mupsyc

Fairly certain that you can't remove a sponsor.
But for your Aunt's peace of mind, tell her this -
Technically, your Aunt doesn't actually have to do anything to be a co-sponsor. She is not obligued to give you financial support etc. Basically, the only thing the Affidavit of Support is good for is ensuring that the Immigrant does not take advantage of any welfare programs here in the US. The government wants someone to track down so they can recover their $$$$
So long as you don't become a charge of the state (get food stamps, medicaid, welfare etc etc) then your Aunt literally has to do nothing, and has nothing to worry about.
Plus, 3 years after you receive your greencard, you can apply for citizenship, and then the Affidavit become null and void.

Make a trip to the local Social Security Office.  If you applied for it with the DS-260 then it can take 4 to 6 weeks.   If you applied for it in person then it takes 1 to 2 weeks.

i, too , did not change my name 
i just added him when he came to my deed and car insurance and so on
it really isn't a big issue as many USC's live together or marry and don't change their ID
for me it was more of a matter that i didn't want to change my name with:
bank accounts
SS card
mortgage and deed
credit card
inurance policies (car,  house,  life,  health)
utilitues
car titles
and all the other places 

We were CR-1.  We tried to get it a week she got here.  They could not find it.  We got the green card 4 weeks later, went back to SSA and then got a card a week later.   Honestly we were not in a rush.  Just wanted it so she could get a state ID.

Unless any information changed on the I-864, I wouldn’t submit a new one. For example, did you get a raise, did your annual salary increase or decrease, did you household size change. But if the only difference is you now have 2 more paystubs, I would just bring the paystubs. It’s not gonna matter much

I checked the profile and there has been no posts since this one. Ok so it was from May and I didn't notice, but still... I thought the info was useful in case anyone else was wondering.
Anyone know if the OP succeeded in their quest?

Agreed. Aside from the fact that USCIS is notoriously slow with ALL things; I can only imagine how much a pending vaccination waiver would slow your case down.

After a bit of googling, I found this on the website for the US Embassy in Australia:

If you are sincere about not wanting vaccinations, I find it interesting that you would then go and have them if your case gets denied ("Do you know if the application for vaccination waiver is rejected, if I can then take the vaccinations and have the case reopened?")
I personally would get an immigration lawyer as their experience would be much more helpful than anything I can google. You are likely to not be their first, nor their last applicant looking for a medical waiver on these grounds.
I would also think about spending $545 on a waiver due to not believing in vaccinations, only to change your mind later if the outcome isn't favorable.
All just my humble opinion, as always.

.. I guess no one has tried it then?
Would you have any news about this or any updates? I'm curious how it would work...

Hi, I'm about to apply for I-130 + I-865, and am about to go for medical exam.
I do not have my vaccination records with me, and I am strongly opposed to vaccinations (I think they're just wrong!)
I've found on the internet that:
If you have firmly held religious or moral beliefs that do not permit vaccinations and you oppose vaccinations in any form, you may still be eligible for immigration benefit. You will need to apply for a waiver of vaccination requirements by applying Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of Excludability, with fee.
My question is: has any tried to apply for this vaccination waiver? Do you know if the application for vaccination waiver is rejected, if I can then take the vaccinations and have the case reopened?
thanks!
Kelvin

You asked questions and you are getting answers;. It seems you do not like the answers that are being given,
With that I will tell you a little story that happened just this past week at my daughter's school. I got a call and a letter from the school stating that a student has been diagnosed with Pertussis ( whooping cough) highly contagious. Most likely from a kid who was not properly vaccinated or from a child who's parents are against vaccinations. As a parent, I feel that every child should be vaccinated. It protects the health of not only that child but everyone the child comes in contact with. IMO it is irresponsible to put others at risk and I would imagine the USA feels the same way. The letter I received explains what the symptoms are and to take your child to the doctor immediately if those symptoms show up. Also that if the child is infected, they have to take antibiotics, And the entire family should take the antibiotics too even if they show no symptoms. They also highly recommend getting revaccinated So for me, its not worth the stress.
You are free to practice any religion you wish ( yay USA) and to request a waiver. You stated that he just decided not to get any more vaccinations when he was 19. I am not sure his personal preference would be enough to get the waiver.. The USA has a right to say who enters just the same as your husband has the right to say what goes in his body

si creo que es mejor usar un cheque encima del formulario 

Solo comienzas con el formulario I-130, I-130A, y G-1145.. despues tal vez 3-6 meses ellos van a responder y entonces estara tiempo comunicar con el NVC y hacer los formularios de I-864, I-261 o 60.

Schools won't enroll without vaccinations so I assume home schooling is what is intended.
 

Unfortunately when it comes to immigration it won't be your choice anymore.

Im sorry I read all ur mocking comments, but this one is insane really.I have to ask- how exactly my "kids are bringing in diseases" if they have never been even ill? And I don't understand people like you- why would you even worry if your children are vaccinated (aren't they suppose to be protected) hmm..Not to vaccinate is my choice as for your kids is yours, and I'm totally ok with waterer u decide its good for them. You can inject them as many times as you like, if that makes you happy.And btw I'm not vaccinated as child but what a surprise - Im a live. 
Stay happy and healthy Mrs.
 

Getting in before this thread is locked.
 
It is visa fraud and illegal to enter the US with a visitor visa with the intent to marry, stay and adjust status. It will result in a lifetime ban for you. Period. End of story.
 
 
You cannot get around vaccinating your children, USCIS will not fall for your "religious" reasons for not doing so. There is a measles outbreak in this country and your children will not be admitted without them. Period. End of story.

Waiver is for the lack of vaccination.

Antivaxers have all been vaccinated as kids and they are obviously fine, but they think that vaccines will give their kids autism automatically. Like boom! One shot and you're autistic.  I'd rather have autistic child rather than a dead child. But hey, let OP do whatever she wants but hopefully she will not be allowed into the US without vaccinating her kids. Or do AoS since I guess she plans to use VWP and then AoS.

This is the 2nd Antivax post I have seen in almost 2 weeks now trying to get a waiver for "Religious Purposes". The other one wasn't to happy when I told him that there is a BIG movement going against Antivaxxers here in the USA now due to at least the Measles outbreak. 

What is your plan?  Unless you are awaiting your visas from the Embassy, you cannot just come here and then apply for green cards.  That is not how immigration in the US works.  
 
Get your kids vaccinated.  The risk from a vaccination is far far less than the risk if they get sick.  Lavender oil and blueberries won’t save their lives.  

Lol you cannot avoid vaccinations.
Sorry but spreadable diseases that are back due to antivax movement are a big problem in the US right now.  
 
Please dont claim religous believes because that's clearly a lie. Not to mention most school wont admit your kids without proof of vaccines. 

CHRISTIANITY
The bible teaches that there are unclean animals and that we are not to put the unclean into our bodies (Deuteronomy 14). – Vaccines are made from blood products and tissue of animals. (Read, ‘The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination $s not Immunization’ by Tim O’Shea for more on this).
Ye shall not eat of anything that dieth of itself; (Deuteronomy 14:21) and hut flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. (Genesis 9:4) – i.e. you should not be putting anything from an animal or its blood into your body.
What? Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own. For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's. (I Corinthians 6:19,20) – i.e. your body is a temple which houses the Holy Spirit and so you have to look after it and not pollute it.
'"We must obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29) – i.e. Vaccination is an artificial invention made by man to alter immune function. The immune system, on the other hand, is a natural function given by God to protect us from disease. Trusting in manmade vaccination is like saying that we think God didn’t make us correctly and that we need artificially ‘boosting’ in order to survive.
In the Book of Wisdom of Sirach (a section of the bible cut out by King James), Chapter 38,: verse 4 " The Lord has created medicines out of the earth and a sensible man will not refuse them." - God did not give us drugs, but He did give us plants and herbs and tells us to use them if we are 'sensible.' To be 'sensible' means to use your own mind and not follow man just because you are told to. This section of the bible was probably cut out because of its reference to natural medicines.
MORMONISM
Mormons also refer to the bible in conjunction with the book of Mormon, so the above passages should apply to them also. As well as this, their organisation has made it clear they are against termination of pregnancy, and it is known that MMR, MR, Rubella, Varicella (Chickenpox) and other vaccines contain human diploid cells cultured from aborted foetuses.
The First Presidency, which is the governing body and highest ranking quorum in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, has said, "Abortion must be considered one of the most revolting and sinful practices in this day." (First Presidency (Spencer W. Kimball, N. Eldon Tanner, Marion G. Romney), Priesthood Bulletin, Salt Lake City, Utah: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Feb. 1973, p. 1-2.
Clearly, if a Mormon then vaccinates their child with a vaccine containing aborted foetus, this constitutes a contradiction of faith. Their own founder, Joseph Smith, also stated: " Trust in God when sick, and live by faith and not by medicine or poison." (11th edition of the encyclopedia of Brittanica).
ROMAN CATHOLOCISM
Catholics also have the same stance on termination and vaccination:
They called the use of human foetal tissue in vaccination, ‘a kind of evil which is widespread in biomedical research and which people rightly think they should combat when they can.
‘The practice of medicine is being made parasitic on the evils of abortion and foetal experimentation and refusing vaccination is one way of seeking to turn medicine from a course which will increasingly subvert people’s confidence in it.’ (Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales, 1994).
JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES
Jehovah’s Witnesses have historically been against vaccination because it is contrary to scriptures, and their religion totally banned it up until 1952, although in more recent years they have stated it is up to the individual Jehovah’s Witness to decide: "As vaccination is a direct injection of animal matter in the blood stream, vaccination is a direct violation of the law of Jehovah God." (The Golden Age publication, 1935 April 2 p. 465).
"Oh, yes, serums vaccines, toxins, inoculations, are all -harmless', because the man who is selling them says so. You, my friends, believe this LIE, and continue to submit your body to these violations; then all I can say is, 'God have mercy on your soul'. All vaccination is unphysiological, a crime against nature." (Consolation 1939 May 31 p. 8).
‘Would it be proper to accept a vaccination or some other medical injection containing albumin derived from human blood? Witnesses have long realized that this is a matter for private decision in accord with each one’s Bible-trained conscience. Some Christians who feel that they can in good conscience accept such injections have noted that antibodies from the blood of a pregnant woman cross into the blood of the baby in her womb.” (The Watchtower, October 1, 1994).
The reason for this about turn? In 1952, when Jehovah’s Witnesses lifted the ban on vaccination, they wrote: "The matter of vaccination is one for the individual that has to face it to decide for himself. . . . And our Society cannot afford to be drawn into the affair legally or take the responsibility for the way the case turns out." (my emphasis – The Watchtower, 15 December 1952).
Essentially they still disagreed with vaccination but were too afraid of the medical profession taking legal action against them.
. BUDDHISM
Buddhists are vegetarians according to their religious believe and there is NO vaccine which is vegetarian. All vaccinations have to be cultured on animal and human tissue and blood products.
‘Scientists depend upon animal tissue to produce the viral strains found in vaccines. The Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine, for instance, contains live strains of each of these three viruses.’ (vegfamily.com).
You can easily find this information by going into your pharmacy and asking for a vaccine data sheet. Buddhists and others from vegetarian philosophies would be in conflict with vaccination.
JEWS
Jews also have strict dietary requirements as part of their religion and have to eat or take into the body, animal parts which are KOSHER.
Rabbi Simon Dahan recently highlighted this controversy with the latest bird flu scare, when it emerged that the bird flu vaccinations given to livestock may not be kosher, therefore rendering poultry products unsuitable for Jewish people:
“If they conduct the vaccination on the lungs or the neck, the animal might not be kosher anymore,” Dahan said.
“According to Talmudic laws if the oesophagus or the trachea is mutilated, the animal is not considered kosher anymore,” he added, considering that if the vaccination would be considered as some kind of mutilation by Jewish law. Furthermore, vaccinating the poultry in the leg might also be a problem because the operation might alter some the animal fragile nerves, which are supposed to stay untouched by the same Talmudic laws,” (European Jewish Press, February 2006).
Vaccines for people may also be made with animals that aren’t kosher, making them against Jewish law.
ISLAM
Allah says, “We have indeed created man in the best of moulds.” (95:4). The Arabic word in this verse is taqweem, which can be translated as mold, form, nature, constitution. Although this especially refers to the spiritual nature of man, it can also mean the mental and physical structure. There is no faulty in Allah’s creation. Allah gave man the purest and best nature, and perfection and balance are evident in man’s physical, mental, and spiritual composition. Allah, subhanahu wa ta’la, says,
“O mankind! What has made you careless concerning your Lord, the Most Generous? Who created you, fashioned you, and gave you due proportion; in whatever form He willed, He put you together.” (Qur’an 82:6-8).
Focusing on the physical aspect, one need only study the systems of the body to comprehend the significance of these verses and the wonder of Allah’s creation. The human body is composed of a number of specialized systems: the digestive system, the respiratory system, the nervous system, the muscular system, the blood circulation system, the skeleton, the skin, the senses, the immune system and so forth. Each one of these system is miraculous in nature and more amazing than any scientific advancement that man can achieve. (Sayyid Qutb, In the Shade of the Qur’an). Why then is man so heedless? Why does he overlook the wonders of his own constitution? Why does he neglect the One who gave him these special gifts? “O mankind! What has made you careless concerning our Lord, the Most Generous?” Why does he think that he can improve the perfect creation of Allah and make it work more effectively?
Concerning immunizations, this is exactly what humans are attempting to do. The assumption behind them is that the body is not “perfect” enough to withstand infectious diseases; that somehow Allah did not complete his job or carry it out well enough (astaghfir Allah); that the immune system is faulty and needs correction; that a young baby, as little as 1 or 2 months old, is somehow flawed, incomplete, and in need of human intervention to survive. All of these assumptions are erroneous and reflect a skepticism that should not be present in the belief system of a Muslim. This may seem like an intense subject for what would appear to be a straight forward issue, but a deeper level of analysis is required here. One cannot doubt the verses of the Qur’an highlighted above nor expect that he can accomplish more than Allah. As Muslims we should not fall into this kind of trap. We must believe in the perfection of Allah’s creation and understand that immunizations are in no way able to improve upon it. Chances are that they will only disturb the system and introduce an imperfection, (which is already being determined by research).
By Dr. Aisha Hamdan

i waived all the vaccines... i did not get any 1

I don't want to start here a discussion about the medical advantages or detriments of vaccinations. There are better places to discuss that (i.e. www.mercola.com). However one basic fact about vaccination seems to be misunderstood here by few posters claiming the requirement is to protect United States citizens from infectious deseases. If a foreign citizen caries an infection with her/him the vaccination will not heal that desease, it would be too late for that. Vaccination only protects during the time after not before. So if the person enters US after the vaccination those vaccines can only protect her/him from getting infected by US citizens.
The worst part with this requirement regardless if good or bad is that it chips on ones personal rights. It trains future US citizens to give up their rights right at the very begin by harassing them with lengthy processing times if they try execute their rights.