The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name

[TBoneTX 43,048]

 

Here's Schiff's whistleblower, exposed by one of the best investigative journalists in the U.S.

Quote

The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name

 

By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations
October 30, 2019, 4:21 PM Eastern

 

For a town that leaks like a sieve, Washington has done an astonishingly effective job keeping from the American public the name of the anonymous “whistleblower" who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump — even though his identity is an open secret inside the Beltway. [...]

 

Continues here: https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html

 

 

[Dashinka 23,237]

Interesting.  When this whole thing started, I wondered about the whistleblower laws with respect to maintaining anonymity.  I thought the laws were in place to stop professional retribution against someone coming forward, but that the right to confront one’s accuser was still in place.

[TBoneTX 43,048]

This wasn't even a traditional whistleblower, but rather a gossiper who dealt in secondhand information.

Regardless, connected to Biden/Schiff/DNC.

Sounds like a lot o' tortfeasin' goin' on...

[Tahoma 2,291]

Thank goodness for true patriots like this whistleblower.  He's exposed yet more of Trump's bottomless corruption.  Impeachment is a slam dunk.

[cyclone27 710]

So the whistleblower is another partisan hack? No surprise there. 

[Dashinka 23,237]

3 hours ago, Tahoma said:

Thank goodness for true patriots like this whistleblower.  He's exposed yet more of Trump's bottomless corruption.  Impeachment is a slam dunk.

If he is a true patriot and not a partisan hack part of a Schiff star chamber, then come forward.  The laws will protect him from professional retribution.

[Ban Hammer 12,835]

[90DayFinancier 910]

The Whistle Blower has been made irrelevant to the process by the fact that several people with first hand knowledge have described the President's attempt to shake down a foreign country. 

 

If the house is on fire, you don't have a committee meeting to determine who pulled the alarm.

 

Republican talk points need to pivot to something relevant. The hearings are going to go forward. 

[Dashinka 23,237]

1 minute ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The Whistle Blower has been made irrelevant to the process by the fact that several people with first hand knowledge have described the President's attempt to shake down a foreign country. 

 

If the house is on fire, you don't have a committee meeting to determine who pulled the alarm.

 

Republican talk points need to pivot to something relevant. The hearings are going to go forward. 

It seems to me there are a bunch of folks that like everyone else, have opinions that may or may not be politically biased.  And again, how is this any different than President Obama and VP Biden's shakedown of the Ukraine? 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

5 hours ago, Tahoma said:

Thank goodness for true patriots like this whistleblower.  He's exposed yet more of Trump's bottomless corruption.  Impeachment is a slam dunk.

Yes really this time. Its slam dunk impeachment.. for the 400th time in 3 years.  

 

[90DayFinancier 910]

52 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

It seems to me there are a bunch of folks that like everyone else, have opinions that may or may not be politically biased.  And again, how is this any different than President Obama and VP Biden's shakedown of the Ukraine? 

The difference?

One...habeas corpus

Two...Biden and Obama are not in office.

Edited October 31, 2019 by 90DayFinancier
Spelling

[Dashinka 23,237]

43 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The difference?

One...habeas corpus

Two...Biden and Obama are not in office.

Habeas Corpus?  What does that have anything to do with the examples I cited?  Is someone being unlawfully detained?  I certainly understand that President Obama and VP Biden are no longer in office, so by using that as one of the differences then can I infer from you that if their item was found out while in office you would be screaming for impeachment?

Edited October 31, 2019 by Bill & Katya

[90DayFinancier 910]

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

Habeas Corpus?  What does that have anything to do with the examples I cited.  I certainly understand that President Obama and VP Biden are no longer in office, so by using that as one of the differences then can I infer from you that if their item was found out while in office you would be screaming for impeachment?

Habeas Corpus, what evidence that a crime as occurred?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, 90DayFinancier said:

The Whistle Blower has been made irrelevant to the process by the fact that several people with first hand knowledge have described the President's attempt to shake down a foreign country. 

 

If the house is on fire, you don't have a committee meeting to determine who pulled the alarm.

 

Republican talk points need to pivot to something relevant. The hearings are going to go forward. 

Just like Kavanaugh/Ford, huh?  HANG TRUMP!!

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Habeas Corpus, what evidence that a crime as occurred?

Great question!!  What evidence is there that Trump committed a crime?  After 2+ years of hounding by the dems...  nada.