Jump to content

151 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Also the Dailymail put out a story about her the other day with some edited pictures. I won't post the link here due to it being a family friendly site and her being naked doing her gf's hair is not family friendly. 

The link is on here.

 

I have a feeling most on here could google Daily Mail and Katie Hill.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted
33 minutes ago, Boris Farage said:

Because when he was "just" a billionaire, he could have strung any accusation out for years or longer. The public wouldn't care, and it would be buried in the court system. But because he is president, he is high profile, and they are betting that he will just throw money at them to settle, so he can get on with the business of running the country. I hope he doesn't do that, but this appears to be their strategy.

 

No, I asked about Democrats holding a perverted Democratic congresswoman to the same standards they hold Mr. Trump to. After all, morality shouldn't be dependent on the political position one holds, should it?

What the congresswomen has done (apparently) is engage in an extramarital affair. It is well documented that the President has engaged in several extramarital affairs.  I couldn't care a whit about either topic. Only the illegal playoff by the Presidents lawyer was of concern to me, personally. The congresswoman saw fit to resign.

 

 

What also needs to examined is the 25 allegations of sexual assault.  The Zevos case is moving forward and the "catch and kill" National enquirer stories may come to light and many powerful people may see their lives change. 

 

Yet he is President and still here, no the President is not held to any standard, his fans lap up every crumb like it is manna.

 

Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, Boris Farage said:

 

 

No, I asked about Democrats holding a perverted Democratic congresswoman to the same standards they hold Mr. Trump to. After all, morality shouldn't be dependent on the political position one holds, should it?

 

    I don’t care about Trump’s relationship’s either provided they are legal and everyone consents. On the other hand, if the congresswoman is suspected to be guilty of sexual harassment or quid quo pro, I would certainly want her investigated.

Edited by Steeleballz

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Scotland
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Boiler said:

The link is on here.

 

I have a feeling most on here could google Daily Mail and Katie Hill.

Yeah... those pictures are... kind of spicy.

 

As someone who had FAR less explicit pictures posted of her online, I can tell you that being exposed (literally) like that is devastating. How cowardly of her husband -- and it sure looks like it was him -- to have shared those photos. I don't care how messy your divorce is, this is NOT acceptable.

Posted
Just now, 90DayFinancier said:

What the congresswomen has done (apparently) is engage in an extramarital affair. It is well documented that the President has engaged in several extramarital affairs.  I couldn't care a whit about either topic. Only the illegal playoff by the Presidents lawyer was of concern to me, personally. The congresswoman saw fit to resign.

 

 

What also needs to examined is the 25 allegations of sexual assault.  The Zevos case is moving forward and the "catch and kill" National enquirer stories may come to light and many powerful people may see their lives change. 

 

Yet he is President and still here, no the President is not held to any standard, his fans lap up every crumb like it is manna.

 

Actually what got her was that she was sleeping with not 1 but two of her staffers, and that is what lead to a ethics investigation. 

 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

Seems one of the staffers got a bonus as well.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
14 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Actually what got her was that she was sleeping with not 1 but two of her staffers, and that is what lead to a ethics investigation. 

 

 

Ah understandable then.

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Yeah... those pictures are... kind of spicy.

 

As someone who had FAR less explicit pictures posted of her online, I can tell you that being exposed (literally) like that is devastating. How cowardly of her husband -- and it sure looks like it was him -- to have shared those photos. I don't care how messy your divorce is, this is NOT acceptable.

I really am so grateful for not being raised around electronics because I sure did a lot of stuff back in the day. There may or may not be a video of me from Myrtle Beach in 2002 floating around out there which I hope it never comes to light. Yeah he was supposedly posting pictures of her on websites saying "Do you think she is hot" or something along those lines. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
49 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

       The cop hauled a suspect before the Arkansas police judge.  "Yer Honor, this here suspect is charged with bigotry.  He's got three wives."

       "Three wives?!" thundered the judge.  "Why, you moron, that ain't bigotry -- that's trigonometry!"

Certificate.jpg

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: IR-5 Country: England
Timeline
Posted
8 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

What the congresswomen has done (apparently) is engage in an extramarital affair. It is well documented that the President has engaged in several extramarital affairs.  I couldn't care a whit about either topic. Only the illegal playoff by the Presidents lawyer was of concern to me, personally. The congresswoman saw fit to resign.

No. The President has not engaged in several extramarital affairs. Mr. Trump engaged in extramarital affairs before he became President. Those affairs should have been between him and his wife, but the liberals keep dragging it out into the public, as if that somehow had any bearing whatsoever on his ability to lead this country. Obviously his wife has gotten over it, why can't everyone else?

 

11 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

What also needs to examined is the 25 allegations of sexual assault.  The Zevos case is moving forward and the "catch and kill" National enquirer stories may come to light and many powerful people may see their lives change.

Yes, the Democrats will trawl through every single rumor and thin accusation, hoping that maybe one of them will stick. I suppose this is the "responsible governance" Nancy keeps speaking of.

 

13 minutes ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Yet he is President and still here, no the President is not held to any standard, his fans lap up every crumb like it is manna.

You make it sound so unseemly to support a president who has not been charged with a crime. The Democrats smear him on an hourly basis, but nothing sticks. You say it's because his supporters blindly support him? Please. His supporters would turn against him in a moment if any of the more serious charges, such as collusion with foreign governments, actually had any weight behind them. His supporters support him because unlike the rabid left, they look at the evidence with a critical eye, and then dismiss it as the fabrication it is. If any actual evidence were to come forth that had any basis in fact, that would be a different story. You say Mr. Trump's fans "lap up every crumb like it is manna." I say the liberals "lap up every crumb" of fabricated garbage being fed to them by the likes of Nancy and Chuck "like it is mana."

 

-

“He’s in there fighting,” the president said. “Boris knows how to win.”

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

Ah understandable then.

Yeah the female staffer lived with them in the house and was part of the Throuple. But then she had sex with the male staffer without the husband's knowledge and that's why he was pissed. They supposedly had a "open relationship" as long as each other knew what the other one was doing or asking if it was ok. Also she ran in that district as being openly bisexual, which that district is more Libertarian than anything. 

Edited by Cyberfx1024
Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Scotland
Timeline
Posted
Just now, Cyberfx1024 said:

I really am so grateful for not being raised around electronics because I sure did a lot of stuff back in the day. There may or may not be a video of me from Myrtle Beach in 2002 floating around out there which I hope it never comes to light. Yeah he was supposedly posting pictures of her on websites saying "Do you think she is hot" or something along those lines. 

Yeah, this was a selfie that was meant for ONE PERSON. It wasn't in the category of "n00dz" or anything, but it was provocative. It was posted by my ex on a forum in a thread that was literally of the same "do you think she's hot" type you're talking about. (The forum was about the third-rate football team he supports -- it was a "who's got the hottest wife/GF" thread.) It totally destroyed my trust in him when I found out from a third party, and I broke our engagement for a while. Since then, no, no photographic evidence. Just no. I felt objectified and the things he said about me -- even though they were in praise -- were just horrible to have to read. 

 

I think Hill should have resigned because she broke the rules. But she didn't deserve to have her private pics plastered all over the place.

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted
7 minutes ago, Boris Farage said:

No. The President has not engaged in several extramarital affairs. Mr. Trump engaged in extramarital affairs before he became President. Those affairs should have been between him and his wife, but the liberals keep dragging it out into the public, as if that somehow had any bearing whatsoever on his ability to lead this country. Obviously his wife has gotten over it, why can't everyone else?

 

Yes, the Democrats will trawl through every single rumor and thin accusation, hoping that maybe one of them will stick. I suppose this is the "responsible governance" Nancy keeps speaking of.

 

You make it sound so unseemly to support a president who has not been charged with a crime. The Democrats smear him on an hourly basis, but nothing sticks. You say it's because his supporters blindly support him? Please. His supporters would turn against him in a moment if any of the more serious charges, such as collusion with foreign governments, actually had any weight behind them. His supporters support him because unlike the rabid left, they look at the evidence with a critical eye, and then dismiss it as the fabrication it is. If any actual evidence were to come forth that had any basis in fact, that would be a different story. You say Mr. Trump's fans "lap up every crumb like it is manna." I say the liberals "lap up every crumb" of fabricated garbage being fed to them by the likes of Nancy and Chuck "like it is mana."

I appreciate you parsing the words for me. The President has not engaged in extramarital affairs, bragged about doing any he wants to women, stand accused of 25 sexual assaults, cheated on his taxes, declared bankruptcy 3x leaving untold working contractors hanging, paid hush money to silence one or more of his affairs,. hired illegal aliens, BECAUSE, that was Donald Trump and he did not actually do those things as President. 

Filed: IR-5 Country: England
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Yeah, this was a selfie that was meant for ONE PERSON. It wasn't in the category of "n00dz" or anything, but it was provocative. It was posted by my ex on a forum in a thread that was literally of the same "do you think she's hot" type you're talking about. (The forum was about the third-rate football team he supports -- it was a "who's got the hottest wife/GF" thread.) It totally destroyed my trust in him when I found out from a third party, and I broke our engagement for a while. Since then, no, no photographic evidence. Just no. I felt objectified and the things he said about me -- even though they were in praise -- were just horrible to have to read.

It very well could have been that your ex posted it because he was proud of you. You said it wasn't a straight up nude. It sounds like it was on of those guy things, like "boys, here's a lady you will never, ever have a shot at, because she's all mine."

 

-

“He’s in there fighting,” the president said. “Boris knows how to win.”

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
8 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Yeah, this was a selfie that was meant for ONE PERSON. It wasn't in the category of "n00dz" or anything, but it was provocative. It was posted by my ex on a forum in a thread that was literally of the same "do you think she's hot" type you're talking about. (The forum was about the third-rate football team he supports -- it was a "who's got the hottest wife/GF" thread.) It totally destroyed my trust in him when I found out from a third party, and I broke our engagement for a while. Since then, no, no photographic evidence. Just no. I felt objectified and the things he said about me -- even though they were in praise -- were just horrible to have to read. 

 

I think Hill should have resigned because she broke the rules. But she didn't deserve to have her private pics plastered all over the place.

Aston Villa?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...