Family

I have been briefed on the shooting at Donald Trump's rally in Pennsylvania," Mr. Biden said in a statement. "I'm grateful to hear that he's safe and doing well. I'm praying for him and his family and for all those who were at the rally, as we await further information. Jill and I are grateful to the Secret Service for getting him to safety. There's no place for this kind of violence in America. We must unite as one nation to condemn it." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-rally-shooting-joe-biden-statement/

I-601 A for ULP/unlawful presence indicate EWI ( entry without inspection) in 99% of the cases. The rare exception is crew member IR , not likely here. The reality of most I-601 A applicants is that they have used/existed with some form of ‘chueco” SSN ( tax returns, paystubs) that are routinely disclosed/submitted for waiver approvals. This has NOT been an issue w USCIS or Consulates , your friend is ok.

In that case , you have correctly used the I-864 A. No need to redo form and no need to wait/delay response. Note vocab : use Petitioner /Sponsor =you. Household Member=mom Do : Response to RFE dated xyz, case no, A #’ Above ref RFE issued in error. Enclosed copy of the qualifying documentation as filed along with an updated asset statement from the I-864 A ‘asset qualified “ household member . 1. Petitioner/Sponsor I-864 as filed clearly indicates am not using earned income. 2. Copy of any available ( for petitioner/sponsor) IRS tax transcripts ( go online to IRS website and see if you can download whatever years they have } 3. Copy of Petitioner Sponsor most recently filed Federal Tax Return IRS 1040 ( if you did 2022 great, if not just say not required to file) 4. Copy of relationship between Petitioner/Sponsor and Household Member ( birth certificate for Pet) that shows mother/child 5 Copy of ANY mail in each name that shows shared residence 6. Updated Household Member ‘s Extensive liquid Assets portfolio totaling $$ Many Million , thus clearly exceeding poverty guidelines. ( here print out 12 months os statement or have broker write up a verification of balance letter). 7. Copy of household member 2022 taxes and official IRS extension for 2023 8. IF possible ( NOT required), get moms IRS transcripts from online and include. You will be fine. Just spell it out as outlined above, no reason to delay

Hackers stole almost everyone’s AT&T call records. What should you do? This is not a typical data breach. Here’s what you need to know. Another day, another data breach. But this one is nasty. AT&T said Friday that hackers who have hit other companies also swiped at least six months of 2022 phone records for almost everyone who had AT&T mobile service — that’s roughly 110 million customer accounts. AT&T said hackers don’t have the content of people’s calls or texts. For what AT&T says is a portion of those records, the stolen data also included some people’s estimated locations. The swiped location data is relatively unusual in a cyberattack, and it’s the part that freaked out Albert Fox Cahn, founder of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project. Your phone company logs the nearest cellular tower every time your device connects to its mobile network. That data is essentially a rough timeline and map of everywhere you go with your smartphone, including your home, work, house of worship, medical appointments and more. You can’t know for sure how this stolen AT&T information might be used against you. I’ll talk you through how to know if your data was swiped, what could go wrong and how to protect yourself. Also, take a moment to feel furious. This data theft shows the risks from America’s largely unregulated personal data harvesting. You, and generally not the companies, bear the burden when companies fail to secure your information from thieves. How do you know whether your phone records were stolen? AT&T said it will notify affected customers by text, email or physical mail. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/07/12/att-data-breach-hack-calls-texts-what-do/

Coming soon…😂 ‘It was horrifying’: Chutkan warns against complacency about Jan. 6 The judge in Trump’s federal election subversion case used a Friday sentencing in a relatively routine Jan. 6 case to issue the warning. Chutkan, who is also presiding over Donald Trump’s federal criminal case in Washington stemming from his efforts to subvert the 2020 election — culminating in the Jan. 6 violence — didn’t mention the former president in her remarks or give any hint as to how she will handle the case following the Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump is immune from prosecution for some of the events in question. But the Obama-appointed judge hinted at the possibility of future political strife as the 2024 election nears. She noted the “prospect of another election that promises to be — who knows?” appearing to stop herself before delivering a more detailed assessment https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/12/judge-warns-complacency-jan-6-capitol-riot-sentencing-00167841

In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, “There is a twisted irony in saying, as the majority does, that the person charged with ‘tak[ing] Care that the Laws be faithfully executed’ can break them with impunity.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Look up your congressman, fill out their case authorization form and email/call them for help . The congressional Liason will reach out to USCIS and get a written response and action from USCIS. ‘Write up a simple affidavit ( scanned signature of both of you) stating Withdrawal of Petition is USCIS Service Error. Neither petitioner nor beneficiary requested such , relationship is rock solid and we both intend to marry within 90 of beneficiary entry into US/

The RFE wording is boilerplate and does not walk you through the specific deficiency of your submission. The good news is that you have pinpointed the issue and can do a simple correction with your wealthy joint sponsor. 1. Do an I-864 for the joint sponsor ( I-864 A was wrong , it’s only for specific relatives that live w you). 2. It’s ok for them to have 2022 and proof of extension for 2023 ( three years of taxes is NOT required , just current year or most recent and proper extension). 3. Assets you listed are perfectly fine.

Penny wise, pound foolish 😂 to skimp on correct and good medicine , when you know what ails you.

Filing the N-336 is not complicated. Yes it does require a fee ( can even be done with fee waiver, for low income applicants) and is the most effective action, given OPs particular facts. …and no, it won’t take long or longer than starting all over.

You can DIY the N-336 if resources are an issue. Human errors and misinterpretation /reinterpretation /incorrect standards is par for the course ….so don’t take it heart. Fight to win 😂. You outlined your facts clearly in your post and all you need do via the N-336 is lodge the challenge . Complaining to supervisors, aka Service Motions ( without fee) were discontinued years ago, so don’t waste your response time window.

File the N-336 . You will win. Denial is a Service Error as nothing in the statute prohibits filing for naturalization while physically outside ( like for example a rentry permit ) For naturalization , temporary travel does not invalidate one’s established domicile/residence and you clearly meet all the residence and physical presence test.

There is also the option to seek temporary lodging accommodations in China to the city where DOT /daily testing can be done.

What’s DEI’s purpose? DEI has its roots in the 1960's anti-discrimination legislative movement when laws like the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 addressed labor issues based on protected classes. Companies had to comply with these anti-discrimination laws, and the DEI movement stems from these efforts to continue to create equitable workplaces and schools. “Somewhere around the late '80s, early '90s, people are realizing that simply trying to stop discriminating against different groups of people is not enough,” Foldy said. “The kind of ethos of those initiatives was to go beyond just avoiding discrimination and to actively changing organizations so that they were more welcoming and more inclusive.” And although the DEI acronym is in the spotlight, Foldy says, these initiatives are implemented under a plethora of different acronyms or names. Every DEI initiative may be run differently, experts say, but the overall goal is to make companies and leaders examine the way their company treats or serves marginalized groups. “Historically, there have been some groups of people who have had more access and control over resources, money, time, other people and the ability to affect policies, procedures, law,” said Opie. Dominance and privilege – understandably, those things are hard to give up,” Foldy said. “For the greater good, of not just a workplace, but for our country, our democracy, we have to become a country that equally and passionately welcomes all the people who live in the country.” https://abcnews.go.com/US/dei-programs/story?id=97004455

Conservative-backed group is creating a list of federal workers it suspects could resist Trump plans From his home office in small-town Kentucky, a seasoned political operative is quietly investigating scores of federal employees suspected of being hostile to the policies of Republican Donald Trump, a highly unusual and potentially chilling effort that dovetails with broader conservative preparations for a new White House. Tom Jones and his American Accountability Foundation are digging into the backgrounds, social media posts and commentary of key high-ranking government employees, starting with the Department of Homeland Security. They’re relying in part on tips from his network of conservative contacts, including workers. In a move that alarms some, they’re preparing to publish the findings online. With a $100,000 grant from the Heritage Foundation, the goal is to post 100 names of government workers to a website this summer to show a potential new administration who might be standing in the way of a second-term Trump agenda — and ripe for scrutiny, reclassifications, reassignments or firings. https://apnews.com/article/trump-biden-president-project-2025-33d3fc2999a74f4aa424f1128dca2d16

Total clickbait😂. A woman walks by as young YouTuber is pursuing a man who looks “ homeless “ and “brown”…to her it also appeared the YouTuber and man ‘s exchange was not friendly. ‘She had no clue it was a sting by the next Chris Hanson and just kept walking after making sure a homeless and or man of color was not being bullied. Surely a trad Christian woman would also Good Samaritan

True that…we have our own Timothy McVeighs , Supreme Leader Dindu Nuffin extremists ticked off at duh goobment deep state rebels 😂

I am all for extreme vetting 😂…heck some here even suggest the USC should pre vett ( what like send the future mother in law to take a crack ?) As for fixes, surely ANY measures would be better than the existent practice of doing nothing, saying nothing for years. Even a self policing channel of being able to challenge /appeal and second pair of eyes reviewed the determination , offered a chance to present evidence . ..or catch an internal boo boo…like my real estate Iranians Munoz got clipped because she allegedly did not meet the 2nd requirement of showing such right was “ deeply rooted in history “….but hey, history buffs will disagree 😂; https://reason.com/volokh/2024/06/24/the-supreme-courts-dubious-use-of-history-in-department-of-state-v-munoz/

https://www.aila.org/library/aila-president-responds-to-supreme-court-decision-in-department-of-state-v-munoz This is a disheartening decision that strips U.S. citizens of the ability to challenge an erroneous denial by a consular officer in a court of law. Although hopefully not the case, this decision could further embolden individual, non-attorney consular officers to act erratically as it strengthens the doctrine of nonreviewability. This lack of due process could unfairly deny many U.S. citizens the opportunity to live in this country with their spouses and will result in unnecessary family separations or subject the U.S. citizens to the arbitrariness of the immigration laws of other countries. As a nation of immigrants and a country where we value our right to be heard in a court of law, to say American citizens have no fundamental liberty interest in building a life with their spouse or their life partner in the United States is a staggering over-reach by the government. Life-altering decisions cannot be left solely in the hands of a bureaucrat and must be reviewable by a court of law.”

The USC citizen in Munoz case happens to be an attorney herself and this is likely the only reason she managed to take her fight all the way to the Supremes, most do not have the resources or stamina to fight the legal battle. The facts in her husband’s case are not the Ohh OMG a gang banger was trying to sneak in. Fellow had been living in the US , no rap sheet , he then married and dutifully tried the “ legal “ way . ..2010 to 2015 they did the I-130 consular process and he went merrily on his way in 2015 to attend interview… where he listened to the sounds of crickets for 3 years. Tattoos are an immense risk for anyone doing consular process…God forbid your ink is a Madonna , praying hands ..popular with Latinos. The amici nailed it on workload ( 30 interviews per hour is insane) lack of adequate training/supervisory review ( less than 10% of the required minimum and rubber stamping initial denial anyway) ..plus the inevitable bias and bad faith of your CO. A few years ago , two Iranian sisters ( each with husband and kids) went to Ankara for their F-4 immigrant visa interview. Both sisters (principals) and their children get approved and come to the US. Both husbands get put in AP…radio silence for over 2 years. ‘Finally , after congressman gets through, consulate says ‘National Security ‘ both husbands denied …and NOTHING they can do I am still scratching my head…why let the immediate family of suspected terrorists in… ‘

Yes, you can do this on your own…and help your son. I definitely say teach the boy to fish …rather than spoon feed him. ‘He needs a USCIS account on his own …and needs to understand his steps. ‘For example, once he files the free I-90 to correct error ( delay is ok , just say he did not know) …he should immediately apply for N-400 US citizenship, if he can learn civics test. Even you, no matter the separation, can go for N-400….What is holding you back ?

Boots on the ground report from your favorite True Blue Dem 😂. I attended graduation ceremonies at UCSD ..no pro hamas protester disruption . During the Dean’s speech , about 5 girls chanted free Palestine a few times, though barely audible. He paused briefly, acknowledged the right to peaceful protest , then went about his presentation. The next speaker was Al Gore , hurray for climate change…yup , I like the man ..but he is not a captivating public speaker . The 5 girls protesting got up and walked out ..a few of us in the family/friends section..called out Bye Bye!! and applauded their departure. They were gone and forgotten in seconds I really really wanted to shout BYE FELICIA 😂…

I must apologize. Your statement on common law partners for U4U is indeed out there. ..and I had not looked at the site for a bit. Everyone responding is assuming IR/ immediate relatives is constrained to the usual USCIS definition….not applicable in this case. You should try submitting the application for them and so you will have a chance to email back and forth w support https://www.uscis.gov/ukraine The Ukrainian citizen (or their non-Ukrainian immediate family member) who is outside the United States and who may be considered for parole under Uniting for Ukraine. Immediate family members in this process include: the spouse or common-law partner of a Ukrainian citizen; and their unmarried children under the age of 21. NOTE: If a child is under 18, they must be traveling with a parent or legal guardian in order to use this process.

Only if he Puts a Ring on It..and is married