than speculation as answers.  If her father or brother, uncle etc. were legitimately on a watch list, yes, it can reflect on her risk assessment.  Without more facts, we are only speculating.

Yes. Same here hoping for AP to change to issued this week. I even dreamt it today. Praying for good news for all of us. 

Yes, they will review past visa applications, including possibly any notes from the CO when he interviewed for it.
If he marked that he was married, then he will need to present documentation that the marriage was dissolved. If he wasn't actually married, providing that documentation is impossible. There would also very likely be a misrepresentation inadmissibility.
Never lie to anybody in immigration or on any immigration forms.

My edits in red. 

The are actually living together....in...Europe.  Your concerns might be valid if it was Ghana and they weren't living together.  Advise of value always considers the actual CIRCUMSTANCES.

Here it is:
 
9 FAM 504.11-2(A)  (U) Visa Issued or Refused if Application Properly Completed and Executed
(CT:VISA-1;   11-18-2015)
a. (U) There are no exceptions to the rule that once a visa application has been properly completed and executed before a consular officer, a visa must be either issued or refused.  (See 9 FAM 504.9-2.)  For statistical and comparison purposes, all posts should follow the identical refusal procedures and report refusals the same way in their required reports of visas issued and refused.  (See 9 FAM 504.3-2.)  Accordingly, any alien to whom a visa is not issued by the end of the working day on which the application is made, or by the end of the next working day if it is normal post procedure to issue visas to some or all applicants the following day, must be found ineligible under one or more provisions of INA 212(a), 212(e), or 221(g). (INA 221(g) is not to be used when a provision of INA 212(a) is applicable.)  This requirement to find an applicant ineligible when a visa is not issued applies even when:
(1)  (U) A case is medically deferred;
(2)  (U) The post requests an advisory opinion from the Department;
(3)  (U) The post decides to make additional local inquiries or conduct a full investigation; or
(4)  (U) The only deficiency is a clearance from another post. 
b. (U) There is no such thing as an informal refusal or a pending case once a formal application has been made.