Jump to content

Boiler

Members
  • Posts

    77,803
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    326

Everything posted by Boiler

  1. They should not according to the regulations. We can take this to a further extreme, which I do not agree with, our friend Jim Hacking will tell you that you need 3 years of tax returns showing this $500k
  2. I self sponsored that is not normal I think I started by acknowledging you can always find an exception DCF as stated now requires a short notice job relocation not offer.
  3. I understand the reality, my family were bombed out but that was a few incidents over many years. More of how you would persuade someone that this is easily realizable at a given figure.
  4. As long as you have people with cash to buy
  5. Wonder what the property market is like, now there is a rabbit hole to go down....
  6. Well we have seen people reenter after a lot longer than 3 years but that option is gone. No insurance, and the more I think about it the less logical a bond etc would be, if you can afford a bond you can just meet the capital requirement
  7. Another good reason for U4U
  8. October has not been realised
  9. You can not run the numbers until the PD is current
  10. Could have sworn I read he did the I 407 and now cannot see it
  11. Thailand and Singapore Anyway they did so that is all that matters.
  12. You have limited time when you can edit a post. I am not sure how practical this is with very long wait times to get an appointment.
  13. I am missing their relevance to the questions you asked.
  14. I had to look up NEET, new one to me. He can apply whenever he wants, practically I believe there is a bit of a wait for appointments in India. Nothing goes away, all that typing will leave notes for further interviews.
  15. DCF is quicker but not quick, most of the cases I have seen the USC is back in the US by the time the interview happens.
  16. Most DCF cases the USC is already living in the US, a quicker route but I have never come across anything that suggests DCF avoids the normal I 864 requirements and can not think why there would be. I would not be so certain this can be pulled off twice, but all you can do is try.
  17. This is sort of related, and has become a big political issue in the UK and has developed a sport, I can see a TV show where teams have say an hour to remove as many Cameras as they can. I can not imagine the Cameras are cheap.
  18. I could see Tesla making more money reselling electricity than they could making cars and trucks. A couple of weeks ago I came across a sign that detailed the first road form California through Colorado, Coast to Rocky Mountains?, anyway calling it a road might be a stretch, more a collection of trails. As far as I can tell vehicles were mainly delivered by rail and operated in their local area, gas was bought from the local Pharmacy. I am in the boonies and even here the County Town has a couple of chargers, I attended an on site meeting last week and the County guy had a Hybrid, it seems the County are encouraged to buy EV's and Hybrids. All I know is I see more and more on the main drag, and of course these are just the ones that I can recognise. Something sharing the same body shape I probably will not.
  19. I am not going to question the OP, I have seen too many examples of things that can not happen, do not happen, happening. The safest route with no Joint Sponsor, no US sourced income and questionable savings is for the USC to head back first and get a job etc. Otherwise you go with what you have and see. The I 864 is a big ask from a Joint Sponsor perspective, I remember seeing why can there not be an an Insurer? being discusses a long time ago. I think showing 3x assets would be cheaper than any Insurance premium.
  20. We had a case a few weeks ago where the I 130 had been filled in incorrectly in many areas and I believe the plan is to start again. So my first thought is to check the I 130 and see if there are any other issues first. I helped a friend fill one out and OK I know a little bit but 2 sets of eyes are better and I had never filled one in before.
  21. You are not in the US, we are assuming you have no way of entering the US with the intent to immigrate. There are Dual Intent visa's but they seem unlikely from what you have posted so far.
×
×
  • Create New...