Jump to content
Burnt Reynolds

Nationwide riot megathread

 Share

1,126 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
5 hours ago, laylalex said:

But you did say: 

 

"Happening" implies that there are riots currently ongoing, not ones that have already occurred (i.e. it is the present continuous tense). Of course there could be some in the future, none of us have a crystal ball. But I wanted to make clear to people who may not be paying attention that there's nothing of the sort happening here now, nor has there been for almost two and a half months. Minor point but an important one I think. Call it boosterism. :P 

Considering that Chauvin didn't kill Floyd, why have any riots at all?  What was the point, exactly?  Do you support any of them or their intended message?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
4 hours ago, laylalex said:

But you pointed out Los Angeles specifically, and they aren't happening. They happened. They might happen again. But happening? No.

 

I have some time before I have to do a wedding planning call with my mom and sister, we can bat this back and forth. :P 

hap·pen·ing
/ˈhap(ə)niNG/
 
noun
an event or occurrence.
"altogether it was an eerie happening"
 
a partly improvised or spontaneous piece of theatrical or other artistic performance, typically involving audience participation.
"a multimedia happening"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Israel
Timeline
9 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Only some black lives matter.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/seattle-police-chief-carmen-best-resignation-lack-of-respect

 

We'll see if Seattle voters are going to take back their city, or encourage this chaos and watch an exodus.

I actually refer to them as OOLM nowadays (only our lives matter). It's funny doing it publicly and telling people what it means after they ask about it

09/14/2012: Sent I-130
10/04/2012: NOA1 Received
12/11/2012: NOA2 Received
12/18/2012: NVC Received Case
01/08/2013: Received Case Number/IIN; DS-3032/I-864 Bill
01/08/2013: DS-3032 Sent
01/18/2013: DS-3032 Accepted; Received IV Bill
01/23/2013: Paid I-864 Bill; Paid IV Bill
02/05/2013: IV Package Sent
02/18/2013: AOS Package Sent
03/22/2013: Case complete
05/06/2013: Interview Scheduled

06/05/2013: Visa issued!

06/28/2013: VISA RECEIVED

07/09/2013: POE - EWR. Went super fast and easy. 5 minutes of waiting and then just a signature and finger print.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05/06/2016: One month late - overnighted form N-400.

06/01/2016: Original Biometrics appointment, had to reschedule due to being away.

07/01/2016: Biometrics Completed.

08/17/2016: Interview scheduled & approved.

09/16/2016: Scheduled oath ceremony.

09/16/2016: THE END - 4 year long process all done!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Considering that Chauvin didn't kill Floyd, why have any riots at all?  What was the point, exactly?  Do you support any of them or their intended message?

Just Mike Tyson'd the hornets nest. 

 

3 hours ago, OriZ said:

I'm usually the same way, but when it comes to rioting it's totally black and white( no pun). If you agree with it, you're a moron at least as far as that is concerned. There's a right and a wrong in that one. Rioting is never right.

Let's hope the geniuses doing this at the behest of much smarter people figure it out sooner rather than later that there's no benefit to this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:
hap·pen·ing
/ˈhap(ə)niNG/
 
noun
an event or occurrence.
"altogether it was an eerie happening"
 
a partly improvised or spontaneous piece of theatrical or other artistic performance, typically involving audience participation.
"a multimedia happening"

But it wasn't used as a noun there by Burnt. It was used as a participle, as part of the present continuous verb tense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
12 minutes ago, laylalex said:

But it wasn't used as a noun there by Burnt. It was used as a participle, as part of the present continuous verb tense. 

Kind of mincing words here.  Were there riots in CA and specifically the LA area?  Might there be more in the future?  Quite possibly.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

Kind of mincing words here.  Were there riots in CA and specifically the LA area?  Might there be more in the future?  Quite possibly.

There was looting in Santa Monica and in a couple parts of LA (specifically on Melrose and at the Grove). This happened at the end of May and the consensus from police is that it was organized crime that took advantage of the protests and the great number of people out on the streets to burglarize and vandalize businesses. There really hasn't been anything remarkable here since then, and there have been protests all over LA/SM/Culver City/BH/WeHo/etc., almost every day, if not every day. It's very, very chill here. I can't predict anything, so yeah, of course something could happen. Most of the protests I've seen in the past month are groups of seniors of every ethnicity standing on corners of major intersections, holding BLM signs, pro-teachers signs, etc. I always honk and wave hi, and they wave back. 

 

Nothing in the news ever about riots or things being crazy around here. I have the Citizen app, and most of my notifications are about someone threatening another person with a skateboard or a person walking into a 7-Eleven with their pants off, demanding to speak with God. There was an incident at the end of July near LA City Hall I heard about, police were in a showdown with protesters, with a few people getting physical with cops, pushing and shoving on all sides. There was some minor vandalism, a few arrests. But the cops said it was just a few people vandalizing, not the group as a whole. Since then, nothing. This place isn't a tinderbox, and the cops have done a good job for the most part in not escalating things unnecessarily.

 

Here's something that happened a few days ago that probably flew under the radar: https://ktla.com/news/local-news/hundreds-of-pro-trump-protesters-march-through-west-hollywood-to-beverly-hills/ Peaceful, just like pretty much everything else that's happening here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When talking to non-Californians, Santa Monica is generally my geographical point of reference for tolerable beach water, and that's because I spent most of my life in the SF Bay Area chilling on the beaches and enjoying tourists going to places like Half Moon Bay, Santa Cruz, Monterey (hell, even Pismo), hitting the beach, throwing off their shirt, sandals, etc., sprinting for the water, jumping in it, then screaming bloody murder and running out (as it was freezing cold). I'm sure nowadays they're a bit more prepared having research tools at their disposal so are more likely to either go south, go inland, or use a bodysuit. 

 

Anyways, the smaller sections/offshoots of these metro cities undoubtedly will contribute to their reputation, the way Richmond and Berkeley contribute to Oakland, East Palo Alto and South City contribute to SF, and so on. 

 

Regardless of the peaceful nature of many of these protests, what makes them memorable is the rioters, and there'd really be no sympathy if it were people on the other side of it torching buildings, seizing parts of cities, looting, attacking cops, attacking people, doxxing and harassing elected reps at their home, trespassing and threatening, and so on. And as long as these people cover for those doing this and make little to no effort to separate themselves, knowing their sympathies and defense of Antifa/BLM, they're logically going to be swept up in it too. I'm okay with that. Rationality needs to prevail and in a meaningful way, not a pointless virtue signal way, I don't like where the demographic I grew up and loved are taking things. So that's why you see me so viciously opposed. There's no being nice to that, these tactics turn nations into vast lands of suffering and misery, and we have wretched American foreign policy since WW2 to thank for showing us that.

Edited by Burnt Reynolds
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
2 hours ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

When talking to non-Californians, Santa Monica is generally my geographical point of reference for tolerable beach water, and that's because I spent most of my life in the SF Bay Area chilling on the beaches and enjoying tourists going to places like Half Moon Bay, Santa Cruz, Monterey (hell, even Pismo), hitting the beach, throwing off their shirt, sandals, etc., sprinting for the water, jumping in it, then screaming bloody murder and running out (as it was freezing cold). I'm sure nowadays they're a bit more prepared having research tools at their disposal so are more likely to either go south, go inland, or use a bodysuit. 

 

Anyways, the smaller sections/offshoots of these metro cities undoubtedly will contribute to their reputation, the way Richmond and Berkeley contribute to Oakland, East Palo Alto and South City contribute to SF, and so on. 

 

Regardless of the peaceful nature of many of these protests, what makes them memorable is the rioters, and there'd really be no sympathy if it were people on the other side of it torching buildings, seizing parts of cities, looting, attacking cops, attacking people, doxxing and harassing elected reps at their home, trespassing and threatening, and so on. And as long as these people cover for those doing this and make little to no effort to separate themselves, knowing their sympathies and defense of Antifa/BLM, they're logically going to be swept up in it too. I'm okay with that. Rationality needs to prevail and in a meaningful way, not a pointless virtue signal way, I don't like where the demographic I grew up and loved are taking things. So that's why you see me so viciously opposed. There's no being nice to that, these tactics turn nations into vast lands of suffering and misery, and we have wretched American foreign policy since WW2 to thank for showing us that.

You did/said nothing wrong nor inaccurate.

 

You should come visit us and see what nice beaches/water is really like!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
5 hours ago, laylalex said:

participle, as part of the present continuous verb tense. 

Provoking NB!  Reported!!!!!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
16 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Provoking NB!  Reported!!!!!

Now that is funny!

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Now that is funny!

And it was wanton provocation, at that!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...