EA and MK
-
Posts
167 -
Joined
Reputation Activity
-
EA and MK got a reaction from appleblossom in Born U.S. Citizen: Can Past Marriage Block New Spouse Petitions Under INA 204(c)?
Why is marriage fraud something you're even concerned about? What is causing you to even remotely think that is an issue? At face value, i honestly don't see what the big deal is? Just withdraw the old I-130 and submit a new one for your current relationship. Or, as other users pointed you to do, contact your congressman and see what USCIS can advise about your prior case status. You'll probably be under more scrutiny to prove your relationship, but if it is genuine there is nothing to worry about.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from TBoneTX in I601 requirements
I would encourage you to read form I-601 instruction, page 12 in particular, which you can find on the USCIS website. You will need to hire a lawyer that specializes in I-601s. But the facts used to prove extreme hardship for the 601 need to come from your dad, the petitioner.
But essentially - Your mom must demonstrate that her qualifying relative (U.S. citizen/LPR petitioner) will suffer "extreme hardship" if she is not admitted. There is no getting around this, and is always required for an I-602 response.
Extreme hardship is a difficult standard to satisfy. Per USCIS: Common results of removal or separation — such as sadness, missing a spouse, difficulty adjusting — are expected and therefore not “extreme” by themselves. Therefore, the hardship waiver must be well-documented and carefully prepared. Again, emotional hardship is not extreme hardship.
For the unlawful presence, the inadmissibility expired February 2026. You'll need to confirm if that's accurate, otherwise you'll also need to include it in the 601.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Dashinka in I601 requirements
I would encourage you to read form I-601 instruction, page 12 in particular, which you can find on the USCIS website. You will need to hire a lawyer that specializes in I-601s. But the facts used to prove extreme hardship for the 601 need to come from your dad, the petitioner.
But essentially - Your mom must demonstrate that her qualifying relative (U.S. citizen/LPR petitioner) will suffer "extreme hardship" if she is not admitted. There is no getting around this, and is always required for an I-602 response.
Extreme hardship is a difficult standard to satisfy. Per USCIS: Common results of removal or separation — such as sadness, missing a spouse, difficulty adjusting — are expected and therefore not “extreme” by themselves. Therefore, the hardship waiver must be well-documented and carefully prepared. Again, emotional hardship is not extreme hardship.
For the unlawful presence, the inadmissibility expired February 2026. You'll need to confirm if that's accurate, otherwise you'll also need to include it in the 601.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from appleblossom in I601 requirements
I would encourage you to read form I-601 instruction, page 12 in particular, which you can find on the USCIS website. You will need to hire a lawyer that specializes in I-601s. But the facts used to prove extreme hardship for the 601 need to come from your dad, the petitioner.
But essentially - Your mom must demonstrate that her qualifying relative (U.S. citizen/LPR petitioner) will suffer "extreme hardship" if she is not admitted. There is no getting around this, and is always required for an I-602 response.
Extreme hardship is a difficult standard to satisfy. Per USCIS: Common results of removal or separation — such as sadness, missing a spouse, difficulty adjusting — are expected and therefore not “extreme” by themselves. Therefore, the hardship waiver must be well-documented and carefully prepared. Again, emotional hardship is not extreme hardship.
For the unlawful presence, the inadmissibility expired February 2026. You'll need to confirm if that's accurate, otherwise you'll also need to include it in the 601.
-
EA and MK reacted to TBoneTX in N-400 Interview Has Not Been Rescheduled Since it Was Cancelled in July 2025
Sorry to hear this. Contact your U.S. Congressman's office (D.C. office) and consult with the Immigration Liaison staff member. Let us know what results.
-
EA and MK reacted to JeanneAdil in Is it ok to resubmit the same translations of Birth and Marriage Certificate for N-400?
can only say it should be exactly the same
one member took a different translation to an interview and had to wait for a copy of the original translation to be produced
translators do not always use the exact same language so use the ones for the I 130 to be safe
-
EA and MK reacted to OldUser in Is it ok to resubmit the same translations of Birth and Marriage Certificate for N-400?
Yes, it's OK to submit the same. Whose birth certificate it is? If applicant's it's not required.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Crazy Cat in Preparing N-400 for Submission With Prior DS-260 Errors
Hey @Crazy Cat, hope you e been doing well.
Absolutely, we're not hiring a lawyer for the N-400. There's really zero need unless you have a complex case, which ours is as vanilla as can be lol.
-
EA and MK reacted to OldUser in Preparing N-400 for Submission With Prior DS-260 Errors
It shouldn't.
Make sure to give all correct answers on N-400. Check form multiple times before submitting.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Snowwhite1811 in Biometrics Appointment after Greencard was produced
Don't worry. Happened to my wife. They "lost" her biometrics. Go in, get your biometrics, and within a week you should see your new GC in the mail.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from KseniyaG in DS 260 Social Media Question
Put whatever is after the main URL. For example,
www.facebook.com/username
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Boiler in Declaring UK Criminal History
Since a caution is not a conviction, the only item you need to sincerely and truthfully answer about your incident is whether your arrest was because you caused serious damage to property or serious harm to a person. If your actions that got you arrested resulted in neither , then I don't know why people here are saying this could be misrep.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Lemonslice in Declaring UK Criminal History
Since a caution is not a conviction, the only item you need to sincerely and truthfully answer about your incident is whether your arrest was because you caused serious damage to property or serious harm to a person. If your actions that got you arrested resulted in neither , then I don't know why people here are saying this could be misrep.
-
EA and MK reacted to milimelo in Kind of Complex Question: Father in Law's DS-160 Security Question and Prior Employment in National Police
Yes, correct approach.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Danmuji in n400 - 3 year rule and marital union requirement
My understanding of the USCIS policy manual includes exceptions for not meeting the marital union requirement, including:
1) Required to serve in the armed forces
2) Required travel and relocation for employment.
It will be at the interviewing officer's discretion to evaluate if an exception can be made by evidence and proof you provide.
Is your wife employed and had to leave as a result?
Also, I don't want to be rude but I did not like the vibe you give off when you state "...the State Dept doesn't track the travel history of US citizens". Or when you state "I could admit ignorance". This sounds like you are trying to che the system and get away with something. Like pulling a fast one/hoping they don't catch yout. Sate Dept may not track US Citizens travel history, but DHS/CBP most certainly do. Just do things right the first time, and with full honesty. This is the only way to ensure success with US immigration.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from EireneFaith in Denied entry at SEATAC & B1/B2 Visa Revoked - What Next?
Honestly, you don't need a lawyer. I had a lawyer, and they make so many mistakes that add extraordinary levels of stress. Not to mention they take thousands of dollars from you.
This is how it will go down: you need to pay them and fill out an "intake sheet" with all biographical information about you, your wife, kids, etc. They will then ask you to compile all relevant evidence. They will then literally transcribe the info you provide them to the I-130 and I-130A. That's all they do. Then you will get charged again for them to transcribe that same info to DS-260 and I-864. Now, will it be done right? Not always; they may make typos or miss info and you may not even get a chance to review until after they sent the packet.
If you wanna throw money away try an American lawyer. They will need to fill out G-28 and I don't think they can if they aren't registered with a US State bar.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from EireneFaith in Denied entry at SEATAC & B1/B2 Visa Revoked - What Next?
I don't know who told you this was a good idea, but (not trying to be rude) stop listening to con artists. You only get one chance to establish a trustworthy relationship with the US government. Trying to pull this nonsense will eventually lead to trying to do other crazy things that eventually will get your wife banned permanently. And only cause someone said it was a "good" idea. There are great tools and resources available on this site to help navigate the petition process. Read and follow that.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from EireneFaith in Denied entry at SEATAC & B1/B2 Visa Revoked - What Next?
I strongly advise you do your own research and file your own petition. A lawyer already caused problems for you! And they've caused me and others issues too. It's not a challenging process, but requires you to be meticulous and to the point.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Aluvaboy in Obtaining legal status
This is why it's hard on people actually coming to visit to get a B1/B2 visa. This behavior of, "coming for a better life" does not allow someone to violate US immigration law.
He has committed a crime by using his visitor visa to study and to work. The consequence is cancellation of his visa and no longer qualifying for a non-immigrant visa. He can absolutely see his daughter, and not leave her behind, BY GOING BACK! If someday you'd like to marry, you can petition for him. But in the mean time, he needs to exit before he is banned and making it that much more difficult to qualify for an immigrant visa.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from Dashinka in Denied entry at SEATAC & B1/B2 Visa Revoked - What Next?
Honestly, you don't need a lawyer. I had a lawyer, and they make so many mistakes that add extraordinary levels of stress. Not to mention they take thousands of dollars from you.
This is how it will go down: you need to pay them and fill out an "intake sheet" with all biographical information about you, your wife, kids, etc. They will then ask you to compile all relevant evidence. They will then literally transcribe the info you provide them to the I-130 and I-130A. That's all they do. Then you will get charged again for them to transcribe that same info to DS-260 and I-864. Now, will it be done right? Not always; they may make typos or miss info and you may not even get a chance to review until after they sent the packet.
If you wanna throw money away try an American lawyer. They will need to fill out G-28 and I don't think they can if they aren't registered with a US State bar.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from DeParaquedasBrasi in Denied entry at SEATAC & B1/B2 Visa Revoked - What Next?
I don't know who told you this was a good idea, but (not trying to be rude) stop listening to con artists. You only get one chance to establish a trustworthy relationship with the US government. Trying to pull this nonsense will eventually lead to trying to do other crazy things that eventually will get your wife banned permanently. And only cause someone said it was a "good" idea. There are great tools and resources available on this site to help navigate the petition process. Read and follow that.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from seanpham in Does capital loss affect financial requirements for CR1 Visa?
Where are you in the process? Is your case at the embassy and awaiting an interview or are you just now getting started?
-
EA and MK got a reaction from David & Paulyn in Denied entry at SEATAC & B1/B2 Visa Revoked - What Next?
I don't know who told you this was a good idea, but (not trying to be rude) stop listening to con artists. You only get one chance to establish a trustworthy relationship with the US government. Trying to pull this nonsense will eventually lead to trying to do other crazy things that eventually will get your wife banned permanently. And only cause someone said it was a "good" idea. There are great tools and resources available on this site to help navigate the petition process. Read and follow that.
-
EA and MK got a reaction from PaulaCJohnny in Adding spouse to ds 260 Derivative beneficiary (spouse) (Merged)
Understood. I think it may be difficult to add you this late in the stage. Typically, yes she should have been able to add you as a derivative beneficiary. You can make this change from the case summary page’s status chart. Go to the list of visa applicants under “Applicant Information”, click on the drop down box and select either “follow-to-join” if you’d like the derivative to travel later, or “accompanying” if you’d like the derivative to travel with you. The change will be reflected one or two hours after making the selection.
If you want to add a derivative but already had your Embassy interview scheduled, you must let the Embassy know before the interview. You will still need to complete all required processes – their own application, civil documents, medical exam, VAC visit, and pay all required fees.
Option 2: Since she already had her interview and traveling in such a short period of time, she may need to enter the US with her EB-3, become an LPR, and then petition for you. Unfortunately, this is a bit lengthy.
Did you get married after her DS-260 got filed? I'm so sorry, but it seems like option 2 is gonna be the one to go with. Really wish you had asked sooner so we could have advised sooner!
Perhaps other members may have more information...
-
EA and MK reacted to arken in Adding spouse to ds 260 Derivative beneficiary (spouse) (Merged)
This. The visa is issued so the case is closed.
OP:
The only way to have the ceac reactivated for adding a derivative is by contacting the embassy. Since it's been 2 months you (presumably your wife) contacted the embassy, it just shows how backlogged they are. May be follow up again and be very specific on why adding the derivative. Once they activate your wife's profile, she will add you, fill up the DS260, upload your related civil docs. The Embassy will review that and schedule an interview. Overall it will take several months. Not sure when your wife's visa expires, she has to travel before the expiry daye. You can still get interviewed later and get the same EB based derivative Visa.
