Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
  • Posts

    39,945
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

pushbrk last won the day on December 1 2024

pushbrk had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Dumaguete

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Other
  • Place benefits filed at
    California Service Center
  • Local Office
    Spokane WA
  • Country
    China
  • Our Story
    The marriage associated with immigration ended after 12 years.

Immigration Timeline & Photos

pushbrk's Achievements

Recent Profile Visitors

78,180 profile views
  1. This is an online filing. Your advice is correct for a paper filing.
  2. If you have an "offer letter" that states your salary once in the USA, then that can be your stated "current income" that you are using to qualify. Converting what you are making now, is also correct. Just include the letter from your employer indicating the transfer and associated income.
  3. That link is for those visa applicants (not petitioners) who are currently in the USA. This potential visa applicant has already left the USA. The waiver needed in this case, definitely shouts lawyer, not just any immigration lawyer but one who specializes in waivers of ineligibility. Note also that any waiver based on hardship to the US Citizens needs to be about a lot more than the inconvenience of waiting out the ban.
  4. They may prioritize a bit but the difference in timeline to petition approval has never been that noticeable. It certainly won't take three years.
  5. Totality of circumstances is always the key here. If there's a steady employment history with clearly well over the income requirement, and only a short period of unemployment followed by a new job with good income, I would expect success. You can really wait as long as you want during the NVC process but contacting them at least once a year. Of course, in that case, we aren't talking about a short term unemployment.
  6. By that time, he'll be reminding NVC, not USCIS. Petition approvals are the same timeline for LPRs as for US Citizens. The extra wait is at NVC.
  7. Contract yes, and just one most recent pay stub. You are not required to have qualifying income for any of the previous years. Current income is king here.
  8. It's not all or nothing. I mentioned four separate red flags. The cultural norms are part of the totality of circumstances that will be evaluated. Best to stop trying to explain, and simply arrange to spend enough time together that the time will overcome the red flags. Of course you have excuses. Everybody does. Just get it done.
  9. Her sending money to you is not a plus. My advice is not to mention it.
  10. Might be sufficient, but the year you sponsor an immigrant is not a good year to file an extension. That they did so, does not prevent them from filing now though. Note that your current income would be calculated by taking the gross pay for one pay period times the number of pay periods in a full years. 1k a week is 52k, for example. That's how YOU state YOUR current income. It does NOT come from any tax return. Those are separated sections and answers unless self employed.
  11. Seems the OP disappeared, but definitely do not marry again. You would have to fraudulently state you are free to marry. If this is about shortcutting a name change that wasn't already done, just abandon that idea and get driver license in the name on her passport and green card. Further, a new immigrant does not need a State issued Real ID to travel domestically. Their passport is real ID enough.
  12. Just a quick read, makes me think the form may have been signed in the right place. Make sure it's signed where it says "Sponsor's Signature". Second, yes a current pay stub documents current income. This kind of RFE "properly completed" etc. usually means there's an error, not just an omission.
  13. It didn't matter. You could have logged in as the petitioner each time, with no issues.
  14. Correct answer above. It comes in a booklet. Upload including front cover, as a single PDF file.
  15. OK. Either of you could have done that, or both.
×
×
  • Create New...