Over 42,000 Adverse Reaction Reports Revealed In First Batch Of Pfizer Vax Docs

[jg121783 3,907]

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/over-42000-adverse-reaction-reports-revealed-first-batch-pfizer-vax-docs

 

"The FDA's excruciatingly slow release of data related to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine has already borne fruit, and it's damning despite a trickle of just 500 pages per month out of 329,000 pages - which will take until 2076 to complete."

 

if it's so safe and effective why can't we see all the documentation until 2076?

Edited December 3, 2021 by jg121783

[Ban Hammer 12,842]

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

 

if it's so safe and effective why can't we see all the documentation until 2076?

interesting.  about a year before 23 oct 2077, when we will have TEOTWAWKI

[TBoneTX 43,064]

Even the current VAERS database contains probably 10% of the adverse effects at most, and perhaps as few as 1%.

[Dashinka 23,252]

2 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Even the current VAERS database contains probably 10% of the adverse effects at most, and perhaps as few as 1%.

Plus one wonders how they count things like this.  With Covid, if anyone has tested positive, even a blood stain on the road from a motorcycle accident, they are counted as a Covid death.  Do they count people that have heart attacks, etc. after getting an experimental vaccine similarly?

[jg121783 3,907]

1 minute ago, Dashinka said:

Plus one wonders how they count things like this.  With Covid, if anyone has tested positive, even a blood stain on the road from a motorcycle accident, they are counted as a Covid death.  Do they count people that have heart attacks, etc. after getting an experimental vaccine similarly?

Kind of interesting how they go out of their way to label everything a covid death while at the same time going out of their way to under report and marginalize vaccine side effects.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

That's about 0.0000905172 percent which is outstanding.  All vaccines have a small number of people that have adverse reactions.  No different with this one. To be fair compare adverse reactions to other vaccines per dose.

 

 

[Dashinka 23,252]

14 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

That's about 0.0000905172 percent which is outstanding.  All vaccines have a small number of people that have adverse reactions.  No different with this one. To be fair compare adverse reactions to other vaccines per dose.

 

 

So what are the long term effects of the vaccine?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

8 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

So what are the long term effects of the vaccine?

Possible impact of grammar skills.  I don't know. 

[jg121783 3,907]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Possible impact of grammar skills.  I don't know. 

No one knows.

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

3 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Even the current VAERS database contains probably 10% of the adverse effects at most, and perhaps as few as 1%.

So we agree the VAERS dB is not accurate. Why quote it then?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,315]

4 minutes ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

So we agree the VAERS dB is not accurate. Why quote it then?

Did you ever watch 50 first dates? I

 

 

Edited December 3, 2021 by Nature Boy 2.0

[Dashinka 23,252]

4 minutes ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

So we agree the VAERS dB is not accurate. Why quote it then?

What else is there?  I know, blind obedience is what we should give our Dear Leaders.

[TBoneTX 43,064]

13 minutes ago, Dashinka said:

What else is there?

I was going to say, that's all that there is except for anecdotal reports in the medical literature.

Edited December 3, 2021 by TBoneTX

[Dashinka 23,252]

4 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

I was going to say, that's all that there is except for anecdotal reports in the medical literature.

And with an experimental vaccine or drug, it should be guilty until proven innocent.

[jg121783 3,907]

25 minutes ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

So we agree the VAERS dB is not accurate. Why quote it then?

So you agree that adverse events are under reported then?