Jump to content
Nature Boy 2.0

MUST SEE: THE VIDEO OF HILLARY CLINTON LYING THAT YOUTUBE TRIED TO BURY

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, laylalex said:

Wow, Infowars? I'm disappointed in you. :( That's not a reputable site at all. Even the NY Post is a better source.

Probably less inaccurate stories than the NYT

 

So what part of the story is false? 

Edited by Nature Boy 2.0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Probably less inaccurate stories than the NYT

 

So what part of the story is false? 

PLEASE. How ridiculous! Whatever anyone thinks about the NYT, Infowars is trash, and that video looks like a bunch of snippets put together to push a particular agenda. I'm not going to put my eyes on that junk for more than a minute, and I am almost always open to reading a variety of sources. I think there's much to be learned from legitimate sources wherever they are in terms of ideology. Inforwars isn't one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, laylalex said:

PLEASE. How ridiculous! Whatever anyone thinks about the NYT, Infowars is trash, and that video looks like a bunch of snippets put together to push a particular agenda. I'm not going to put my eyes on that junk for more than a minute, and I am almost always open to reading a variety of sources. I think there's much to be learned from legitimate sources wherever they are in terms of ideology. Inforwars isn't one of them.

So hillary did not lie, and the story is untrue ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, laylalex said:

PLEASE. How ridiculous! Whatever anyone thinks about the NYT, Infowars is trash, and that video looks like a bunch of snippets put together to push a particular agenda. I'm not going to put my eyes on that junk for more than a minute, and I am almost always open to reading a variety of sources. I think there's much to be learned from legitimate sources wherever they are in terms of ideology. Inforwars isn't one of them.

Answer his question. No need to deflect and calling the NYT a reputable site is making you look foolish. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, luckytxn said:

Answer his question. No need to deflect and calling the NYT a reputable site is making you look foolish. 

Actually, she said the NY Post.  And I agree with her, infowars IS trash, for the most part.

 

However, it doesn't take away from the accuracy of this particular concept in the OP.  That's why I posted but a few examples of Hillary lying that dont come from infowars, but are some of what they used in their compilation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Hillary Clinton lying" is the textbook example of a redundant phrase in English.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...