Brett Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Hearing Involving Accuser’s Parents

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

16 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

That's just incorrect. Like I said before, the state of MD has no statute of limitations on these kinds of things. If she files a report and should they find anything credible, charges could be filed. It happens in this state all the time.

Both people she claimed were  there have said it's not true.  The only record I know of is some vague reference to psychiatrist. 

 

of course  he state of Md is going to prosecute someone 40 years later, for groping someone at a party 40 years ago when they were 17.  when there is not one witness.

 

this is nothing more than a stall by the democrats to try to drag this into the midterms. Nothing more. What a slap in the face to women, that have actually been sexually assaulted. 

[jg121783 3,908]

1 hour ago, Marty Byrde said:

 

this is nothing more than a stall by the democrats to try to drag this into the midterms. Nothing more. What a slap in the face to women, that have actually been sexually assaulted. 

Exactly.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

5 hours ago, Boiler said:

So has she filed a report, if not why not?

That costs money, and is not really required, since her claim has already done the only thing it was intended to do.

[Dashinka 23,402]

19 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Blam! #2:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-democrat-accusations-not-enough-evidence/

 

Andrew McCarthy is really good!

[TBoneTX 43,493]

And blam!

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-nomination-stop-stalling-and-vote/

Holy mackerel!

[Boiler 43,803]

Wo;; be interesting to see the proof beyond reasonable doubt.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

4 down, how many more to go?

 

 

4th purported witness claims no knowledge of alleged Kavanaugh assault against Ford

In response, Ford’s lawyer Debra Katz said: “As Dr. Ford has said, she did not share her story publicly or with anyone for years following the incident with Judge Kavanaugh.

"It's not surprising that Ms. Keyser has no recollection of the evening as they did not discuss it. It's also unremarkable that Ms. Keyser does not remember attending a specific gathering 30 years ago at which nothing of consequence happened to her. Dr. Ford of course will never forget this gathering because of what happened to her there.”

 

Keyser’s denial brings to four the number of witnesses, including Kavanaugh, who’ve all said they have no memory of the party or the incident.

 

 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/4th-purported-witness-claims-no-knowledge-alleged-kavanaugh-assault-against-ford.html

Edited September 23, 2018 by Satisfied

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

And for those here who support Ford, who think the incident may actually be real (I am really having serious doubts myself), ask yourself....   If this isn’t a political stunt, then why did Ford take her complaint to an opposing politician, as opposed to law enforcement?

[Merle 458]

3 hours ago, Boiler said:

Wo;; be interesting to see the proof beyond reasonable doubt.

That would require a time traveling Delorean, 1.21 jigawatts, and a Huey Lewis and the News soundtrack. 

Edited September 23, 2018 by Merle

[yuna628 9,547]

23 hours ago, Boiler said:

So has she filed a report, if not why not?

You'd have to ask her that question. But I suspect it's a possibility in the future. Her legal team would be guiding decisions now.

22 hours ago, Marty Byrde said:

Both people she claimed were  there have said it's not true.  The only record I know of is some vague reference to psychiatrist. 

 

of course  he state of Md is going to prosecute someone 40 years later, for groping someone at a party 40 years ago when they were 17.  when there is not one witness.

 

this is nothing more than a stall by the democrats to try to drag this into the midterms. Nothing more. What a slap in the face to women, that have actually been sexually assaulted. 

Again, you were not there. So you cannot know if she has been sexually assaulted or not, any more than I or anyone else here does. MD and other states have proven successful in prosecuting such cases. Witnesses are not always required. Whether her claims are true or not, in either case she could make things very embarrassingly problematic if R's continue to support him instead of someone else. She could launch a variety of legal measures, investigations, depositions... all sorts of things. She does not have to be telling the truth about any of it to do so.

2 hours ago, Satisfied said:

And for those here who support Ford, who think the incident may actually be real (I am really having serious doubts myself), ask yourself....   If this isn’t a political stunt, then why did Ford take her complaint to an opposing politician, as opposed to law enforcement?

We are not in her shoes, and much of her actions she's taken has been based in rampant speculation. We don't know why, we can only surmise. It could be nefarious or it could be for other reasons.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

25 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

You'd have to ask her that question. But I suspect it's a possibility in the future. Her legal team would be guiding decisions now.

Again, you were not there. So you cannot know if she has been sexually assaulted or not, any more than I or anyone else here does. MD and other states have proven successful in prosecuting such cases. Witnesses are not always required. Whether her claims are true or not, in either case she could make things very embarrassingly problematic if R's continue to support him instead of someone else. She could launch a variety of legal measures, investigations, depositions... all sorts of things. She does not have to be telling the truth about any of it to do so.

We are not in her shoes, and much of her actions she's taken has been based in rampant speculation. We don't know why, we can only surmise. It could be nefarious or it could be for other reasons.

4 people she quoted as being involved have said its not true.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Third Named Witness Rejects Kavanaugh’s Accuser’s Allegations

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/third-named-witness-rejects-kavanaughs-accusers-allegations/

Blasey Ford's Female Classmate, Her Last Named Witness, Doesn't Recall Ever Attending Party With Kavanaugh

https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/blasey-fords-female-classmate-her-last-alleged-witness-denies-ever-attending-party-with-kavanaugh

Edited September 23, 2018 by Marty Byrde

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

Don't confuse facts with agenda

[yuna628 9,547]

18 minutes ago, Marty Byrde said:

4 people she quoted as being involved have said its not true.

There are only two other people besides herself, that she claims were in the room with her at the time - Kavanaugh and Judge. Judge himself has severe credibility problems, is unwilling to testify (why?) and neither one of the men have submitted to a polygraph. Ford contends she has passed a polygraph. Will this be admitted as evidence in the hearing? Other persons being 'witnesses' really cannot be witnesses if they were not at the room. It's fair enough if they do not recall a party 30-40 years ago. Do you remember all parties and locations you attended in your youth? Just curious. Keyser, whom you quote as 'rejecting' the allegations, merely says she doesn't recall being at the party, and if you read her full statement, just because she does not recall being at the party in question doesn't mean she doesn't believe Ford. To the contrary, she does believe her allegations are truthful, she stated as much on the record to the press today.

Edited September 23, 2018 by yuna628

[jg121783 3,908]

On 9/18/2018 at 6:39 PM, yuna628 said:

Judge has his own credibility problems... but currently he has made numerous statements about his past being a blackout drunkard.. including mentions of Kavanaugh in his 'memoirs'. He's lawyered up, tried to clean up his 'social media' (which was disgusting), and doesn't want to testify. They may have to subpoena him. Rumor has it the WH is concerned about more stuff that may be coming out, and they may be prepared to drop him in a few days. Like I said, it would be in their best interests to cut him loose and get someone Dems would have a hard time arguing about.

Dems would argue about anyone to spite Trump. Kavanaugh is about as middle of the road as they come and the dems have to make up reasons not to confirm him. Like I said it is all about opposing anything Trump does.