appleblossom

Exactly, that's what Boiler meant. It doesn't apply to Pakistan now so unless things change she's got a long wait ahead of her.

When your PD becomes current on Table B of the Visa Bulletin. It's currently at 1st March 2008, so approx 16 years. Add on a bit of time for the backlog and maybe around 20 years as a very rough guess?

Yes, because as said above there's no visa number available to you, and won't be for decades. You just have to wait I'm afraid.

How is your Priority Date only a couple of weeks ago if your case is already at NVC? That doesn’t make any sense, can you check the PD again? Is it 29 Oct 2022 maybe? But as said above, it’ll be decades for you and your sister, but your parents are Immediate Relatives so they’ll be able to commence NVC processing soon and should get visas at some point in the next year or so. Your parents can then petition for you and your sister further down the line, it’ll be quicker than waiting for a sibling petition but still not quick - is your sister married? And how old is your niece?

Yes, moved here in July - also an EB applicant. Is Boston where your job/sponsor is?

Wow, impressive that you're both eligible for IV's via EB3! Good luck, I hope the Visa Bulletin speeds up for you both and you get your visas quicker than expected.

Are you the other case with the Jan PD?

Oh ok. Odd then that the processing times tool gives different times for each of the service centres. But either way there's still a lot more to it than just being from the same country, every application will be processed in order but they're not linear, as each takes a different amount of time due to numerous factors.

Being the same nationality as you isn't the only factor though. Were they all done at the same case service centre as yours? You haven't completed your VJ timeline so not sure which one your case is at, but you can see processing times here - https://egov.uscis.gov/processing-times/

He’s in AP, perfectly normal and no way of expediting it I’m afraid. They can ask for the passport to be returned if he needs to travel though. She can also look at filing a Writ of Mandamus to force a decision.

This is from the website - see Step 3. https://uploads.mwp.mprod.getusinfo.com/uploads/sites/43/2022/05/K1_Packet_September2021.pdf HTH.

Very odd, sounds like somebody has made a mistake. Current PD for visas is 1st Dec 2021, so 2.5 years, but I think Ghana has quite a long wait for interviews. Maybe 3 years? It's as good a guess as any.

Hmmm very odd. The VB sets it out clearly, she shouldn't have been asked to submit docs as her PD isn't current for filing. Does her CEAC status definitely show E3 on it? Just wondered if perhaps she's been put in the wrong category by mistake. But either way I'm not really sure how or why it matters, there's no visa available to her yet, she's still got a long wait. It's not like she's going to jump the queue and get given a visa ahead of somebody else with a current PD. Visa availability is much more strictly controlled and there simply isn't one available to her yet.

The problem she's got is that any of those ties will pale in to insignificance when it comes to the tie to her children. So I think she's got an uphill battle as it will always be assumed that she wants to stay with her children.

Are you sure that’s her PD? When was her I-140 approved?

What do you mean by 'with pressure'? Not sure what that is?

Yep. https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/fiancee-2/the-interview/

Afraid I don't know, as we applied via an employment based immigrant visa route, so we didn't have to adjust status. Once we'd had the medical done in London, that was it.

3. You only need the first Hep B to pass the medical, and can have it (and any other missing vaccines) done at the medical. Both myself and my husband had the Hep B and were fine, we got our second dose before we left the UK and then our final dose (it's only 3) is being done in the US soon. Our children (age 16 & 18) had the joint Hep A and Hep B at the medical, but be aware that they give children a different one in the US, so they can't complete the course here. We're getting their final doses done at Christmas when we return to the UK, our son needs both for travelling with school next year anyway so might as well. All 4 of us were absolutely fine after our Hep A's and B's, and we each had several other jabs at the medical too. No side effects although as a fellow needle phobe I feel your pain on that front! I'm just glad I didn't need to have a blood test as well (only our daughter did).

Bottom line is that from what you've said you don't have a valid reason for an expedite. So he needs to tell them that and either cancel the request or just wait for them to refuse it.

Are you sure? Odd that they're asking for something so specific then. So what reason did he give for an expedite?

Are you saying your Dad said you were ill as the reason for requesting an expedite but you're not? Obviously they're going to require proof of that, you're asking to jump the queue ahead of everybody else that's already waiting for an interview. If you can't provide proof then you need to be honest and cancel the expedite request. Which consulate?

OK, so if both those PD's are correct and you're trying to compare the two cases - at the moment only one may be invited to complete the NVC processing (submit docs, complete DS-260, pay fees) as only one is potentially eligible to do so under Table B of the Visa Bulletin (depending on the country). The case with a PD of 20th June 2023 isn't able to do any of that yet regardless of which country they're in. But neither are eligible for a visa yet, they've both got quite a wait ahead of them. I'd assume that both will be DQ'ed well before their PD's become current, so at that point it just becomes a case of whether the earlier PD is current first, or both become current at the same time (if there is a big leap of dates on the VB).

Neither would be in the line for an interview now anyway, as their PD’s aren’t current. But if both PD’s were current then yes, whoever is DQ’ed first would get an interview first. BTW, please just use normal type - your post was really hard to read! Thx.

There's no problem with that though, it's perfectly legal, and not immigration fraud (unless they actually intended to stay permanently when they got the F1 and entered on it of course).