Brett Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Hearing Involving Accuser’s Parents

[Cyberfx1024 7,978]

2 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Doubt it. She has plenty to loose, for five minutes of fame. Not to mention her career and social standing. If she wanted to make money, she could have just sold her story to a tabloid, if she was just in it for the money. 

 

Not really because she lives/works in Commie California. So she can probably get a higher paid position in the CA administration, but in all honesty there is not really a higher paid position than a professor. 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

59 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

So the lady is now the same as a stripper? Who slept with the president? 

If you’re referring to Stormy Daniels, she was way more than a stripper. She was a prostitute.

[Boiler 43,458]

2 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

If you’re referring to Stormy Daniels, she was way more than a stripper. She was a prostitute.

And Author

 

Apparently.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

 

Looks like this is being exposed for what it is. An attempt to drag this out past the mid terms. Nothing for them to investigate. Shameful diversion of democracy by the dems 

 

 

Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before testifying

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Feinstein blames GOP after Kavanaugh accuser stays mum, admits 'I can't say everything's truthful'

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/feinstein-blames-gop-after-kavanaugh-accuser-stays-mum-admits-cant-say-everythings-truthful.html

[Póg mo 1,749]

13 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Not really because she lives/works in Commie California. So she can probably get a higher paid position in the CA administration, but in all honesty there is not really a higher paid position than a professor. 

Of course there are, but money isn't everything.

[Póg mo 1,749]

58 minutes ago, Marty Byrde said:

 

Looks like this is being exposed for what it is. An attempt to drag this out past the mid terms. Nothing for them to investigate. Shameful diversion of democracy by the dems 

 

 

Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before testifying

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html

Typically right wing, if someone doesn't say what they want to hear, they get death threats.

 

 

The letter from Ford's lawyers notes that despite receiving a "stunning amount of support from her community," Ford has also "been the target of vicious harassment and even death threats" and has been forced to leave her home.

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,978]

1 hour ago, Marty Byrde said:

 

Looks like this is being exposed for what it is. An attempt to drag this out past the mid terms. Nothing for them to investigate. Shameful diversion of democracy by the dems 

 

 

Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before testifying

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html

I heard earlier that the FBI already looked at this and did not want to proceed with any type of full investigation. So what exactly is going to change to warrant a full investigation?

[Póg mo 1,749]

1 hour ago, Marty Byrde said:

 

Looks like this is being exposed for what it is. An attempt to drag this out past the mid terms. Nothing for them to investigate. Shameful diversion of democracy by the dems 

 

 

Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before testifying

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html

Did you complain when Merrick Garland couldn't even get a hearing? I bet you didn't.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

2 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

Did you complain when Merrick Garland couldn't even get a hearing? I bet you didn't.

you would lose that bet 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

21 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

Typically right wing, if someone doesn't say what they want to hear, they get death threats.

 

 

 

 

Better to get a death threat than SBH, hands down...

[yuna628 9,530]

15 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I heard earlier that the FBI already looked at this and did not want to proceed with any type of full investigation. So what exactly is going to change to warrant a full investigation?

Not exactly. They had looked into his background before for checks for 'clearances' apparently? But since he had not be accused openly of anything at the time, there would have been nothing further to investigate in that regard. Take Anita Hill's allegations against Justice Thomas during his hearings, he too had also been background checked by the FBI, but they are apparently not able to proceed further on new accusations, unless a request by the WH is made. Which is what the then-administration did for the Hill allegations. The FBI started digging, and pretty quickly, IIRC, which did not contribute to any significant delay. They do investigate old cases like this all the time. It should be investigated imo, if people truly want a thorough process. What they would have to do is speak to potential witnesses, classmates, and anyone familiar with both individuals. While it would not prove the truthfulness of the accusations, it could provide a pattern of additional evidence. It could be done quite quickly I think. One should note that having either party testify is not going to prove the truthfulness in either direction, just as it did not back in Hill vs Thomas. It's not a court of law. Perhaps the FBI would find something, and perhaps they would not. But at least we'd know.

 

I'm still hoping they cut him and go with someone better.

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 hour ago, yuna628 said:

Not exactly. They had looked into his background before for checks for 'clearances' apparently? But since he had not be accused openly of anything at the time, there would have been nothing further to investigate in that regard. Take Anita Hill's allegations against Justice Thomas during his hearings, he too had also been background checked by the FBI, but they are apparently not able to proceed further on new accusations, unless a request by the WH is made. Which is what the then-administration did for the Hill allegations. The FBI started digging, and pretty quickly, IIRC, which did not contribute to any significant delay. They do investigate old cases like this all the time. It should be investigated imo, if people truly want a thorough process. What they would have to do is speak to potential witnesses, classmates, and anyone familiar with both individuals. While it would not prove the truthfulness of the accusations, it could provide a pattern of additional evidence. It could be done quite quickly I think. One should note that having either party testify is not going to prove the truthfulness in either direction, just as it did not back in Hill vs Thomas. It's not a court of law. Perhaps the FBI would find something, and perhaps they would not. But at least we'd know.

 

I'm still hoping they cut him and go with someone better.

 

Better=MDL

[Merle 458]

1 hour ago, Póg mo said:

Typically right wing, if someone doesn't say what they want to hear, they get death threats.

 

 

 

 

Get real. The left is definitely known for this as well. Wackos reside on the extremes of both sides.

[yuna628 9,530]

30 minutes ago, Marty Byrde said:

Better=MDL

Nope. As I stated already, there are many more-qualified or just as qualified individuals waiting in line to take his place, with the same philosophy, if not a lot less wish-washy, and more principled and disciplined. Conservatives would have plenty to like in choosing any of them (Kavanaugh was not wanted by Mitch at all), and if they want to play it smart, they'd go with one of several qualified women who hold staunch viewpoints, but Democrats would have a hard time attacking.