Over 42,000 Adverse Reaction Reports Revealed In First Batch Of Pfizer Vax Docs

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

53 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I think you need load, for your sarcasm detector 😁

Load AND pasalubong...

[TBoneTX 43,326]

Conservative calculations are discussed.

Quote

VAERS Data Indicates the Covid Vaccines Have Killed At Least 140,000 People

By Vasko Kohlmayer - December 9, 2021

 

To get an idea of just how dangerous the current Covid vaccines are, we only need to look at the numbers in the government-authorized VAERS database.  [...]

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/12/vaers_data_indicates_the_covid_vaccines_have_killed_at_least_140000_americans.html  

 

Edited December 12, 2021 by TBoneTX

[laylalex 7,253]

Here is the regular reminder about what VAERS is and is not:

 

Quote

 

Are all adverse events reported to VAERS caused by vaccines?

No. Some adverse events might be caused by vaccination and others might be coincidental and not related to vaccination. Just because an adverse event happened after a person received a vaccine does not mean the vaccine caused the adverse event.

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events following vaccination without judging the cause or seriousness of the event. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event, but it is good at detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of reporting that might indicate possible safety problems that need a closer look.

 

https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html

 

Science Magazine has a good article about this too -- Science is the magazine of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, an institution that has been around for nearly 150 years. Science (the magazine) itself has been around for a century and is considered one of the top academic, peer-reviewed journals in the world. 

https://www.science.org/content/article/antivaccine-activists-use-government-database-side-effects-scare-public

[yuna628 9,534]

Well after being injected for the third time with the devil's serum, I can say I'm still quite alive - a worrying side effect, as I was assured I'd be dead by now. 48hrs in my side effects are all the same as last (which did not kick in until the 14hr mark). Thankfully I've got the husband to look after me during moments I'm feeling especially cruddy and that included him saying "I will get you something from the store what do you want?" and me saying "all the things.." in a daze, and him coming home with a giant bag filled with cheetos, ice cream, tea, and wine gums.

 

I highly recommend the experience. It's trippy.

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,326]

7 hours ago, laylalex said:

Here is the regular reminder about what VAERS is and is not:

 

https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html

 

Science Magazine has a good article about this too -- Science is the magazine of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, an institution that has been around for nearly 150 years. Science (the magazine) itself has been around for a century and is considered one of the top academic, peer-reviewed journals in the world. 

https://www.science.org/content/article/antivaccine-activists-use-government-database-side-effects-scare-public

Da ja vu 

[TBoneTX 43,326]

13 hours ago, laylalex said:

what VAERS is and is not

Post is appreciated, but the referenced article's author explains the limitations and is careful to tread more than conservatively.

[Dashinka 23,329]

20 hours ago, laylalex said:

Here is the regular reminder about what VAERS is and is not:

 

https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html

 

Science Magazine has a good article about this too -- Science is the magazine of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, an institution that has been around for nearly 150 years. Science (the magazine) itself has been around for a century and is considered one of the top academic, peer-reviewed journals in the world. 

https://www.science.org/content/article/antivaccine-activists-use-government-database-side-effects-scare-public

Although true, with a brand new experimental vaccine, I would error toward the vaccine being the biggest cause until it can be proven otherwise.  Instead we get political posturing and labeling of those that may put more stock into these potential links as anti-vaxxx, a scourge to society, and generally irresponsible.  Of course as usual, these politics seems to be coming from one side, the Big Top fascist Party. 

[Dashinka 23,329]

13 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Da ja vu 

Did you read the article posted or just the headline.  The article clearly reviewed the limitations with the VAERS system, but given that, how do you explain the sharp rise of the number of reported deaths being reported that coincide with the introduction of an experimental vaccine?  Just a coincident?

[LIBrty4all 3,749]

For all the VAERS deniers out there...

 

 

 

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/pfizer-vaccine-data-on-adverse-events/

[Crtcl Rice Theory 2,432]

On 12/12/2021 at 10:35 PM, TBoneTX said:

Post is appreciated, but the referenced article's author explains the limitations and is careful to tread more than conservatively.

He feints a conservative story , And the goes on to concoct a made up extrapolated number that multiplies the reports by 36 due to "undereporting" and a "causality link" of 20% of the reports of death being caused by the vaccine. He doesn't know that either of those factors are close to accurate and is no more qualified to speak to the accuracy of these made up numbers than a high school statistics  student:

 

"Please keep in mind that the above is a very conservative estimate, which we have arrived at by assuming a 20 percent causality link in reported death entries in the VAERS database and the underreporting factor of 36. This, however, is likely a gross understatement of the actual situation."

[Dashinka 23,329]

2 hours ago, Crtcl Rice Theory said:

He feints a conservative story , And the goes on to concoct a made up extrapolated number that multiplies the reports by 36 due to "undereporting" and a "causality link" of 20% of the reports of death being caused by the vaccine. He doesn't know that either of those factors are close to accurate and is no more qualified to speak to the accuracy of these made up numbers than a high school statistics  student:

 

"Please keep in mind that the above is a very conservative estimate, which we have arrived at by assuming a 20 percent causality link in reported death entries in the VAERS database and the underreporting factor of 36. This, however, is likely a gross understatement of the actual situation."

Sounds like a hockey stick graph.