Trump calling Omarosa a 'dog' is sexist and racist, period

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Just when you thought the loony left could not surpass their previous ineptitude . 

Is calling her a dog in poor taste ? Yes I agree.  Racist.. LOL

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/14/opinions/trump-calling-omarosa-dog-is-sexist-hossain/index.html

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

I cannot speak for Trump, but I am postulating that he had a different word in mind for her, but used dog instead.  

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

12 hours ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Just when you thought the loony left could not surpass their previous ineptitude . 

Is calling her a dog in poor taste ? Yes I agree.  Racist.. LOL

 

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/14/opinions/trump-calling-omarosa-dog-is-sexist-hossain/index.html

At this point, does anyone really disagree with Trump on this one? 

She's a slimeball opportunist.

[cyclone27 710]

Why disparage dogs?  Not fair to the dog being compared to Omarosa. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

42 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

At this point, does anyone really disagree with Trump on this one? 

She's a slimeball opportunist.

Poor judgment he gave her a job in the wh

[cyclone27 710]

Her entire MO is backstabbing. It perplexes me why he thought he could ever trust her.

[Dashinka 23,291]

40 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Poor judgment he gave her a job in the wh

Definitely, and even more poor judgement that he is giving her any attention at all at this point.  Let Gen. Kelly and the lawyers handle it, there is no need to give her any publicity.

 

On another note, I heard one of her interviews (I believe Today) and she said she felt intimidated in the WH, does anyone actually buy that she intimidates easily?

[smilesammich 10,727]

to sum up this thread, trump consistently uses poor judgement and it's funny when men in positions of power refer to their former female employees as dogs (lol lol wink wink we all know what he really meant).

on point as always fellas!

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

6 hours ago, smilesammich said:

to sum up this thread, trump consistently uses poor judgement and it's funny when men in positions of power refer to their former female employees as dogs (lol lol wink wink we all know what he really meant).

on point as always fellas!

You have a much different reading comprehension than I do, does he act like a petulant child? Yes, was it a poor way to express himself? Yes, she recorded a conversation in one of the most sensitive areas possible, I am quite sure this is illegal on several levels, imprudent on several levels, and s betrayal of the trust that was shown here by her, but sure bunch up your panties over the slight made to her

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

^^^ Nailed it!!

[smilesammich 10,727]

6 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

You have a much different reading comprehension than I do, does he act like a petulant child? Yes, was it a poor way to express himself? Yes, she recorded a conversation in one of the most sensitive areas possible, I am quite sure this is illegal on several levels, imprudent on several levels, and s betrayal of the trust that was shown here by her, but sure bunch up your panties over the slight made to her

what gives you the impression my panties are in a bunch? 

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

Just a thought

[smilesammich 10,727]

9 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

Just a thought

i had a thought too, like from the op..

"Those who study the history and science of human behavior have identified repeatedly the link between animal language and the tearing away of people's basic human rights. From pro-slavery propaganda comparing African Americans to monkeys to Nazi films portraying Jews as rats to Hutus calling Tutsis "cockroaches" during the Rwandan genocide, there is a documented connection between the use of animal terms and imagery and the dehumanizing of a racialized other."

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

It's not just limited to comparisons to animals.  But that is a common one because humans are supposed to be smarter than animals.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i had a thought too, like from the op..

"Those who study the history and science of human behavior have identified repeatedly the link between animal language and the tearing away of people's basic human rights. From pro-slavery propaganda comparing African Americans to monkeys to Nazi films portraying Jews as rats to Hutus calling Tutsis "cockroaches" during the Rwandan genocide, there is a documented connection between the use of animal terms and imagery and the dehumanizing of a racialized other."

You had a thought?

 

Looks like you repeated the opinion of a woman that was in a CNN opinion piece, if such articles are to be considered factual, I can find drivel that states differently, opinions are just that, look hard enough you can find an opinion article that pretty much says anything