I130 Case Denied after sending RFE | f2a & f2b, now appealing (merged)

[Rasel_Cool 22]

On 12/15/2019 at 4:04 AM, SusieQQQ said:

Never stopped anyone before 

case approved 

[Rasel_Cool 22]

On 12/9/2019 at 2:47 AM, jcracked52 said:

This thread is bogus. Sorry, OP,  I think you are trolling. 

 

First it's "one of my friends got denial letter" - and his DNA results were "99.96%" - What did his denial letter say? You never told us.

 

Then another friend is denied but hasn't gotten the denial letter and his DNA results were 99.9999999999996% but hasn't gotten the denial letter yet. 

 

If DNA test was legit and done through AABB laboratory, then there is no way I-130 was denied for your "friends"

 

Come on. 

 

doesnt matter. Appeal got approved. chill

[Villanelle 4,121]

Congratulations! 

[Rasel_Cool 22]

As everyone know 2 of our appeal got approved. but only my brothers appeal got dismissed on 9th  june. what can we do now? can we file motion to reconsider?

 

 

[Rasel_Cool 22]

12 hours ago, Rasel_Cool said:

As everyone know 2 of our appeal got approved. but only my brothers appeal got dismissed on 9th  june. what can we do now? can we file motion to reconsider?

 

 

 

On 5/25/2021 at 6:55 PM, Villanelle said:

Congratulations! 

pls check my last comment

[Rasel_Cool 22]

On 10/13/2019 at 6:38 PM, Going through said:

Just to clarify---since you said you sent all the other documents requested---was the RFE responded to on time?  That can also be a reason why a case is denied.

pls check my last comment

On 10/13/2019 at 8:48 PM, SusieQQQ said:

This is a good question. For all those piling on the OP for not doing dna, he did say it was voluntary not required, so maybe an error of judgement but the “you didn’t give them what they wanted” statements maybe a bit harsh in context. Remember most people (1) do not hang out on VJ all day (2) would think a lawyer knows what they’re talking about.

 

from OP’s earlier comments I am not entirely sure he understood “refile” means do everything over again for a brand new petition, but hopefully he realizes that now. And yes dna to help eliminate doubt this time is advisable.

check my last comment

[Rasel_Cool 22]

On 10/15/2019 at 1:04 PM, Paul & Mary said:

Yes

 

f2a may not be current once you get your petition approved. 

check my last comment

[Rasel_Cool 22]

On 3/4/2020 at 4:18 PM, osmosesnew said:

I used the I-290b to file a motion to reopen and gave them additional evidence including proof that DNA testing has been initiated. I pray it works.

did ur case get aporoved?

[Just Paul 4,591]

13 minutes ago, Rasel_Cool said:

check my last comment

Sounds like he didn't do DNA / Deal with the deficiency in a timely fashion. Sounds like the end of the line for him.  File a new petition.

Edited June 14, 2021 by Paul & Mary

[SusieQQQ 11,584]

44 minutes ago, Rasel_Cool said:

pls check my last comment

check my last comment

You don’t need to spam everyone individually to say the same thing but seeing as you quoted me - quite honestly, I am more surprised at the two approved than the one denied. The language of the denial was what i had expected for all of them. (Not sure if I missed it, but was there any difference between the cases on the timing of when the dna results came back, or anything else?)  As the letter says, the petition can be filed again. 

[Rasel_Cool 22]

1 minute ago, SusieQQQ said:

You don’t need to spam everyone individually to say the same thing but seeing as you quoted me - quite honestly, I am more surprised at the two approved than the one denied. The language of the denial was what i had expected for all of them. (Not sure if I missed it, but was there any difference between the cases on the timing of when the dna results came back, or anything else?)  As the letter says, the petition can be filed again. 

everything was same. including additional evidence+ brief.  everything was same. 

[Rasel_Cool 22]

2 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

You don’t need to spam everyone individually to say the same thing but seeing as you quoted me - quite honestly, I am more surprised at the two approved than the one denied. The language of the denial was what i had expected for all of them. (Not sure if I missed it, but was there any difference between the cases on the timing of when the dna results came back, or anything else?)  As the letter says, the petition can be filed again. 

I want to know if i can apply for motion to reopen now? I am that kind of guy who will not give up u know

[SusieQQQ 11,584]

2 minutes ago, Rasel_Cool said:

everything was same. including additional evidence+ brief.  everything was same. 

Then I think the two that were approved got very lucky.

[Rasel_Cool 22]

20 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

Then I think the two that were approved got very lucky.

true. But we were confident and we won 2.  That's a big thing. can we do a motion to reopen now?

[Rasel_Cool 22]

1 hour ago, Paul & Mary said:

Sounds like he didn't do DNA / Deal with the deficiency in a timely fashion. Sounds like the end of the line for him.  File a new petition.

we sent everything same time, same date,  everything.  can we to motion to repopen now? check this image.