dentsflogged

If this was allowed, lots of intending immigrants would fake job losses.  Jobs they intend to leave anyways.  Too easy to manipulate.  

It's even more expensive to have paid for a flight only to be denied entry when you arrive. Just sayin'

It's even more expensive to have paid for a flight only to be denied entry when you arrive. Just sayin'

It's even more expensive to have paid for a flight only to be denied entry when you arrive. Just sayin'

It's even more expensive to have paid for a flight only to be denied entry when you arrive. Just sayin'

Yes.    They don't even seem to mind about bags, etc, despite plenty of other offices saying that you can't take them in - there were lots of people when I was there with phones (myself included, I just turned mine off when I went into the interview area) and bags - that was earlier this week.
 
 
Case status is now showing that my card is being produced

I’m not sure how his advising you to read the AOS process is rude 🙄
 
perhaps if you actually took time to take his advise, read the requirements and help yourself like the rest of us ladies do you wouldn’t be quite so helpless.. after all, you seemed perfectly capable when it came to creating the situation, now you need to work at resolving it too. 

I would expect a lot of scrutiny... 
 
whats the plan? To get divorced one day and remarry the next? Wow surly there would be scrutiny alone about the use of E2 visa while knowingly being seperated and going through a divorce? Regardless of being under same roof 🙈 then proving legitimacy for one or both visas... talk about a bag of worms being opened

As one, I have to pipe in and say that we women of VJ are anything but 'helpless.'  Not cool, sistah.

I've been helping you.  Instead of being rude to someone helping you, maybe you should actually read the Guides so you can help yourself.  
 
This is a do-it-yourself forum.
 
Pointing you to the Guides so you can read and understand the AOS process is better than you asking random questions about different parts of the AOS process.
 
Don't play the "helpless woman" part.  That's demeaning to women.  Read the Guides and empower yourself.  

Good bye and good luck.  

 

I'm asking for the rules not your personal red flags. I support my wife and children if you see that as red flag then good for you.

Yes.    They don't even seem to mind about bags, etc, despite plenty of other offices saying that you can't take them in - there were lots of people when I was there with phones (myself included, I just turned mine off when I went into the interview area) and bags - that was earlier this week.
 
 
Case status is now showing that my card is being produced

We detected it within seconds.

Sadly your lawyer isnt as competent as you think. Happens more often than not. Just search the site for horror stories.  Most people on here got this far and further without lawyers. Good luck! 

Not true.  As an adult human, we always have choices.  You and your wife could choose to live in Pakistan instead of the US.  If being together is the important thing, then remove the US from the formula, and you have your answer.

I wonder - with all of this hardship and misery - why she just doesn’t join you in Pakistan where you could celebrate the birth together

I don't think you understand what The_Empyrean said. Read it again and slowly.

hahahahahahahahahahaha
Welcome to 2019, where "im being discriminated" doesn't work anymore
Besides, it has nothing to do with you, or your nationality. Your country has proven to be higher immigration fraud risk, thank your own country for this, don't be upset at US government trying to protect their people. 

What about financial commingling of the marriage evidence such as joint bank accounts, etc?

Quality not quantity 

No one is going to help you figure out how to stay here illegally.  

Well, you seem to have it all planned out. 

You have already made two petitions and now you want to withdraw and already thinking about a third one? ....

There's the potential to be a huge difference though.
 
Biological parents are just your DNA donors.  Plenty of people are not on speaking terms at all with them and are raised in foster or adoptive homes.  There are unfortunatley some children who are never fostered or adopted but were removed from their biological parents at a young age (I was part of the team removing a 4 day old infant from her biological parents about 10 years ago - to the best of my knowledge she has never been returned to their care - nor should she be though that is very off topic) who may simplify their life by saying "I don't have any parents" or similar.  

While I'm not pretending to know the way USCIS thinks, I've always assumed the question is twofold - first, to be able to have an accurate profile of the person seeking immigration benefit, and second, to see if there are familial ties to anyone who throws up a red flag in the system.   John Smith (probably) won't be an issue, but if there's an uncommon name that matches anyone on a watch list, then I would think that the beneficiary in that case would find themselves with a lengthy AP time while their ties to that person are proven or disproven. 
 
I daresay that 20 years from now we are going to see MANY questions like this - assisted reproduction technology is helping more and more unique families, blended families and uncommon family bonds are already blurring the lines of "what's a parent" and will only continue to muddy the (legal) water.   USCIS really should clarify exactly what they mean though - do they want biological parents, legal parents or social parents - ie: DNA donors, the people legally responsible for you, or the people who you personally see to be your parents regardless of what genetic or legal ties they have to you - because language being what it is, "parent" just doesn't hold the same meaning it did anymore and needs further clarification. 

The point of my rant is, OP - just be upfront - explain your mistake and let them decide which information they'll keep and what they'll toss. 

There's the potential to be a huge difference though.
 
Biological parents are just your DNA donors.  Plenty of people are not on speaking terms at all with them and are raised in foster or adoptive homes.  There are unfortunatley some children who are never fostered or adopted but were removed from their biological parents at a young age (I was part of the team removing a 4 day old infant from her biological parents about 10 years ago - to the best of my knowledge she has never been returned to their care - nor should she be though that is very off topic) who may simplify their life by saying "I don't have any parents" or similar.  

While I'm not pretending to know the way USCIS thinks, I've always assumed the question is twofold - first, to be able to have an accurate profile of the person seeking immigration benefit, and second, to see if there are familial ties to anyone who throws up a red flag in the system.   John Smith (probably) won't be an issue, but if there's an uncommon name that matches anyone on a watch list, then I would think that the beneficiary in that case would find themselves with a lengthy AP time while their ties to that person are proven or disproven. 
 
I daresay that 20 years from now we are going to see MANY questions like this - assisted reproduction technology is helping more and more unique families, blended families and uncommon family bonds are already blurring the lines of "what's a parent" and will only continue to muddy the (legal) water.   USCIS really should clarify exactly what they mean though - do they want biological parents, legal parents or social parents - ie: DNA donors, the people legally responsible for you, or the people who you personally see to be your parents regardless of what genetic or legal ties they have to you - because language being what it is, "parent" just doesn't hold the same meaning it did anymore and needs further clarification. 

The point of my rant is, OP - just be upfront - explain your mistake and let them decide which information they'll keep and what they'll toss.