Jump to content

43 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Just pick them up at immigration protests 

In a radio interview last year, an actual illegal said that very few illegals attend those protests... because most of them are too busy working.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
5 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

But you can give nuclear launch codes to a lunatic? Wow, what a country! 

Were you talking about Joe Biden?  Didn't he out the guy carrying the football at a campaign rally?

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Posted
12 hours ago, eieio said:

There is never a bad time or place to catch an illegal and deport them.( with compassion of course)

If it otherwise interferes with the administration of justice for all, then yes, there is a bad time and place. While the arrest and processing of undocumented persons is in the interests of justice, this must be balanced against the arguably greater need for court cases to proceed as efficiently as possible. On the one hand, if a person is subject to a deportation order, how much does the arrest of one person affect justice for us all? Does this one act help the wheels of justice turn more smoothly? On the other hand, if a person fears (even if that fear is not substantiated) deportation by showing up to testify in criminal proceedings, or for a settlement conference in a civil matter (to name but a couple of examples), how much will his or her absence affect the administration of justice for us all? There's a reason why the image of scales is a visual metonym for law -- it's always a balancing act. 

 

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, elmcitymaven said:

If it otherwise interferes with the administration of justice for all, then yes, there is a bad time and place. While the arrest and processing of undocumented persons is in the interests of justice, this must be balanced against the arguably greater need for court cases to proceed as efficiently as possible. On the one hand, if a person is subject to a deportation order, how much does the arrest of one person affect justice for us all? Does this one act help the wheels of justice turn more smoothly? On the other hand, if a person fears (even if that fear is not substantiated) deportation by showing up to testify in criminal proceedings, or for a settlement conference in a civil matter (to name but a couple of examples), how much will his or her absence affect the administration of justice for us all? There's a reason why the image of scales is a visual metonym for law -- it's always a balancing act. 

 

 

 

Also, the demand was made by the Chief Justice of the state, and the presumption should be that someone in her position would know what she's talking about. But speaking of these non-issues really take the focus away from the mess the administration is in. The so-called president himself said that the judiciary is responsible in case something goes wrong. It's not about abiding by the law, or even observing the constitution. The purpose is always to pass the blame and responsibility onto someone else, when the administration is unwilling to act within the law.

Edited by CaliCat
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, elmcitymaven said:

If it otherwise interferes with the administration of justice for all, then yes, there is a bad time and place. While the arrest and processing of undocumented persons is in the interests of justice, this must be balanced against the arguably greater need for court cases to proceed as efficiently as possible. On the one hand, if a person is subject to a deportation order, how much does the arrest of one person affect justice for us all? Does this one act help the wheels of justice turn more smoothly? On the other hand, if a person fears (even if that fear is not substantiated) deportation by showing up to testify in criminal proceedings, or for a settlement conference in a civil matter (to name but a couple of examples), how much will his or her absence affect the administration of justice for us all? There's a reason why the image of scales is a visual metonym for law -- it's always a balancing act. 

 

i was talking about illegals.

Posted
2 hours ago, eieio said:

i was talking about illegals.

Illegal what? That's an adjective, not a noun.

 

If you are referring to the arrest and processing of unauthorized aliens, also known as "illegal aliens," what I spoke of relates to these people. Nearly everyone in the US, regardless of immigration status, is entitled to due process. Stationing ICE near courthouses stymies due process, as I have laid out repeatedly above. But far be it from me to say that the state's chief justice knows better than you on this matter.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

Sanctuary Courts?

 

Concept seems odd.

 

So if say someone went to Court for a Speeding Ticket but there was a warrant on them for say murder they can not be touched?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
16 minutes ago, Boiler said:

So if say someone went to Court for a Speeding Ticket but there was a warrant on them for say murder they can not be touched?

Incorrect. I would hazard that you know it is incorrect as well.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
5 minutes ago, elmcitymaven said:

Incorrect. I would hazard that you know it is incorrect as well.

At the moment it is, but moving forward into the new world of sanctuary courts..

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Like what ?

 

Like almost everything from the moment he was inaugurated. Each day he shows us how unfit he is for the job.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/03/21/trumps-lies-are-failing-him-and-it-is-making-him-deeply-frustrated/?utm_term=.ce52495b4854

 

Trump’s lies are failing him, and it is making him deeply frustrated

The events of this week are revealing with a new level of clarity that President Trump and the White House have ventured far beyond unconventional levels of dishonesty. Instead, they are revealing on their part something more remarkable and challenging to our system: a kind of deep rot of bad faith — a profound contempt for democratic process and the possibility of agreement on shared reality — that is wildly beyond anything in recent memory and strains the limits of our political vocabulary.

 

You can also Google "Trump Lies" and you will find several entries from which to choose on the subject. Maybe you're not getting news from the US where you are, but if you tune into any of the US news outlets and websites you can find all the news you can read. 

Edited by CaliCat
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...