Family

Your title reads “spouse” and your post “fiancé “…did you have a religious ceremony? How well do you know your fellow …have you met in person during the last 2 years? He is racking up balance that will need to be paid when exiting….you can check his amount due online . Is he asking you for money ? https://velocityglobal.com/resources/blog/saudi-arabia-labor-law/ SAUDI ARABIA LABOR LAW: GUIDE TO REFORMS AND EMPLOYMENT 17 January 2024 Recent labor law reform Saudi Arabia’s labor reforms focused on employee mobility. Resolution No. 51848/1442, which went into effect in March 2021, made it easier for employees to search for, change, and leave their jobs. Before the reforms, foreigners working in Saudi Arabia needed their employer’s permission to change jobs and complete other administrative tasks, such as opening a local bank account. Under Resolution No. 51848/1442, employees can now: Leave their job without their employer’s consent when the contract ends Leave their job before the contract expires if they have been in the country for a year and give their employer 90 days' notice Change their job within their first year of employment under certain conditions Use an electronic portal to see job offers, submit notifications, and input transfer requests Previously, foreign employees living and working in Saudi Arabia on an Iqama visa and work permit also couldn’t exit the country without permission from their employer. Now, they can access the Saudi government’s online portal to make their exit/re-entry request.

Steve Baker, a former Federal Trade Commission official now publishes the Baker Fraud Report newsletter https://mailchi.mp/ee2efd23d4e2/baker-fraud-report-7914491?e=115aca7ac6

Suspect tries to rob Sandusky bank using translator app Video released to the FOX 8 I-Teamshows Sandusky police arresting a man they say used a translator app to try and rob a local bank. The attempted robbery happened April 4 around 11:30 a.m. A man called police saying the suspect was in the bank, not talking and trying to get around the counter. The I-Team obtained bank security video that police says shows the suspect holding up his phone to the tellers. Police say the suspect did not speak English and was using a translator app to tell tellers “get the money” and “put the money in the bag.” When the tellers did not give him any money, he left. https://fox8.com/news/i-team/suspect-tries-to-rob-sandusky-bank-using-translator-app/

Are you working with the Military Liason ? Contact info in link https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/m-599.pdf https://www.uscis.gov/military/citizenship-for-military-family-members

The attorneys are more than happy to cash in on the I-601 A $ first…the reality of how many end up shocked /stranded and unprepared in CDJ is still high . Plenty of Facebook Spanish speaking groups give 1st hand accounts …hablo espanol 😂 At least OP attorney did a last minute CYA

All you need to do is the following: 1. Petitioner does his own FBI record that will show any arrests 2. Submit written request to Juvenile Court ( google is your friend) for name and date search .. He will get a custodian of record letter that says No Record Found 3. Send written request to arresting agency for police report. He will get a custodian of record letter that says No Record Found 4. Send copies of 1 -3 w I-129 F along w a SHORT detail sentence on last page of I-129 F “ On xy I was arrested /detained for xy hours . I recall appearing in court and completing approx xy hours of community service. I have no other records than those attached but recall being advised by court my disorderly conduct charge will not affect me if I obey all laws. I have no other law enforcement contacts , am a contributing member of my community “”

https://www.myvisajobs.com/reports/green-card/job-title/truck-driver/ Top Green Card Employers by Job Title: Truck Driver Rank Green Card Sponsor Green Card Petitions Average Salary 1 Mvt Services 122 $38,175 2 Cardinal Logistics Management 96 $51,780 3 Swifttransportation Co Of Az 83 $42,315 4 Polmax Dba Experior Transport 67 $62,109 5 Veriha Trucking 59 $52,956 6 Omega Compliance Solutions 56 $49,920 7 R B Duncan Son Lllp 50 $56,763 8 Harold Dickey Transport 44 $50,989 9 Go To Logistics 39 $54,288 10 Armellini Express Lines 33 $36,234 11 Thomas Sons Distributors 29 $47,840 12 Groendyke Transport

Living in the shadows is not a game. …as after 23 years one cannot even dream of Social Security or a catastrophic disability/ VJ does not have engagement on EWI/MX/EOIR /WAIVERS .. Walking around w Final orders is pretty scary cause they get executed without a chance to plead re-open sesame …

There is definitely going to be a wave soon, no matter what administration is in place in Nov. https://www.newsweek.com/map-shows-states-most-migrant-deportation-orders-1902529#:~:text=Latest Immigration Court records show,grown under the Biden administration. Latest Immigration Court records show that immigration judges are increasingly issuing removal orders. The first half of fiscal year 2024 saw 136,623 deportations – a 50 percent greater pace than peak removals in 2019 under Trump. The number of immigration judges has grown under the Biden administration. However, many recently completed cases began under the Trump administration, as cases take an average of 942 days to complete.

Between Mr. Pecker, The Porn and Little Pecker Underwear, The Fixer and The Preacher…..feels like this Florida Man headline hijack 😂 All boils down to our magnificent jury of peers. https://www.legit.ng/ask-legit/1531956-craziest-florida-man-headlines-meme-alive/ 3. Florida Man flees cops so fast that some of his clothes come off. So police identify him with DNA from his sock Read more: https://www.legit.ng/ask-legit/1531956-craziest-florida-man-headlines-meme-alive/ A Selection Of Probably The Craziest Florida Man Headlines https://www.boredpanda.com/hilarious-florida-man-headings/

What Must Prosecutors Prove in Trump’s NY Trial https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/what-must-prosecutors-prove-in-trump-s-ny-trial Steinglass, in his response, offered a meta-commentary. “I think there is a misperception about the law and about what this case is about,” he said. No kidding. Misperceptions about the law and this case have abounded since District Attorney Alvin Bragg handed up the indictment in March 2023, thanks to either the case’s novelty, a dearth of New York state law expertise outside of New York state, or both. In a recent piece for Lawfare, one of us attempted to clear up some of these misperceptions by charting the legal theory behind The People of the State of New York v. Donald Trump. While the indictment alleges no conspiracy, as Bove correctly mentioned, Bragg charged Trump under New York Penal Law § 175.10, falsifying business records in the first degree, a felony “stepped up” from the misdemeanor charge under § 175.05, by alleging that Trump cooked the books with the “intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof.” Justice Merchan has permitted the prosecution to pursue three theories related to that underlying crime, known as the object offense, but the prosecution seems to be zeroing in so far on one, in particular: New York Election Law § 17-152, a misdemeanor offense that prohibits “conspir[ing] to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.” As Steinglass said in court on April 23, “while it's true that there is no conspiracy in the second degree charge on the indictment, it is not true that a conspiracy has not always been alleged to be part of this case.” But even after laying out mechanics of the case as Bragg is prosecuting it, several questions—or misperceptions—remain. Chief among these questions are: Do prosecutors have to prove that Trump committed one of the three object offenses? And if so, does the jury have to agree on which one? And to what standard of evidence? In addressing these questions, we’re not aiming to endorse nor refute the prosecution’s legal theory, nor the case law around New York Penal Law § 175.10. Rather, we’re aiming to clear up a few “misperceptions.” Proving the Object Offense Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

Funny you bring that up….forensic KGB on its way into same forest Russia sends 2 planes, helicopter, and 50 personnel to Iran to assist in finding Raisi By JERUSALEM POST STAFF MAY 20, 2024 00:15 https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-801811

Respond with a copy of your DS-2054 as executed by panel physician . Note in your response that is the only document you were provided …and indicated if you already sent in a copy at original submission of I-485. Likely just a typo/data entry -human error …it will clear up with your response.

I may be jaded..but when the first official Iran outlets read “ hard landing”…my reaction was involuntary laughter .

Nothing you can file for the 18 year old…he is not coming . Mom can file an I-130 after she enters the US as an LPR. It will be an F-2 B category and take a very long time . https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2024/visa-bulletin-for-june-2024.html Family- Sponsored All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed CHINA-mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIPPINES F1 08JUL15 08JUL15 08JUL15 01JAN02 01MAR12 F2A 15NOV21 15NOV21 15NOV21 01FEB21 15NOV21 F2B 01APR16 01APR16 01APR16 08JUL04 22OCT11 F3 01MAR10 01MAR10 01MAR10 01DEC99 22AUG02 F4 22JUL07 22JUL07 15JAN06 01FEB01 01DEC03

Current income ( as supported by paystub) is the deciding factor. You can draft a letter/response to the 221(g) and upload it …along with updated paystubs /job letter….even though they are on record. It’s a waste of time effort to demand explanation from consulate. ‘To be effective you need to understand that you are income qualified and articulate it. They did not really make an error in telling you mom should have done I-864 ( for retirement income and assists )m..but it’s not worth hashing out …cause you don’t need it) Hopefully we see peace soon…

No need for Joint Sponsor or I-864 A mom’s income or assets. OP qualifies on her own through current; income. …regardless of past years tax return figures. Respond with updated paystub, job letter and strong statement that based on Petitioner/Sponsor current income qualification, there is no requirement for Joint Sponsor or Household Member’s income or assets.

If she has extended family in MX where she can comfortably wait out the I-601 after interview…the process does not have to be scary. ..and she will get approved…considering the I-601 A was granted . I understand it’s inconvenient…but she would be able to return as an LPR . ..there is no reform or amnesty in sight . If you have ever known friends /family or acquaintances that legalized after long stretches …first they want to do is visit home country. ..tell her to try looking at it as an extended holiday.

National Opioids Settlement National opioid settlements have been reached with defendants Janssen, Cardinal, McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart. This website provides copies of those agreements as well as additional documents and information concerning the proposed settlements. The agreements themselves control the terms of the settlements, and entities eligible to participate in the settlements should consult with counsel about participation. The site was created and is maintained by the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee https://nationalopioidsettlement.com

What happened at the border contacts and how CBP treated it can be found on the CBP FOIA . ‘You can update a copy ( black out name and info ) Can you please clarify WHERE she is doing her interview ? I assumed consular process and I-601 A…are we on same page ?

I am basing my response on her one entry being EWI /entry without inspection . ..but others have asked you to confirm , kindly do so. If she is CDJ/MX and any of her children EWI d ( before or after her)…then she will get the smuggling Inadmissibility . If from other South America countries…not so much risk. They void the I-601 A and she would wait in MX while a new I-601 is filed .

Tennessee v. Powell, Case No. I-CR-086639-B (Cir. Ct., Williamson County, Tenn., undated). In a criminal case in which Mr. Justice represents the defendant, the government filed a motion in limine to prohibit the defense from referring to the prosecution as “the government,” asserting it was prejudicial. Justice replied that such a ban would violate the first amendment, but went on to argue, that should the court agree with the government, er, the prosecution, what’s good for the goose should be good for the gander: Should this Court disagree, and feel inclined to let the parties basically pick their own designations and ban words, then the defense has a few additional suggestions for amending the speech code. First, the Defendant no longer wants to be called “the Defendant.” This rather archaic term of art, obviously has a fairly negative connotation. It unfairly demeans, and dehumanizes Mr. Donald Powell. The word “defendant” should be banned. At trial, Mr. Powell hereby demands be addressed only by his full name, preceded by the title “Mister.” Alternatively, he may be called simply “the Citizen Accused.” This latter title sounds more respectable than the criminal “Defendant.” The designation “That innocent man” would also be acceptable. Moreover, defense counsel does not wish to be referred to as a “lawyer,” or a “defense attorney.” Those terms are substantially more prejudicial than probative. See Tenn. R. Evid. 403. Rather, counsel for the Citizen Accused should be referred to primarily as the “Defender of the Innocent.” This title seems particularly appropriate, because every Citizen Accused is presumed innocent. Alternatively, counsel would also accept the designation “Guardian of the Realm.” Further, the Citizen Accused humbly requests an appropriate military title for his own representative, to match that of the opposing counsel. Whenever addressed by name, the name “Captain Justice” will be appropriate. While less impressive than “General,” still, the more humble term seems suitable. After all, the Captain represents only a Citizen Accused, whereas the General represents an entire State. Along these same lines, even the term “defense” does not sound very likeable. The whole idea of being defensive, comes across to most people as suspicious. So to prevent the jury from being unfairly misled by this ancient English terminology, the opposition to the Plaintiff hereby names itself “the Resistance.” Obviously, this terminology need only extend throughout the duration of the trial — not to any pre-trial motions. During its heroic struggle against the State, the Resistance goes on the attack, not just the defense. WHEREFORE, Captain Justice, Guardian of the Realm and Leader of the Resistance, primarily asks that the Court deny the State’s motion, as lacking legal basis. Alternatively, the Citizen Accused moves for an order in limine modifying the speech code as aforementioned, and requiring any other euphemisms and feel-good terms as the Court finds appropriate. https://lawhaha.com/legal-oddities/pleadings-and-other-documents/

If prior contacts at border resulted in VR / caught , printed and sent back there is no issue, She has only one entry. I can see atty cautioning for any number of other pitfalls…but no one would waste $$ on I-601 A with a 9 C history..on the books, so to speak. ‘