DennisWaldron

All went well.
Visa issued. 
 
Thanks 

All went well.
Visa issued. 
 
Thanks 

Thank you all for the replies. 
 
Though they wouldn't entertain the idea of an aka with an alias she hasn't used, Today We were able to at least add my name as spouse. With copy of marriage certificate. 
 
The 221g says
AKA NBI "with husbands last name listed"
 
Will submit tomorrow.  I'll let you know how we make out.
 
Thanks again for the input 👍 
 

All went well.
Visa issued. 
 
Thanks 

All went well.
Visa issued. 
 
Thanks 

All went well.
Visa issued. 
 
Thanks 

Might be on to something here... as odd as it sounds, i couldn't upload anything using my desktop. ( i7-4770 w/windows 8 )
 
Switched to laptop ( i3-6100 w/windows 10) and everything went flawlessly.  Even the random log off stopped.
 
 
 

I develop web applications and see these kind of bugs all the time - once I developed a file upload feature on MacOS and the windows users were not able to upload any files on it. CEAC web application is most likely developed and hosted on windows.

Yeah definitely a bit fustrating.  
Just find it odd i haven't been able to upload 1 single document in the civil part of it.
 

Approved 
Noa1 July 16
Approved March 5th
 

Thanks,
Potomac 

Approved 
Noa1 July 16
Approved March 5th
 

Approved 
Noa1 July 16
Approved March 5th
 

Approved 
Noa1 July 16
Approved March 5th
 

Approved 
Noa1 July 16
Approved March 5th
 

We received the hard copy today. 
We are Potomac also.
Seems everyone in july is ioe?
I'd feel better about the ioe if i could find one case that's actually made it to NVC.
I'm only seeing/finding ioe #'s being approved in 2 months, And then not making it to nvc.
The few i have found (approved in march and april) they have been in limbo for 3 or 4 months now. 
 

Recieved receipt # through text yesterday 7/17. We are also an IOE #
Waiting hard copy to know the service center.
I know some centers are moving faster with the normal process.
And I'm hearing that this IOE electronic processing is supposedly fast. 
But For processing times With the IOE # does it matter which service center we get?
 

We received the hard copy today. 
We are Potomac also.
Seems everyone in july is ioe?
I'd feel better about the ioe if i could find one case that's actually made it to NVC.
I'm only seeing/finding ioe #'s being approved in 2 months, And then not making it to nvc.
The few i have found (approved in march and april) they have been in limbo for 3 or 4 months now. 
 

Recieved receipt # through text yesterday 7/17. We are also an IOE #
Waiting hard copy to know the service center.
I know some centers are moving faster with the normal process.
And I'm hearing that this IOE electronic processing is supposedly fast. 
But For processing times With the IOE # does it matter which service center we get?
 

I’d like an approval today USCIS 🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼

I had two dreams last night that I looked at the app and I was approved .. and then I woke up :-(

So it’s our anniversary tomorrow and my birthday on Wednesday, so this week would be an awesome week to get an approval.

So I checked the tracking status of my RFE reply and it has been delivered to USCIS. Woooooo

Hi! Yes, we received it on Friday and posted our evidence back straight away. We were fortunate to get a heads up about what we needed to provide. Due to arrive at USCIS on Monday.

Just to clear up a few misconceptions...
The various forms of the travel ban / restrictions have gone through numerous federal circuit courts and appellate courts. Some were liberal in nature, others not so much (more Republican-appointed judges than Democrat-appointed judges). I've actually listened to the oral arguments and read the briefs and decisions here. At no point has a single judge been able to stop the ban...by the time it has reached SCOTUS, it's gone through at least the initial judge as well as 2 other courts, usually with 3 judge panels. So at a minimum, at least 5 judges have ruled in favor of an injunction before SCOTUS addresses it at all. In most cases, a temporary injunction has been ordered either in full or in part. There's no such thing as judge-shopping. You file a case in a given jurisdiction, and whoever gets the case, gets it. There are some circuit courts perceived as more liberal than others, but even the ones with the most Democratically-appointed judges has a 65%/35% breakdown. The Hawaii district court has 1 less Republican-appointed judge than Democrat-appointed one (and will be split 50/50 once their 1 vacancy is filled by Trump...which he only nominated somebody in late Dec. 2017). SCOTUS has not heard the merits of the case. As such, they have not made a ruling on the legality of it. They only made a ruling about the temporary injunctions. Historically, SCOTUS defers immigration issues to the POTUS. SCOTUS will hear arguments on the actual case starting next month. As for the merits of the case, the issue isn't so much about any rights to visa applicants abroad. The issue is what is the extent of power that the POTUS can use to restrict a class of aliens, based on the 1952 law (INA 212(f)). The primary counterarguments are that 1) the POTUS extended the scope of the 1952 law, and 2) the 1965 amendment to the law prohibits discrimination based on (among other things) nationality.