Jump to content
Jarun

Denied K-1 - finally got response - says cash and sexual favors demanded in exchange for immigrant petition

 Share

55 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

OMG I am in total shock - our K-1 Visa was denied in February 2013 by Mumbai Consulate; today received letter from USCIS saying they are administratively closing the petition because validity dates have expired (we expected this) and the action is without prejudice to filing any future petitions or applications. OK fine - but attached is a memo to NVC from Chief, Immigrant Visa Unit Mumbai, which states;.. unusually large age difference , older female younger male, non-Indian etc. . . their fraud investigation revealed that Petitioner made cash payments to Beneficiary and demanded sexual favors in exchange for filing etc. It goes on to say then we provided highly graphic chats as evidence of relationship and made frequent mention of cash payments from Beneficiary to the Petitioner, as well as Petitioner threatening to "rescind" (her) petition" if Beneficiary does not "straighten up'.

None of this is true! The memo indicates both of us paid the other one for sexual favors to get the visa - what?!?!?!?!? I do not see how a government agency can state these things without proof. We obviously did not pay one another, nor did we provide "highly graphic chats" - we had phone logs and some skypes and emails, but nothing of that nature.

We don't know if we can get any other information or should bother, but it is sickening to think this is in the file now tucked away at USCIS, even thought we can file again. Just really upset to see something like this about us in writing from the government!

Just wanted to share that things can get really messed up - they obviously have us mixed up with someone else - just in disbelief!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline

Sorry to hear this! They can't deny based on age, that's discrimination! I would consult with a lawyer.

01/2006 - Filed k1(1st time)

04/2006 - Interview (1st time) denied

Waited, waited...... no review

06/2009 - Filed k1 (2nd time)

09/2009 - NOA 2 approved

12/2009 - Interview (2nd time) APPROVED! VISA ISSUED

02/2010 - Arrived USA

04/2010 - Married

AOS Timeline

4/19/2010-Sent to Chicago Lockbox

4/26/2010-Received texts and emails 7th day

4/30/2010-Received NOA's(Hardcopies) 11th day

5/3/2010-Received ASC appointment notice(mailed 4/29/2010)14th day

5/7/2010-Walk-in Biometrics done(2 weeks earlier)18th day

5/13/2010-Case transferred to CSC

6/2/2010- Case received/resumed at CSC

6/18,6/22,6/23 AOS touches

6/28/2010- EAD production and touch on AP

6/29/2010-AOS APPROVED

7/2/2010- 2nd update on EAD production and touched on AP....

7/6/2010- Received "Welcome Letter" and AP document

7/12/2010-Received GREEN CARD and EAD

greencard.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Nigeria
Timeline

They didn't deny based on age they denied based on red flags of being against cultural norms and not over coming the presumption of relation for immigration purposes

This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Can you post the memo or type it exactly? Depending on what it actually says I have a few ideas...

Are you sure of what information your fiance provided at the interview? Maybe he provided some chats he shouldn't have? Maybe someone actually sent them in to show your relationship was/is fake?

If this memo is not actually related to you (maybe it was inserted in error? mistakes do happen) then I would get a senator or congressperson involved in having said memo removed from your file because you believe it was inserted in error. If it WASN'T submitted in error and they truly believe it... you may want to submit a FOIA request to see what chats they're talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

I don't have a way to post the memo right now, but it has our names, then the beneficiary appeared for interview. Information elicited during this and subsequent post fraud prevention unit revealed Petitioner made cash payments and demanded sexual favors in exchange for filing an immigration petition for the beneficiary. As a result, post requests the petition be revoked.

The beneficiary applied for immigrant visa as fiancé of US citizen. There was an unusually large age difference between the older, female petitioner and the younger male beneficiary, petitioner was not of Indian origin and married before. These facts led Post's Fraud Prevention to prescreen the application for immigration fraud.

During the course of the FPU investigation the Petitioner and the Beneficiary made available many pages of highly graphic chat transcripts as proof of ongoing relationship. These transcripts, however, made frequent mention of cash payments from Beneficiary to the Petitioner, as well as the Petitioner threatening to "rescind (her) petition" if Beneficiary does not "straighten up".

As cash and sexual favors appear to have been promised in exchange for an immigration petition, the Beneficiary is not entitled to K1 visa classification. The preponderance of new evidence, not previously available to USCIS, demonstrates that the petitioner and beneficiary provide misleading material in order to gain an immigration benefit. Therefore, Post is returning the petition to USCIS via the National Visa Center, with a recommendation of revocation under INA 212 (a)(5)(a).

that's it - we did not exchange money with one another nor did we provide chats stating such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Is the quote about rescinding the petition correct?

Is there mention of ANY money in the chats? There must be or it wouldn't be mentioned. For example gifts? Discussing monetary concerns for once you're together again?

The "highly graphic" chat's seems to imply that you're talking about your sex life at some point. Are you SURE your fiance didn't submit these chats at interview thinking that it made your relationship look better but he didn't want to tell you 'cause you'd be embarrassed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

No, there was never any mention of rescinding the petition; the chats we sent were about being together, that we love each other, what we did over the weekend, things like that, just a few from the past year prior to filing the petition. Most of the documents were LocalPhone logs. Nothing graphic - no money. At the interview, the CO did say to him that one of us must be paying the other one for this, it was a highly-charged interview, lasting several hours, they accused us of making this all up, that no one could love one another as we profess, etc. We went thru the documents we sent together. We never thought it would come to a memo saying we paid one another for the petition and sexual favors. Gosh, never, ever dreamt that! We already asked for the information via FOIA and were denied; they told us what we were requesting was not under that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

*** Thread moved from K-1 Process forum to the K-1 Case Progress subforum. ***

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

wow.gif

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no words to say. I really am feel sorry for you and your fiancé(e). I hope some people here can shed a light for your case. Be strong!

Know your enemy and know yourself and you can fight a hundred battles without disaster.Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat

- Sun Tzu-

It doesn't matter how slow you go as long as you don't stop

-Confucius-

 

-I am the beneficiary and my post is not reflecting my petitioner's point of views-

 

                                       Lifting Condition (I-751)

 

*Mailed I-751 package (06/21/2017) to CSC

*NOA-1 date (06/23/2017)

*NOA-1 received (06/28/2017)

*Check cashed (06/27/2017)

*Biometric Received (07/10/2017)

*Biometric Appointment (07/20/2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: India
Timeline

I'm so sorry this is happening. I hope that you will be able to find out exactly why they have made these claims and get it corrected.

K1 Visa

Service Center : Vermont Service Center (transferred to Texas Service Center)

Consulate : Mumbai, India

I-129F Sent : 2013-01-24

I-129F NOA1 : 2013-01-29

I-129F RFE(s) : none

RFE Reply(s) : na

I-129F transferred to TSC: 2013-06-28

I-129F NOA2 : 2013-07-09

NVC Received : 2013-07-24

NVC Left : 2013-08-05

Consulate Received : 2013-08-19

Packet 3 Received : none

Packet 3 Sent : none

Packet 4 Received : none

Interview Date : 2013-09-23 APPROVED!!! dancin5hr.gif

Visa Received: 2013-10-01

AOS

Filed - 03/08/2014
NOA1 Email -
03/10/2014

Biometrics Appointment - 04/04/2014

Potential Interview Waiver Letter - 06/27/2014

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...