Boiler

Delay the process until you sort yourself out

The usual process is you fill in the DS150, you go to the interview, you are asked 2 0r 3 questions. I have not heard of anyone being asked how they get paid.

I thought you changed your mind and crossed it out, but agree unclear what the plan is.

Theoretically you could file a WoM, now whether that would be a good idea is another matter... Very difficult to comment with no information. Certainly something to consider.

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship.

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-6-part-b-chapter-3 Petitioner has recently naturalized – A petitioner and family member(s) have traveled for the immigrant visa interview, but the petitioner has naturalized and the family member(s) requires a new petition based on the petitioner’s citizenship.

Not sure I understand the plan.

Correct So what did you do, we are now in May

Airlines do not seem to like it, now with a K1 book the return out as far as possible in case you want to use it and have AP. Otherwise remember to cancel the return unless the system mistakenly thinks you used it.

LDRs are EXPENSIVE and in your case you have not even met. Not sure I understand the point of a B, you can not afford to visit?, and the chances of getting one with your situation and prior refusal are vanishingly small. Perhaps wait and see, until you can meet and then see how it goes.

And nothing was done for the child?

True but quite normal. We have to guess.

You need to file the I 130 you may well need to explain what the plan is, are your sponsoring the other parent?

Could you employ a local Lawyer to act on your behalf. Obviously guessing as I do not know the details.

I must admit it sounded more like you are 16, you are not going anywhere without a Passport. You mentioned access to the VWP so you are obviously from a Country where you can take control of your life.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Visa-Reciprocity-and-Civil-Documents-by-Country.html You can see what is available here. What have you done so far?

Needs a qualifying relative to file a waiver and that would not be you until you got your GC. Now I am not sure if say both of you went to the interview, you were approved she was not, you enter and get your I 551 stamp can you then file a waiver based on the Employer filing? I 601 take bout 2 years anyway and if you have to sponsor her and then file a waiver more like 6. Putting together a waiver could also be interesting when you just got there.

They make the blades north of Denver and you can see them being shipped by Train, massive and also light. No way could you practically make them to withstand that bit then again an oil rig is going to have issues. We had a wind warning yesterday and looks like today as well, not a good time to be driving a semi with a empty trailer, I have seen those flip but we do get the attention. We have had an OK snow winter, nothing massive but last 2 years have been low, and it has not been that hot so far reducing the demand from the Front Range. The UK had a wet winter, worst since 1948, die apparently to Global Warming which begs the question what happened in 1948.

See my implode comment. Now the Labour of my Father and Grandfathers era was a working class based party, Harold Wilson etc. Now it has much more in common with the Dems, so yes you have your Guardianistas section who think the EU is wonderful, second house in Tuscany etc, and then you have the more traditional element who have been impacted by the driving down of wages etc. So if you are a Labour leader you say nice things to both and do nothing. Lets say they decided they wanted to rejoin, now as I have implied that would get very nasty and more importantly would take much longer than a Parliamentary term. And it is not a given terms could be agreed.

Sort of, well no different to the US, the Tories have had a very long run and certainly the last few years have been awful. Outstayed any welcome they had. Now Labour have some super crazies and tend to implode quicker so last one maybe two terms.

These people are CRAZY

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/article/2024/may/22/rishi-sunak-will-call-general-election-for-july-in-surprise-move-sources Rishi Sunak has called a surprise general election for 4 July in a high stakes gamble that will see Keir Starmer try to win power for Labour after 14 years of Conservative-led government. Addressing the nation outside Downing Street, Sunak said it was “the moment for Britain to choose its future” as he claimed the Tories could be trusted to lead the country during a time of global instability. The rain-soaked prime minister was almost drowned out by the New Labour anthem, D:Ream’s Things Can Only Get Better, blasted out by the anti-Brexit campaigner Steve Bray, as the surprise early election was called. Sunak’s words were met with alarm by senior Tories who are concerned that their party, trailing 20 percentage points behind Labour in the polls, could face electoral wipeout, with some MPs even considering submitting letters of no confidence. Well I am pretty sure that it is not to overshadow the US Holiday and obviously it is a different timeline to the US. I fully expect the Tories to get spanked but by how much?

You have to laugh is she really this stupid?

Never forget

I still cannot remember what that clause also covers, only come across it a couple of times being used for non obvious issues. Sadly the VJ search function is down as I remember a few years back a similar sort of case but cannot find it, do not remember the details. Maybe it will pop into my brain cell but hopefully the Lawyer will know what the issue is. And you can remind me.