Question

[Abram&Ese 2]

My wife's case was put on hold due to covid 19. We received this email on Thursday. It's a day that we have been waiting for.. The letter clearly states what we should do and we are overjoyed.

The only problem we are having is/ if the red marking on the ds260 mark on the letter is a mistake. In my opinion it seems as though they were about to add something and decided to scratch it off. 

 

I would like for anyone else to advise us on their opinion once you look at the attachment. 

Thank you for your help...

[Chancy 6,233]

10 hours ago, Abram&Ese said:

I would like for anyone else to advise us on their opinion once you look at the attachment. 

 

Contact the embassy and ask.

 

[Abram&Ese 2]

2 hours ago, Chancy said:

 

Contact the embassy and ask 

 

I don't have a problem doing that. It's not what you said; its the way you said it. I can take constructive criticism; however, I feel a lot of you are rude to certain people on here amd certain people you respondto be better. Be blessed.

 

Mod. Just please delete and how do I get off of this site?

[Chancy 6,233]

24 minutes ago, Abram&Ese said:

I don't have a problem doing that. It's not what you said; its the way you said it. I can take constructive criticism; however, I feel a lot of you are rude to certain people on here amd certain people you respondto be better.

 

Aren't you reading too much into it?  There was no criticism in my comment.  I have no idea how you could take a simple suggestion as being rude.  People do come to this website not knowing that they can contact the embassy directly regarding their issue.

 

[payxibka 10,044]

9 minutes ago, Chancy said:

 

Aren't you reading too much into it?  There was no criticism in my comment.  I have no idea how you could take a simple suggestion as being rude.  People do come to this website not knowing that they can contact the embassy directly regarding their issue.

 

Agreed. 

 

I am assuming the OP wasn't going to be satisfied with anything less than  a spoon fed answer.  As an aside, OP is lucky I didn't answer.

[Chancy 6,233]

3 minutes ago, payxibka said:

OP is lucky I didn't answer.

 

That thought did cross my mind

 

[SalishSea 16,770]

2 hours ago, payxibka said:

Agreed. 

 

I am assuming the OP wasn't going to be satisfied with anything less than  a spoon fed answer.  As an aside, OP is lucky I didn't answer.

Dodged a bullet!  😅

[SusieQQQ 11,584]

This is presumably a rescheduled or delayed appointment. A new medical is required if it is longer than 6 months since the old one was done. A new/updated DS260 is required if it is longer than a year since the last one. It looks like they initially checked the DS260 box then tried to scratch it out - would have been clearer if they had used a black pen for that, but you can probably figure out what they need by how long ago you submitted the DS. Or, call them to clarify.

Edited July 5, 2021 by SusieQQQ

[SusieQQQ 11,584]

4 hours ago, Abram&Ese said:

how do I get off of this site?

You log out, close the browser and don’t open the page again?

[Mike E 11,723]

 

On 7/5/2021 at 11:15 AM, Chancy said:

On 7/5/2021 at 11:11 AM, payxibka said:

As an aside, OP is lucky I didn't answer.

 

That thought did cross my mind

 

 

VJ is littered with those who have shared this misfortune. 😂

 

On 7/4/2021 at 9:16 PM, Abram&Ese said:

My wife's case was put on hold due to covid 19. We received this email on Thursday. It's a day that we have been waiting for.. The letter clearly states what we should do and we are overjoyed.

The only problem we are having is/ if the red marking on the ds260 mark on the letter is a mistake. In my opinion it seems as though they were about to add something and decided to scratch it off. 

 

I would like for anyone else to advise us on their opinion once you look at the attachment. 

Thank you for your help...

If this were an election ballot, and I were a ballot counter, I would count this as a vote to send a new DS-260. If the intent was to not submit a new DS-260, then after making a mistake, the entire line would be crossed out.

Edited July 6, 2021 by Mike E

[TIO1 2]

Based on your interview date of February 2020 on your time-line it's possible the DS-260 was outlined to be requested because you would be beyond the one year requirement for action. With changes in law, it's possible it was crossed out as the form you submitted can be extended. I would check the status of my DS-260 online. If that doesn't clearly show a resolution, I agree to contact the Embassy for clarification.