NOIR

[antwiwaa 3]

Hello friends, pls share to your ideas with us as we gather evidence to rebut this noir. Here are the claims

1.relationship between the two parties is based on circumventing the immigration laws

FACTS

1. The petitioner and beneficiary married on 06/03/14 in ghana, the petitioner divorced his spouse on 01/14/11 in ghana despite the fact that the petitioner n his ex wife were lawful permanent residents of the US that time

2. The beneficiary was unable to provide dates and times of their initial Meetings

3. The beneficiary was unable to give detailed info abt petitioners job

4. Beneficiary cud not provide any info on how she contacts the petitioner 

5. Beneficiary cud not provide any substantive details abt petitionerso life in the US despite the claim she talks with him everyday. 

What evidence do you suggest we add to these claims from CO. Thnx 

[Roel 7,191]

3 minutes ago, antwiwaa said:

Hello friends, pls share to your ideas with us as we gather evidence to rebut this noir. Here are the claims

1.relationship between the two parties is based on circumventing the immigration laws

FACTS

1. The petitioner and beneficiary married on 06/03/14 in ghana, the petitioner divorced his spouse on 01/14/11 in ghana despite the fact that the petitioner n his ex wife were lawful permanent residents of the US that time

Um. What? Married in 2014 but divorced in 2011? What does being green card holder have to do with it? 

 

 

3 minutes ago, antwiwaa said:

2. The beneficiary was unable to provide dates and times of their initial Meetings

They should know this. It's an easy questions. 

 

3 minutes ago, antwiwaa said:

3. The beneficiary was unable to give detailed info abt petitioners job

Again. Easy question. 

3 minutes ago, antwiwaa said:

4. Beneficiary cud not provide any info on how she contacts the petitioner 

5. Beneficiary cud not provide any substantive details abt petitionerso life in the US despite the claim she talks with him everyday. 

What evidence do you suggest we add to these claims from CO. Thnx 

Honestly? This looks like 100% fake relationship. 

 

Those are basic questions and every normal loving couple would know those answers. 

 

What evidence do YOU add? So it's not some random beneficiary and petitioner. It's you and your spouse. Don't confuse people here. 

 

My advice? Get to know someone you actually married.

[Crazy Cat 39,318]

My honest opinion is that the only way to overcome these facts is if the US citizen moves to spouse's home country and lives there as a married couple for a few years. 

[Unlockable 7,306]

The not knowing details about initial meeting, petioners job and life in US, nor how they coomunicatr are huge red flags.

 

i agree that this does not sound like a solid relationship. 

[JFH 12,189]

54 minutes ago, antwiwaa said:

 

2. The beneficiary was unable to provide dates and times of their initial Meetings

3. The beneficiary was unable to give detailed info abt petitioners job

4. Beneficiary cud not provide any info on how she contacts the petitioner 

5. Beneficiary cud not provide any substantive details abt petitionerso life in the US despite the claim she talks with him everyday. 

What evidence do you suggest we add to these claims from CO. Thnx 

Goodness. If it's true that those basic questions could not be answered then the rejection was correct. I know more about my neighbor than these two know about their spouses. 

[ms_bobdog 501]

I could answer those questions even before I married my now-husband... 

[Sunnyland 639]

OP,  is this your personal case? Are you the beneficiary? 

Those are very easy questions and that you did not know the answers to all of them is a major huge red flag. This seems to be a fake relationship, sorry to sound rude. I know more about my in-laws that you do about your spouse.

Edited April 28, 2018 by Sunnyland

[Mr.Jose 64]

2 hours ago, antwiwaa said:

Hello friends, pls share to your ideas with us as we gather evidence to rebut this noir. Here are the claims

1.relationship between the two parties is based on circumventing the immigration laws

FACTS

1. The petitioner and beneficiary married on 06/03/14 in ghana, the petitioner divorced his spouse on 01/14/11 in ghana despite the fact that the petitioner n his ex wife were lawful permanent residents of the US that time

2. The beneficiary was unable to provide dates and times of their initial Meetings

3. The beneficiary was unable to give detailed info abt petitioners job

4. Beneficiary cud not provide any info on how she contacts the petitioner 

5. Beneficiary cud not provide any substantive details abt petitionerso life in the US despite the claim she talks with him everyday. 

What evidence do you suggest we add to these claims from CO. Thnx 

If the beneficiary is unable to answer those question then clearly something doesn’t add up. Was the interview in a language the beneficiary understood?

[antwiwaa 3]

1 hour ago, Mr.Bob said:

If the beneficiary is unable to answer those question then clearly something doesn’t add up. Was the interview in a language the beneficiary understood?

Im the the beneficiary, trust,,,I was very shock and a angry to see these as the reason for our denial.... I answered everyone one of those questions...had my interview 2 years after Marriage n plus 2 year of knowing n constantly being in touch. We communicate almost everyday n I sent our call logs to the interview. I just have to accept n find a solution to the problem at hand that's y I'm here soliciting for ideas...tnx 

[Roel 7,191]

You said you answered questions but embassy says you were unable to. So where's the truth? 

 

[antwiwaa 3]

4 hours ago, Roel said:

Um. What? Married in 2014 but divorced in 2011? What does being green card holder have to do with it? 

 

 

They should know this. It's an easy questions. 

 

Again. Easy question. 

Honestly? This looks like 100% fake relationship. 

 

Those are basic questions and every normal loving couple would know those answers. 

 

What evidence do YOU add? So it's not some random beneficiary and petitioner. It's you and your spouse. Don't confuse people here. 

 

My advice? Get to know someone you actually married.

Yes it looks like it because for watever reason that's wat they wrote to us..

I swear on my own life that I answered all these questions more...even if it was a sham or some sort of staged marriage,don't u think I will l can memorize these basic answers?

Common even a basic school student can do that. I'm only askn for wat to do...not for ur judgment pls,,,I wish u understand wat this waiting makes me feel.. we have no child yet n we're thinking of him relocating back home so we can try.. U can pls offer an idea or to stop judging pls.

[antwiwaa 3]

3 minutes ago, Roel said:

You said you answered questions but embassy says you were unable to. So where's the truth? 

 

Yes I answered everyone of those questions with evidence...for calls we mostly talk on wataspp,,,I sent wataspp call logs...

Why won't  know where my husband of 2yrs now 4yrs work n do?

I jus want to remain calm so we can go tru this successfully. ...Only God n the CO knows y he had to lie.

If I cud prepare for an interview, I think even if it was a staged marriage, I will at least ask him to couch me on these basic things. 

All I'm asking for is, how do we go abt this. 

[antwiwaa 3]

5 hours ago, Roel said:

Um. What? Married in 2014 but divorced in 2011? What does being green card holder have to do with it? 

 

 

They should know this. It's an easy questions. 

 

Again. Easy question. 

Honestly? This looks like 100% fake relationship. 

 

Those are basic questions and every normal loving couple would know those answers. 

 

What evidence do YOU add? So it's not some random beneficiary and petitioner. It's you and your spouse. Don't confuse people here. 

 

My advice? Get to know someone you actually married.

Thank you,,,but I think I do know this. For sake do u think I can't answer a question of what my husband do, ,as in his job?

His hobbies. ..plsss. 

Anyway...thnx for ur response. 

[antwiwaa 3]

5 hours ago, missileman said:

My honest opinion is that the only way to overcome these facts is if the US citizen moves to spouse's home country and lives there as a married couple for a few years. 

Yeaa...we planning on that. ..tnx. 

We jus want to give this our last trial...we're all from one country n he comes every year.

[antwiwaa 3]

To everyone who wants to help find a solution to this,,,first know that the CO lied,,,the only one I truth on that noir is their first assertion, ( which I don't understand yet tho) hubby divorced in 2011 n we married in 2014. I still don't know y it's a problem tho,,,we meet tru my cousin, he went to stay with him wen he( hubby's) separated from his wife(2010)...note we were not dating at that,,, I was only being asked to be chatting with him to help him overcome his pain. 

If anyone here have any idea how to overcome this so that I can stop my husband to move back home to start all over again, pls do share with me. Thank u