WATCH: Rep AOC gets Michael Cohen to admit under oath that Trump committed insurance and tax fraud.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

[Póg mo 1,749]

6 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

You do realize that Cohen was convicted of lying under oath and actually lied under oath to Congress again yesterday multiple times.  Can you really believe anything he says, or since he is now part of the "Resistance" he must be believed to fit the TDS narratives?

Lying or not, you understand of course that Trump decided to associate himself with Michael Cohen. At best, this shows very poor judgement by Trump. 

 

[Póg mo 1,749]

Trump of course could quickly destroy Michael Cohen's testimony, by voluntering to release either his tax returns, or university transcripts, rather than wait for them to be subpoenaed.

[jg121783 3,907]

1 hour ago, Póg mo said:

Trump of course could quickly destroy Michael Cohen's testimony, by voluntering to release either his tax returns, or university transcripts, rather than wait for them to be subpoenaed.

Or he could ignore the convicted liar and allow the left to make themselves look even more foolish and gullible.

[Dashinka 23,247]

30 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Or he could ignore the convicted liar and allow the left to make themselves look even more foolish and gullible.

I’ll take door number 2.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Lying or not, you understand of course that Trump decided to associate himself with Michael Cohen. At best, this shows very poor judgement by Trump. 

 

So did Hillary.  What's your point?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

10 hours ago, ALFKAD said:

That exactly 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

13 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Trump of course could quickly destroy Michael Cohen's testimony, by voluntering to release either his tax returns, or university transcripts, rather than wait for them to be subpoenaed.

Just what ppk art of his testimony would that destroy. 

 

The only thinh of importance i heard was.

 

Cohen said there was no collusion,  which is what the whole mess is about.

 

Cohen testified that prostitute and her lawyer committed black mail. A felony 

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

17 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Trump of course could quickly destroy Michael Cohen's testimony, by voluntering to release either his tax returns, or university transcripts, rather than wait for them to be subpoenaed.

Looks like everything we've been saying about Trump's corruption has been pretty spot on. at this point releasing his tax returns would just get him into more trouble. 

[jg121783 3,907]

32 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

Looks like everything we've been saying about Trump's corruption has been pretty spot on. at this point releasing his tax returns would just get him into more trouble. 

If you choose to believe a convicted liar who was caught in multiple lies in the very testimony you are referencing.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

45 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

Looks like everything we've been saying about Trump's corruption has been pretty spot on. at this point releasing his tax returns would just get him into more trouble. 

I am sure in yours and Jim’s mind, this is true.  And I am not saying you are wrong... just saying I’d like to see some actual proof.

 

Good to see you back!

Edited March 1, 2019 by ALFKAD

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

41 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

Looks like everything we've been saying about Trump's corruption has been pretty spot on. at this point releasing his tax returns would just get him into more trouble. 

If the IRS is ok with his tax return I am ok with it.

[Dashinka 23,247]

46 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

Looks like everything we've been saying about Trump's corruption has been pretty spot on. at this point releasing his tax returns would just get him into more trouble. 

And your proof is the testimony of a convicted liar that may in fact incur another conviction of lying to Congress.  As soon as he said he didn't want a job in the WH in 2016/2017 even CNN admitted that was a big whopper, but believe what you will.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

13 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

I am sure in yours and Jim’s mind, this is true.  And I am not saying you are wrong... just saying I’d like to see some actual proof.

 

Good to see you back!

agreed Keith, good to see you back!