My case was dismissed

[Yehuda 26]

You can read it if you like. It's all public access. 

https://casetext.com/case/schwartz-v-united-states-dept-of-homeland-sec

[SalishSea 17,915]

12 minutes ago, Yehuda said:

You can read it if you like. It's all public access. 

https://casetext.com/case/schwartz-v-united-states-dept-of-homeland-sec

Makes sense.  Underlines the inherent problems with undertaking a WOM for a K-1.

 

We tend to be broken records here on VJ in recommending the spousal visa for good reason.

[Timona 4,207]

Thanks for reporting back regardless of the outcome. 

[Joe Kano 327]

9 hours ago, Yehuda said:

You can read it if you like. It's all public access. 

https://casetext.com/case/schwartz-v-united-states-dept-of-homeland-sec

At least you tried, I have lots of respect for people who have the inner strength to keep going when the odds are stacked against you.

[arken 4,197]

i found this the most important:
 

The fourth TRAC factor, which evaluates the impact of expediting the delayed action on other agency priorities, tips toward the Government. This factor carries great weight, and, “where a judicial order putting the petitioner at the head of the queue would simply move all others back one space and produce no net gain, ”

[dangime 12]

Sorry to hear this. I'm probably not far behind you in having a similar order sent down on a K1 WoM. My lawyer suggested we withdraw it awhile back while offering nothing in return, having gone from "we never lose these cases" to "we're going to lose this case". 

 

The central point they need to attack is if the state department withdrawing everyone when the vast majority of the world kept on working, just wearing masks or taking other precautions is really what needs to be done. I've worked with the public everyday through this mess, and needless to say if I had work from 2 years ago I hadn't finished yet, I wouldn't still be employed. Getting the government to admit it screwed up and exaggerated COVID is probably not possible for obvious political reasons.  

Edited September 16, 2021 by dangime

[Commish10 427]

3 hours ago, dangime said:

Sorry to hear this. I'm probably not far behind you in having a similar order sent down on a K1 WoM. My lawyer suggested we withdraw it awhile back while offering nothing in return, having gone from "we never lose these cases" to "we're going to lose this case". 

 

The central point they need to attack is if the state department withdrawing everyone when the vast majority of the world kept on working, just wearing masks or taking other precautions is really what needs to be done. I've worked with the public everyday through this mess, and needless to say if I had work from 2 years ago I hadn't finished yet, I wouldn't still be employed. Getting the government to admit it screwed up and exaggerated COVID is probably not possible for obvious political reasons.  

Did you join the Ramirez vs Blinkin suit?

[dangime 12]

30 minutes ago, Commish10 said:

Did you join the Ramirez vs Blinkin suit?

Nope. Case 1:21-cv-00252-RBW

DC

No new filings for two months but seeing the above I don't see how it goes my way.

 

 

 

Edited September 17, 2021 by dangime

[Joe & Jer 7]

This is the same judge that dismissed 'Milligan' a week earlier.  Not looking too good for 'Ramirez'.  Hope the lawyers for 'Ramirez did a better job of arguing that USEM deliberately slowed K1s to focus on other IV groups of the same priority tier. 

Edited September 18, 2021 by Joe & Jer

[Ontarkie 14,257]

~~Multiple posts derailing this thread have been removed. Stick to answering the OP~~