Jump to content

79 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted (edited)

Is there anybody here on this thread who can say with 100% accuracy that this "profession" would not be regarded at the Consular level as prostitution?

I can't. And I've been hanging around here for almost five years. It's my opinion this issue is potentially too critical for any of us to simply advise "careful wording" at the interview and when completing documents.

This is probably a subject better studied at the Consular level - meaning the petitioner and beneficiary should be sussing out how this subject is "viewed" by consular officers at their specific consulate.

Edited by rebeccajo
Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Is there anybody here on this thread who can say with 100% accuracy that this "profession" would not be regarded at the Consular level as prostitution?

I can't. And I've been hanging around here for almost five years. It's my opinion this issue is potentially too critical for any of us to simply advise "careful wording" at the interview and when completing documents.

This is probably a subject better studied at the Consular level - meaning the petitioner and beneficiary should be sussing out how this subject is "viewed" by consular officers at their specific consulate.

True, I completely agree. But I think it's a nice discussion. Another way to look at it is how she was designated on her contract? I am willing to bet that she will be listed as "entertainer". As for prostitution, I don't even understand why it's a ground for denial. 1. from a moral point of view, it personally doesn't bother me, and 2. really, it's hard to prove it. I'm pretty sure no one files their taxes stating that they are prostitutes. :whistle:

Adjustment of Status

11/03/10 ------- AoS (I-130/I-485) Package mailed out (Priority Mail)

11/07/10 ------- AoS Package received and singed for

11/10/10 ------- NOA1 received for I-130, I-485 and I-765 (emails)

11/12/10 ------- NOA1 received for I-130, I-485 and I-765 (hard copies)

11/12/10 ------- Touches on I-130, I-485 and I-765

11/19/10 ------- Biometrics appointment letter received

12/06/10 ------- RFE for I-693 (I think the issue is that it was not signed. Called USCIS and will receive a letter in a few days explaining)

12/13/10 ------- Biometrics done

12/16/10 ------- EAD card in production (email)

12/20/10 ------- Received "Letter of Explanation" for RFE (Service Request to expedite my case. Called USCIS and was told to ignore that and just send in response to RFE.)

12/22/10 ------- Touch (Email for Post Decision Activity on EAD saying that a letter of approval has been mailed out)

12/24/10 ------- Received EAD in the mail

12/27/10 ------- Applied for SSN

12/31/10 ------- Received Interview letter

01/03/11 ------- Received SSN card in the mail

01/07/11 ------- Mailed out response to RFE (I-693)

01/15/11 ------- Email confirming USCIS received RFE response

01/31/11 ------- Approved!

Pre-Adjustment of Status:

2006 -------- Met Online

02/07 ------- Visited him in the U.S. for what was suppose to be a few weeks (Came in with birth certificate and health card. Health card expired a few months after)

08/07 ------- Decided to get married because we didn't want to be apart (in the U.S.)

10/10 ------- USCIS Medical Done

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Is there anybody here on this thread who can say with 100% accuracy that this "profession" would not be regarded at the Consular level as prostitution?

I can't. And I've been hanging around here for almost five years. It's my opinion this issue is potentially too critical for any of us to simply advise "careful wording" at the interview and when completing documents.

This is probably a subject better studied at the Consular level - meaning the petitioner and beneficiary should be sussing out how this subject is "viewed" by consular officers at their specific consulate.

Interesting point(s). I've been following this thread and didn't think about how the consulate would view this, but it does seem possible that this could potentially be an issue at the consulate level, doesn't it?

Edited by rsn

K1: 01/15/2009 (mailed I-129F) - 06/23/2009 (visa received)

AOS: 08/08/2009 (mailed I-485, I-765, & I-131) - 10/29/2009 (received GC)

Posted
Is there anybody here on this thread who can say with 100% accuracy that this "profession" would not be regarded at the Consular level as prostitution?

I can't. And I've been hanging around here for almost five years. It's my opinion this issue is potentially too critical for any of us to simply advise "careful wording" at the interview and when completing documents.

This is probably a subject better studied at the Consular level - meaning the petitioner and beneficiary should be sussing out how this subject is "viewed" by consular officers at their specific consulate.

Interesting point(s). I've been following this thread and didn't think about how the consulate would view this, but it does seem possible that this could potentially be an issue at the consulate level, doesn't it?

They better be able to prove also, its a solid true courtship. If consulate does make a big parade of her "employment"

it could go the wrong way for them. Consulting a immigration attorney would be best. Also be best if she quits her employment if she is still working there.

Truly happy!!!

New life, new adventures, and a new attitude.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Is there anybody here on this thread who can say with 100% accuracy that this "profession" would not be regarded at the Consular level as prostitution?

I can't. And I've been hanging around here for almost five years. It's my opinion this issue is potentially too critical for any of us to simply advise "careful wording" at the interview and when completing documents.

This is probably a subject better studied at the Consular level - meaning the petitioner and beneficiary should be sussing out how this subject is "viewed" by consular officers at their specific consulate.

Interesting point(s). I've been following this thread and didn't think about how the consulate would view this, but it does seem possible that this could potentially be an issue at the consulate level, doesn't it?

They better be able to prove also, its a solid true courtship. If consulate does make a big parade of her "employment"

it could go the wrong way for them. Consulting a immigration attorney would be best. Also be best if she quits her employment if she is still working there.

Exactly right. We all know how Consulates see things in a very peculiar way. And, if they can apply this to the OP's case and consider her profession prostitutions or "unlawful comercialized vice" as the law states, the proverbial ####### will hit the fan.

What they will understand of the OP's fiance's profession is not something I would risk a guess. It can go either way; and the advise of a competent immigration attorney is needed. I would hate to see the OP denied. rebeccajo makes an excellent point. Again, it is not about what we think --- it's all up to the CO.

Posted
Is there anybody here on this thread who can say with 100% accuracy that this "profession" would not be regarded at the Consular level as prostitution?

I can't. And I've been hanging around here for almost five years. It's my opinion this issue is potentially too critical for any of us to simply advise "careful wording" at the interview and when completing documents.

This is probably a subject better studied at the Consular level - meaning the petitioner and beneficiary should be sussing out how this subject is "viewed" by consular officers at their specific consulate.

Interesting point(s). I've been following this thread and didn't think about how the consulate would view this, but it does seem possible that this could potentially be an issue at the consulate level, doesn't it?

They better be able to prove also, its a solid true courtship. If consulate does make a big parade of her "employment"

it could go the wrong way for them. Consulting a immigration attorney would be best. Also be best if she quits her employment if she is still working there.

Exactly right. We all know how Consulates see things in a very peculiar way. And, if they can apply this to the OP's case and consider her profession prostitutions or "unlawful comercialized vice" as the law states, the proverbial ####### will hit the fan.

What they will understand of the OP's fiance's profession is not something I would risk a guess. It can go either way; and the advise of a competent immigration attorney is needed. I would hate to see the OP denied. rebeccajo makes an excellent point. Again, it is not about what we think --- it's all up to the CO.

As You said Sister Len, this situation you cant friggin sugarcoat it!!! Best wishes to the OP and his girl!

Truly happy!!!

New life, new adventures, and a new attitude.

Filed: Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

If she was trying to get a visa from Ho Chi Minh or some place like that the CO would deny your visa. I would make it clear what she did for a living on the paperwork when you filed the CO cannot deny for anything the USCIS was aware of when they approved your visa. That doesn't mean they can't find a different reason to deny.

K-1 Visa

Event Date

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

I-129F Sent : 2008-03-25

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-04-05

I-129F NOA2 : 2008-08-04

Interview Date : 2008-11-06

Interview Result : Denied 2008-12-05

Round 2

IR-1 / CR-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Marriage : 2009-04-13

I-130 Sent : 2009-04-28

I-130 NOA1 : 2009-04-29

I-130 Approved : 2009-09-09

Packet 3 Received : 2009-10-05

Packet 4 Received : 2009-11-13

Interview Date : 2009-12-23

Interview Result : Approved

Visa Received : 2010-01-07

POE minneapolis 02-19-10

By my side happy everafter 02-19-10

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Jordan
Timeline
Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

If she was trying to get a visa from Ho Chi Minh or some place like that the CO would deny your visa. I would make it clear what she did for a living on the paperwork when you filed the CO cannot deny for anything the USCIS was aware of when they approved your visa. That doesn't mean they can't find a different reason to deny.

I was trying to remember where the case was that was similar to this one from last year or maybe earlier this year... a guy met his lady in a "exotic" club and the consulate gave them an extremely hard time, I think they were denied :unsure:...maybe it was Ho Chi Minh hmmm

"you fondle my trigger then you blame my gun"

Timeline: 13 month long journey from filing to visa in hand

If you were lucky and got an approval and reunion with your loved one rather quickly; Please refrain from telling people who waited 6+ months just to get out of a service center to "chill out" or to "stop whining" It's insensitive,and unecessary. Once you walk a mile in their shoes you will understand and be heard.

Thanks!

Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

I don't know what the embassy requirements are in the Czech Republic for police records for the beneficiary but if there are I'd have her get a police report to make sure she hasn't been arrested for something else.

K1 denied, K3/K4, CR-1/CR-2, AOS, ROC, Adoption, US citizenship and dual citizenship

!! ALL PAU!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

I don't know what the embassy requirements are in the Czech Republic for police records for the beneficiary but if there are I'd have her get a police report to make sure she hasn't been arrested for something else.

Posing hypothetical questions is ridiculous. "Do I know for certain that MOSCOW will not consider this prostitution...?" YES. This is not prostituion under Russian law, in fact Russian law on the matter is very vague and for years they had NO laws regarding prostitution at all. Officially it "did not exist" in Russia and there was no need to outlaw that which didn't exist. No, I am not joking. And I get that information from living in the FSU and not from hanging around VJ posting boards. I cannot imagine any Russian (or Ukrainian for that matter) police officer enforcing any such law if there was one, other than to extract a bribe from the prostitute, so there would be no arrest, no conviction, no record.

This is not HCMC or CasaBlanca or Lagos, it is Moscow. Moscow is not a particularly difficult consulate, it is not a high fraud country, they have no particular artificial morals they apply to people (which no one follows) and FSU men and women have a remarkably refreshing, realistic, view of the world in general and men and women in particular, and accept as "natural and normal" that which other societies gasp (theatrically) at.

I also know for certain he has no choice but to describe the way they met (actually he only needs to describe how they met IN PERSON) Her occupation is (likely) self employed. If not, he only needs to list the name and address of the employer by city and country. My wife's G-325a said "Fgrimini , Kiev Ukraine...Customer Service" Anyone care to tell me what she did? She could be a translator and customer liason (she was) or a prostitute (at least I don't think so) Yeah, right, your guess is as good as theirs and no one ever asked either. Job descriptions are not needed and she has no police record (presumably). She will have to produce a police certificate showing no convictions. If she has criminal convictions that is a another matter, not related to her job when he met her.

All the hand-wringers and worry warts can relax. Unless you are suggesting he LIE then he has no choice but to present the TRUTH in the best way possible and move ahead. The same as all of us. But I guess it is something else for someone to debate and worry about. Next question....

How many ghosts can dance on the head of a pin? The consulate in Moscow will have about as much interest in this.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

Ummm. Before I can give an educated opinion, you'll need to send me copies of your pre-engagement chat logs. All of 'em. Don't forget to include the screen caps, as well. :whistle:

:devil:

My Advice is usually based on "Worst Case Scenario" and what is written in the rules/laws/instructions. That is the way I roll... -Protect your Status - file before your I-94 expires.

WARNING: Phrases in this post may sound meaner than they were intended to be. Read the Adjudicator's Field Manual from USCIS

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

Ummm. Before I can give an educated opinion, you'll need to send me copies of your pre-engagement chat logs. All of 'em. Don't forget to include the screen caps, as well. :whistle:

:devil:

BOBBY...where have you been???????????? Did you bring your lovely bride back with you? :thumbs:

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Kenya
Timeline
Posted
The sordid thing is that i met my fiancee on a porn site, Streammate. She used to chat with guys and do private shows. We have decided to marry. We have made up our minds, so i am not asking for advice about that. Question is, should we lie on the K1 application and when she goes to her interview? We could make it vague, but what if they ask detailed questions during the interview? We did not break any laws and it was not a marriage broker site. We have good evidence for the relationship.

Anyone else met this way, pls PM me.

Should I get a lawyer before we file K1?

Thx

Ummm. Before I can give an educated opinion, you'll need to send me copies of your pre-engagement chat logs. All of 'em. Don't forget to include the screen caps, as well. :whistle:

:devil:

BOBBY...where have you been???????????? Did you bring your lovely bride back with you? :thumbs:

You know that she is still locked in the basement.

Phil (Lockport, near Chicago) and Alla (Lobnya, near Moscow)

As of Dec 7, 2009, now Zero miles apart (literally)!

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...