Jump to content
kshoemoney

Has anyone used WebWed Mobile for getting married for their CR-1/IR-1?

 Share

71 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Haiti
Timeline

Overthinking. Meet in person and get married. Easiest way.

Our K1 Journey    I-129f

Service Center : Texas Service Center   Transferred? California Service Center on 8/11/14

Consulate : Port au Prince, Haiti             I-129F Sent : 4/14/2014

I-129F NOA1 : 4/24/14                            I-129F NOA2 : 9/10/14

NVC Received : 9/24/14                          NVC Left : 9/26/14

Consulate Received : 10/6/14 CEAC status changed to ready

Packet 3 Received : 10/27/14 packet received by petitioner in USA ( beneficiary never received packet 3)

Medical: 10/30/14 Dr. Buteau                  Medical picked up: 11/3/14

Packet 3 Sent : 11/10/13.. Had to schedule interview appointment and attach confirmation receipt to packet

Interview Date : 12/1/14                           Interview Result : Approved !

Visa Received : 12/10/14 picked up at Jacmel location

US Entry : 12/15/14 Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Apply for Social Security Card: 12/30/14 Connecticut

Marriage: 1/26/15

 

Adjustment of Status

CIS Office : Hartford                                  Filed : 3/18/15

NOA : 3/25/15                                            Biometrics : 4/15/15

Approved: 8/31/15                                     Received: 9/8/15

 

EAD

CIS Office : Hartford                                  Filed : 3/18/15

NOA : 3/25/15                                            Approved: 6/12/15

Received: 6/20/15

 

Removal of Conditions I-751

Filed: 8/14/17 at VSC                                 NOA: 8/15/17 Received 8/21 by mail

Biometrics: Dated: 8/25/17   Received 9/2/17   Appointment 9/11/17 

Approved: 10/23/18 -no interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

Could always file a K1, as you have met within 2 years it seems like, and have proof of the meeting. Just throwing that out there. Now I will wait for the bashing to begin on me suggesting a K1. I'm just stating an option, so please, have mercy. LOL.

Edited by Loren Y

Here on a K1? Need married and a Certificate in hand within a few hours? I'm here to help. Come to Vegas and I'll marry you Vegas style!!   Visa Journey members are always FREE for my services. I know the costs involved in this whole game of immigration, and if I can save you some money I will!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Loren Y said:

Could always file a K1, as you have met within 2 years it seem like, and have proof of the meeting. Just throwing that out there. Now I will wait for the bashing to begin on me suggesting a K1. I'm just stating an option, so please, have mercy. LOL.

Haha yeah, we did think of that, but the 8+ month period without work while awaiting AOS is a tough pill to swallow.

 

37 minutes ago, James120383 said:

completely illegal with regards to immigration and US law 

I am really open to being proven wrong, but from the second-hand info that I've been able to find online, these weddings do appear to be legal and they are not legally considered proxy weddings, as you are both present (virtually) for the ceremony. I am still very skeptical of how USCIS would see them, but someone on reddit who actually got married with this service called the county clerk from the county that issued their license (Utah County, Utah), and the clerk confirmed that it is valid as they have very open marriage laws there (apparently there is no requirement that you are physically present for the ceremony). I am sure USCIS would have a thing or two say about it and it probably is very risky to try to get a visa with one, but they do not appear to be illegal marriages, as far as I can tell. Again tho, I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kshoemoney said:

Haha yeah, we did think of that, but the 8+ month period without work while awaiting AOS is a tough pill to swallow.

 

I am really open to being proven wrong, but from the second-hand info that I've been able to find online, these weddings do appear to be legal and they are not legally considered proxy weddings, as you are both present (virtually) for the ceremony. I am still very skeptical of how USCIS would see them, but someone on reddit who actually got married with this service called the county clerk from the county that issued their license (Utah County, Utah), and the clerk confirmed that it is valid as they have very open marriage laws there (apparently there is no requirement that you are physically present for the ceremony). I am sure USCIS would have a thing or two say about it and it probably is very risky to try to get a visa with one, but they do not appear to be illegal marriages, as far as I can tell. Again tho, I could be wrong.

How is that not a proxy?  It totally is.  "Virtual" is not "in-person."  Same reason people who "date" online for years are not exempt from the K-1 meeting requirement.

 

If you insist on doing that, please do return and let us know what USCIS has to say about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline

Ridiculous as it may sound, it really is possible to be too married for a fiancee visa and not married enough for a spouse visa.  In a US immigration context, any such marriage will put you in that category until you have evidence you've been together in person BEFORE the I-130 is filed. Both otherwise "legal" and "non-legal" marriages can put a couple in this circumstance.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Vietnam (no flag)
Timeline
1 hour ago, kshoemoney said:

Haha yeah, we did think of that, but the 8+ month period without work while awaiting AOS is a tough pill to swallow.

 

I am really open to being proven wrong, but from the second-hand info that I've been able to find online, these weddings do appear to be legal and they are not legally considered proxy weddings, as you are both present (virtually) for the ceremony. I am still very skeptical of how USCIS would see them, but someone on reddit who actually got married with this service called the county clerk from the county that issued their license (Utah County, Utah), and the clerk confirmed that it is valid as they have very open marriage laws there (apparently there is no requirement that you are physically present for the ceremony). I am sure USCIS would have a thing or two say about it and it probably is very risky to try to get a visa with one, but they do not appear to be illegal marriages, as far as I can tell. Again tho, I could be wrong.

The definition of a proxy wedding is that one party is not physically present at the wedding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
1 hour ago, kshoemoney said:

Haha yeah, we did think of that, but the 8+ month period without work while awaiting AOS is a tough pill to swallow.

 

I am really open to being proven wrong, but from the second-hand info that I've been able to find online, these weddings do appear to be legal and they are not legally considered proxy weddings, as you are both present (virtually) for the ceremony. I am still very skeptical of how USCIS would see them, but someone on reddit who actually got married with this service called the county clerk from the county that issued their license (Utah County, Utah), and the clerk confirmed that it is valid as they have very open marriage laws there (apparently there is no requirement that you are physically present for the ceremony). I am sure USCIS would have a thing or two say about it and it probably is very risky to try to get a visa with one, but they do not appear to be illegal marriages, as far as I can tell. Again tho, I could be wrong.

You are confusing state law with federal law.  No different than cannabis being legal in some states, but still illegal under federal law.   In addition,  this is nothing new.  Montana has been doing it for years.

 

However,  even though it is recognized by the or a state,  it still is NOT recognized federally for immigration purposes.   

Edited by payxibka

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kshoemoney said:

So, if we were to use it get married, and then find a way to meet up and “consummate” the marriage, wouldn’t that fulfill the USCIS requirement?

Yes. But then why not just get married normally anywhere? You would be making things more complicated than it needs to be.

 

1 hour ago, aaron2020 said:

The definition of a proxy wedding is that one party is not physically present at the wedding.  

Well technically, it refers to a marriage where at least one individual acts as a proxy for a spouse-to-be who is not physically present. The term dates back long before live video streaming was a consideration.

The interpretation by USCIS and DOS, at least as stated in their policy manuals, just doesn't differentiate them.

 

5 hours ago, pushbrk said:

Technically, proxy marriages that have been consummated will fulfil the requirements, but I've seen nothing but problems with this over the years.  If you can see each other after marriage and before filing the petition, then you can probably also get married when you are together to consummate the marriage.  Doing it that way will avoid headaches later.

 

Google Proxy Marriage US Spouse visa and see what kind of stories you read.  You are not likely to find encouragement.

I 110% agree that just marrying in person is by far the best option here. It's just adding extra requirements (documenting that it was consummated, or at least reasonable could have been, in person after meeting) and unnecessary questions.

 

That said, I'm going to play devil's advocate here for just a sec with the terminology...

WebWed claims that this is not a proxy marriage by definition. There is nobody acting as a proxy. I've seen one of their marriages conducting live, and can veriyf there was nobody acting as a proxy.

The marriage license (and subsequent certificate) can be issued by a US authority permitted to issue them, and can be done so in the same manner as if the individuals were physically int he same place.

Specifically, I know they have at least successfully arranged for the court clerk in Utah county (yes - Utah county in the state of Utah!) to issue a valid marriage license - after verifying identity of the individuals via a document verification system - identical to that as they would issue to people who were both physically in front of them. They were fully aware that neither party were physically in the presence of each other and stated it was fine.


THAT SAID - bolded and caps as I cannot overstate this enough...

The wording in INA 101(a)(35) - https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1101&num=0&edition=prelim -  states:

Quote

The term "spouse", "wife", or "husband" do not include a spouse, wife, or husband by reason of any marriage ceremony where the contracting parties thereto are not physically present in the presence of each other, unless the marriage shall have been consummated.

The phrase "physically present" is used, not specifically "proxy marriage". So their services clearly would not meet this requirement for US immigration purposes.

 

Side story...

I follow a local attorney as he covers various legal topics who went through all early this month and used their services. Note that he is NOT an immigration attorney, but did do research into the process.

The main difference is he was using it as a means to be exempt from a travel ban into an EU country as a spouse of a citizen/resident there. I'm guessing the EU definition is less strict here than the US. Had his new spouse wanted to come to the US instead - before consummation of the marriage - he would have been in for a world of pain.

Then again...I have not seen him post a successful entry into the country yet video or tweet, nor any issues that could arise later in the process once the details are discovered (airline staff and border agents likely will take the MC at face value).

 

Edit::

Just saw the OP's note mentioning the Utah County, Utah thing as well. I'm like 99% confident these ultimately go back to the same person.

 

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, geowrian said:

Yes. But then why not just get married normally anywhere? You would be making things more complicated than it needs to be.

 

Due to the travel bans and that we are a same-sex couple, our only open options to get gay married right now are probably Mexico and the UK. Neither is a great options as, supposing we get thru a port of entry in one of those countries, there a few other hoops to get through before we could get married. So if there was a way as simple as getting married online, it could make sense to take it. That said, we don't want to risk wasting a year in processing only to find out they don't recognize our marriage. It is perhaps possible to use WebWed to get married and then use that to get me into visit Italy to consummate the marriage, then file the petition. But I think i need to talk to an attorney to figure out the best option.

 

Thanks for all your comments though, they were really helpful.

Edited by kshoemoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, kshoemoney said:

Due to the travel bans and that we are a same-sex couple, our only open options to get gay married right now are probably Mexico and the UK. Neither is a great options as, supposing we get thru a port of entry in one of those countries, there a few other hoops to get through before we could get married. So if there was a way as simple as getting married online, it could make sense to take it. That said, we don't want to risk wasting a year in processing only to find out they don't recognize our marriage. It is perhaps possible to use WebWed to get married and then use that to get me into visit Italy to consummate the marriage, then file the petition. But I think i need to talk to an attorney to figure out the best option.

 

Thanks for all your comments though, they were really helpful.

Have you looked into Gibraltar or Denmark or Iceland?  Those countries are often cited here on VJ as being relatively 'easy' in terms of red tape for two foreigners to marry.  And I'm not sure about Gibraltar, but same-sex marriage is legal in Denmark and Iceland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

Have you looked into Gibraltar or Denmark or Iceland?  Those countries are often cited here on VJ as being relatively 'easy' in terms of red tape for two foreigners to marry.  And I'm not sure about Gibraltar, but same-sex marriage is legal in Denmark and Iceland.

I cannot enter those countries at the moment AFAIK because I am in the U.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
1 hour ago, kshoemoney said:

I cannot enter those countries at the moment AFAIK because I am in the U.S.

Lots of people's plans are on hold because of COVID 19 related travel restrictions.  I understand now that being same sex complicates your choices, but there WILL be available travel choices in the future, and you can avail of those choices be together in person for a marriage.  I still think that is your best choice, but do as you wish or see fit.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kshoemoney said:

I came across this service last night called WebWed Mobile that offers 100% legal marriages online and given that my boyfriend are not able to see each other right now because of COVID (I am in NYC and he is in Italy), but we want to get married, I thought that if this is legit it would be a lifesaver. I am skeptical because I haven't heard much about it, but they have been operational since 2016 and they do not do proxy marriages, but instead specialize in cyber jurisdiction and you get a traditional marriage certificate. They say they do not offer immigration legal advice, as immigration approval is more complicated than just being married, but that customers of theirs have used marriage licenses through WebWed to get spousal visas.

 

I am wondering if anyone has used this service and can speak to whether it is acceptable to use for immigration purposes? I would think if it was legit that everyone would be raving about it, but it seems like no one has heard of it. Conversely, if it was a scam I would expect to find people saying that loudly as well, but there isn't really. There are many positive reviews on reviews.io but I would love to find someone that could speak to its legitimacy for immigration purposes. I don't want to do it if it will mean USCIS doesn't look at our marriage as legitimate, but if it does work, then it would be a no brainer to do, since we could get our petition rolling now, since the travel restrictions are likely to be in place for many months in the future anyway. Also, if we were married, they would let him in to visit during covid because they allow in Spouses of U.S. citizens, I believe.

 

Thanks for your help!

Actually I'm not sure how true this is but I saw an article online about NY, apparently they signed an executive order some few months ago allowing couples to marry via the web. There's also a group on fb for long distance couples, a young lady did in fact get married lasy week via online wedweb, she published her story.. It's legit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, nics222 said:

There's also a group on fb for long distance couples, a young lady did in fact get married lasy week via online wedweb, she published her story.. It's legit.

 . . . which is fine until the USCIS says you weren't celebrating / consummating the marriage together.  States can do whatever they want but federal code, specifically immigration, won't accept / recognize marriages unless the two parties do it face to face.  Unfortunately that is how immigration looks at it.

March 2, 2018  Married In Hong Kong

April 30, 2018  Mary moves from the Philippines to Mexico, Husband has MX Permanent Residency

June 13, 2018 Mary receives Mexican Residency Card

June 15, 2018  I-130 DCF Appointment in Juarez  -  June 18, 2018  Approval E-Mail

August 2, 2018 Case Complete At Consulate

September 25, 2018 Interview in CDJ and Approved!

October 7, 2018 In the USA

October 27, 2018 Green Card received 

October 29, 2018 Applied for Social Security Card - November 5, 2018 Social Security Card received

November 6th, 2018 State ID Card Received, Applied for Global Entry - Feb 8,2019 Approved.

July 14, 2020 Removal of Conditions submitted by mail  July 12, 2021 Biometrics Completed

August 6, 2021 N-400 submitted by mail

September 7, 2021 I-751 Interview, Sept 8 Approved and Card Being Produced

October 21, 2021 N-400 Biometrics Completed  

November 30,2021  Interview, Approval and Oath

December 10, 2021 US Passport Issued

August 12, 2022 PHL Dual Nationality Re-established & Passport Approved 

April 6,2023 Legally Separated - Oh well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, Jorgedig said:

Have you looked into Gibraltar or Denmark or Iceland?  Those countries are often cited here on VJ as being relatively 'easy' in terms of red tape for two foreigners to marry.  And I'm not sure about Gibraltar, but same-sex marriage is legal in Denmark and Iceland.

Happily gay married in Gibraltar here. Can confirm it's entirely legal. 

 

@kshoemoney I don't think Gibraltar is barring entry to US citizens/residents. Just make sure to transfer in the UK when you do fly over. 

 

Just as an aside, getting married in the UK would be more difficult as you'd require a specific Visa to get married there, even if you normally do not require one as a tourist. This does not apply to Gibraltar. Gibraltar also does not require apostilles. 

Edited by Melc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...