Jump to content
mjpnme

Can't be Deported if you have a child born in the US

 Share

52 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Thread moved from Effects of Major Changes to General Immigration Discussion -- OP as stated is a general question, not a personal situation.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

That's great that you have helped so many.

Please read what I posted. TOS-violating comment deleted - VJ Moderation

Point to anything I wrote as wrong.

The memo is not the law. Even a first year law student knows this.

ICE can use its discretion in deporting people. The memo did not change that.

No where did I say that a parent would be deported.

[There's a] difference between a policy that utilizes discretion versus the fact that the President cannot unilaterally change the law. [sentence edited by VJ Moderation]

Even by your own post, some parents have been removed. Therefore, having a USC child does not mean an illegal parent will not be deported.

TOS-violating comments deleted from one post, with acceptable portion returned above.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

[TOS-violating post, originally quoted here, is being deleted from the acceptable reply to it. -- VJ Moderation]

A lot of this depends on the mothers nationality. If you're a politician in a Latino community you won't get re-elected by the deportation of mothers of anchor babies. ICE will magically back off regardless of the law on the books.

Can the women be deported? Yes. Will she be deported? Maybe not. In this world it's not what you know but who you know.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

One member has been banned from the thread for TOS violations.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Iran
Timeline

Immigration is covered by federal law, the states have nothing to do with it. Google parent of USC child deported and you will see it does happen. The law says if you are here without status you are subject to being deported, it says nothing about only if you don't have USC children. Enforcement is where Obama has issued guidelines but he cannot change the law, only Congress can do that. Many people come to the US thinking that if they have a child born here they won't be made to leave and they have found that to be incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline

We have the law, then we have the practice, from I can gather, this can vary by locality. By a Supreme Court decision, and child born in the USA is a US citizen, regardless of parentage. And as such, cannot be deported. On the other hand, babies or children that came here illegally and not born here, can be deported.

This is what Obama is talking about, they know no other life and want to give them an opportunity to become US citizens, but not law yet.

What the practice is here, if illegals or undocumented personnel if you prefer to be politically correct, the father is deported, but they let the mother stay to care for the children. But she is not permitted to work. But the children, US citizens are permitted to receive Medicaid, welfare, WIC, and food stamps that somehow the mom is suppose to also live off of.

What happens to the mother, don't have the slightest idea after the children reach adulthood, all this is new and was a dead subject. Until President Bush made an issue out of undocumented personnel and gay marriages. Supposingly to get our minds off of Iraq, suddenly we have around 13 million undocumented personnel here, although I have no idea how they came up with this number.

But the whole deal is based on your place of birth, something none of us had any choice of. Our DOS takes this very seriously, like with my wife going through the entire process of immigration. Even against her will, has her place of birth on her US passport, and the only way she can visit her family in her home country, is to maintain citizenship in that country so she can get a passport of that country that she must have to visit.

But the DOS calls this dual naturalization, when it fact, it is dual citizenship, another contradiction. And even contrary to the oath of the USCIS. So she is not a citizen of the US just like she was born here.

Ha, can blame her grandfather for this, but her grandfather and my grandfather wanted to leave war-torn Europe for a better life, no different than the Pilgrims coming here. Her grandfather just happened to get on a boat for South, where my grandfather got on a boat to North America. But in fact, they only lived 300 miles apart in Europe.

So the only issue here, is, where were you born!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

Only children born to parents of legal status get citizenship here would solve this.

Then the whole family could be easily deported with no fuss, no muss, as well they should be.

November 14th, 2013: She's here!

December 12th, 2013: Picked up marriage license.

December 14th, 2013: Wedding

6gai.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please can someone tell me if this is true...someone told me that Obama passed a bill that an illegal immigrant could not be deported if they had children born in the US is this true?

so not true and i prayed it wont ever be true if this was to happen every illegal would have make babies just for this purpose..

Peårl £ûvs «Aåmïr»

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Just because President Obama issues a directive to an agency doesn't mean its an order. Its simply a formal request to comply. Does that mean every illegal immigrant with USC minor child will be safe absolutely not. Its a game of Russian roulette and I certainly wouldn't want to play. President Obama has been named the "deporter in chief" in several news articles. However under pressure Obama is reexamining the deportation procedure and may issue executive orders to make changes. When an executive order is issues then that becomes the new rule. Will this happen who knows....

On the flip side having a Minor USC child will help you in 18 or 21 years when the child can file the I-130 petition and the relative could obtain legal status through that. Hence the term Anchor baby.

There is an American island that has became a "tourist attraction" for mainly Chinese moms who are expecting, the company sells the whole shebang from flight to hospital and those children are born USC's, the parents return home and in a long time their children can apply for the I-130 to get their parents and relatives legal status. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2014/02/inside-saipans-industry-of-american-born-chinese-babies/

Edited by Jeremy12095
Link to comment
Share on other sites

at most, he issued an executive order to DHS ceasing the activity for a specified duration.

You should check into that, nowish.

It is still occurring though.

K1 from the Philippines
Arrival : 2011-09-08
Married : 2011-10-15
AOS
Date Card Received : 2012-07-13
EAD
Date Card Received : 2012-02-04

Sent ROC : 4-1-2014
Noa1 : 4-2-2014
Bio Complete : 4-18-2014
Approved : 6-24-2014

N-400 sent 2-13-2016
Bio Complete 3-14-2016
Interview
Oath Taking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never really subscribed to this theory. Yes, getting here legally is time-consuming and expensive, but once here, also affords you the means of going about your daily business without always having to look over your shoulder, and having to deal with the constant threat of discovery/deportation.

Folks that are so desperate to come here that, for example, picking fruit for a pittance represents a better opportunity than anything they have at home (not forgetting the extraordinarily risky business of jumping the border in the first place) have nothing but my sympathy - irrespective of the costly and drawn out way that I got here.

If Uncle Sam wants to keep them out, then he needs to do a better job at the border. Because once they've made it here, then good luck to them - God knows they need it.

Just my "progressive liberal" (LOL @ any non-tea party types being dubbed that) opinion, of course.

good.gif

I like the cut of your jib, sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

its not illegal to have a baby anywheres, when you give birth you give birth! But, having a

baby thinking it will gain you the right to stay in the USA based on the baby being

born here is not illegal either. What is illegal would be overstaying a VISA. If you dont

self deport eventually the government will deport you. Some people get attorneys

hoping that because they have a baby here, they can stay. But all they do is waste

money and hurt themselves for future plans on comming back to the USA for any

reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

In September 2013 Obama administration issued a policy telling immigration agents not to arrest and deport illegal immigrant parents of minor children.

http://www.alipac.us/f12/new-obama-policy-warns-agents-not-detain-illegal-immigrant-parents-286137/

I didn't know about this, and I must say as a tax-paying American I am disappointed. I'm also sure that this rule, as many other immigration policies, is liberalized. Whereas this policy says PARENTS, it doesn't discuss anything about situations where one parent is legal and a child's legal guardian but the other parent is illegal is a HUGE grey area in immigration "law." And is it really a law or a policy/directive. Who really knows. With only a few hundred thousand illegals removed out of the millions of illegals in this country that illegal parents compared to rapists, murders, car thieves, and drug dealers...deadbeat parents who are illegals simply seeking green cards are pretty low on the deporting queue. The bigger risk here that people miss is the billions of dollars we US taxpayers fork out to these illegals. The US is strong on anti-terrorism around the world, but these "immigration terrorists" are causing us BILLIONS. Yes, billions of dollars. This country has lost its way and diluted its population with blood sucking benefits abusers while our own US citizen children and benefit seeking individuals often go without needed support.

Sincerely,

VerySadGuy

30 year healthcare professional

Victim of heinous immigration romance scam

Father of a lovely little girl

And champion for those wronged by fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...