Jump to content
NANAQUEEN

Multiple limitations waiver

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I just got the request for additional evidence from uscis about my previous k1 happened within 2 years ago. The point is the current k1 i still applied for SAME person. We had trouble with new life together when we first lived together after the first K1. Then she left usa before the expired date and we didn’t get married. After that, I felt regretful to let her go so I convinced her to come back and i have been applying for the 2nd k1 for her. Now they ask me the waiver for this action and more evidence of relationship even i sent tons of images, gifts bills, engagement ring bill, messages, air tickets,.... I am not sure whether the previous k1 can affect our 2nd k1 even though I apply k1 for ONLY her until now. 

Anyone has experience.Plssssss help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: New Zealand
Timeline
10 hours ago, NANAQUEEN said:

They ask for the waver of multiple limitations applying for k1 and evidence of relationship

It makes sense they would want more evidence of your relationship, if you cancelled and then re-filed a petition for the same fiance.  You decided not to marry, but now want to - why?

 

And the multiple filer waiver is required even if both filings were for the same beneficiary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

You just write a short letter requesting a waiver for filing two petitions within two years.


Not a newbie but lost my old info years ago) I have been through this process before --all the way through naturalization-- This site has always been a great help to me. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
On 8/10/2019 at 5:07 PM, Jorgedig said:

It makes sense they would want more evidence of your relationship, if you cancelled and then re-filed a petition for the same fiance.  You decided not to marry, but now want to - why?

 

 

Not necessarily true.  USCIS is very objective in their decision making process.   The I129f approval process is literally a compliance checklist - are you free to marry, have you met within 2 years, etc, etc.   You meet the requirements of the checklist and your petition will be approved and sent to the embassy for the ability of the beneficiary to apply for a K1 visa.  The embassy at the interview might want to know why a couple decided not to marry the first time but have changed their mind now, but USCIS doesnt make judgment calls on the validity or whether a relationship is bonafide.   Just send them what they are asking for but be prepared for more questions at the embassy stage.

 

Edited by GP1977

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: New Zealand
Timeline
38 minutes ago, GP1977 said:

Not necessarily true.  USCIS is very objective in their decision making process.   The I129f approval process is literally a compliance checklist - are you free to marry, have you met within 2 years, etc, etc.   You meet the requirements of the checklist and your petition will be approved and sent to the embassy for the ability of the beneficiary to apply for a K1 visa.  The embassy at the interview might want to know why a couple decided not to marry the first time but have changed their mind now, but USCIS doesnt make judgment calls on the validity or whether a relationship is bonafide.   Just send them what they are asking for but be prepared for more questions at the embassy stage.

 

You’re refuting the facts of the OP’s case? USCIS DID in fact ask for more relationship evidence, as per the OP.  I didn’t make that up.

 

I was reiterating that in light of this being a  multiple filing situation, it attracted more scrutiny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
8 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

You’re refuting the facts of the OP’s case? USCIS DID in fact ask for more relationship evidence, as per the OP.  I didn’t make that up.

 

I was reiterating that in light of this being a  multiple filing situation, it attracted more scrutiny.

Ok I will make this easy for you. 

 

Show me one instance of an i129f petition where Uscis makes a judgment call on the validity of s relationship or whether it’s bonafode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: New Zealand
Timeline
Just now, GP1977 said:

Ok I will make this easy for you. 

 

Show me one instance of an i129f petition where Uscis makes a judgment call on the validity of s relationship or whether it’s bonafode.

No need for your snark.  I was simple going by what the OP stated was requested from USCIS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

Short of seeing the exact wording on the RFE we are at the mercy of the OPs interpretation which is likely mis-characterized 

Edited by payxibka

YMMV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
City: Nittany Lion Country Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

If she entered the US on a K1 visa and never got married USCIS would not really care, as long as she left before the 90 days was up.

 

The fact that you filed another I-129F within two years triggers a General Waiver to ensure that there were no domestic issues or that you didn't cop any DV charges.  If you did get any charges then you'll have to prove your case that you are not a serial abuser of these helpless foreign women (yes, that's sarcasm).

 

A general waiver is basically you stating the relationship ended, and that there were no legal issues (DV or otherwise).  

 

 

Edited by SmallTownPA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Old thread is now locked.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...