After being deported 3 times in 3 months, he came back with $400,000 of meth for sale

[Dashinka 25,885]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

you made the amnesty comment, not me. i don't know how to help you understand my posts, let me know if there's something i can do.

Just feedback.  I seem to get the same all the time, but whatever.

 

As I said in an earlier response, I am fine with your logic, let's enforce all the gun laws, and let's enforce all the immigration laws to their fullest.  Do you agree?

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Just feedback.  I seem to get the same all the time, but whatever.

 

As I said in an earlier response, I am fine with your logic, let's enforce all the gun laws, and let's enforce all the immigration laws to their fullest.  Do you agree?

as to my point, we already do.

[Boiler 47,496]

That amount of Meth would certainly have you Dreaming.

[smilesammich 10,727]

7 minutes ago, Boiler said:

That amount of Meth would certainly have you Dreaming.

dreaming? more like picking scabs off your face.

[Dashinka 25,885]

45 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

as to my point, we already do.

So we enforce all the immigration laws and gun laws to their fullest?  Where is your proof?  Millions of illegal immigrants currently living in the country, or the amount of crime committed by mentally challenged folks that should not have a gun?

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

So we enforce all the immigration laws and gun laws to their fullest?  Where is your proof?  Millions of illegal immigrants currently living in the country, or the amount of crime committed by mentally challenged folks that should not have a gun?

are people not being deported on a daily basis, and have been (even more so before trump)? are people not required to fulfill the laws of their state when purchasing a gun? the common nra argument is 'criminals will commit crimes/where there's a will there's a way' i just want to know why this logic isn't applied to a wall. a big expensive waste of money wall. when that money could be applied to improving border security, increasing cbp presence, and overhauling our legal immigration system to properly benefit those who go by the rules.

[Ban Hammer 14,286]

19 hours ago, smilesammich said:

it most certainly is a valid comparison. it would be invalid if there weren't already border control, and plenty of it. and clearly you misunderstand my comment concerning amnesty, but i'm sure that was intentional.

remind me again about which amendment allows one the right to enter illegally?

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

remind me again about which amendment allows one the right to enter illegally?

i'm not comparing amendments, real or imaginary. i'm comparing reactions. 

[TBoneTX 47,531]

2 hours ago, smilesammich said:

this logic isn't applied to a wall. a big expensive waste of money wall. when that money could be applied to improving border security, increasing cbp presence, and overhauling our legal immigration system

Agreed.  Wall in Texas has so many unsupportable negatives.

[TBoneTX 47,531]

These are just a few highlights:

https://bigbendgazette.com/2017/02/02/mayor-of-border-city-presidio-texas-calls-trumps-proposed-border-wall-short-sighted/

 

Of perhaps the utmost importance is the underpayment for, and arguably outright theft of, private property of Texans.  Most border land in Texas is privately owned, unlike that in the other 3 border states.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

23 hours ago, smilesammich said:

whenever there's a mass shooting and the mdl starts talking about ...'how many times does this have to happen before we up our gun control' the response from the right is 'enforce the existing gun control'. but when it comes to illegal immigrants and crime, the fact that we deport criminals and don't offer any sort of amnesty for criminals is completely ignored. the right can't entertain even a convo about strengthening gun control laws but we can flush 20 billion on a wall no questions asked..and never mind mexico paying for it. 

Why in the world should we offer amnesty to criminals?  What are you trying to say here?

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, IDWAF said:

Why in the world should we offer amnesty to criminals?  What are you trying to say here?

never said that, wasn't trying to say that. i suggest reading the post in its entirety instead of flipping out over the word amnesty. i mean, it's already been done in this very thread.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

8 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

It would be nice if you actually elucidated a point.

That is such a rare thing.  Mostly circular tail-chasing.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Just now, smilesammich said:

never said that, wasn't trying to say that. i suggest reading the post in its entirety instead of flipping out over the word amnesty. i mean, it's already been done in this very thread.

I’m just reading your post, and trying to understand your point.  Gun control laws exist.  Deporting criminals exist.  What is it that you would like to see happen differently?

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, IDWAF said:

I’m just reading your post, and trying to understand your point.  Gun control laws exist.  Deporting criminals exist.  What is it that you would like to see happen differently?

 

look, if you can't read what i wrote and the conversation that follows - i'm not going to hold your hand. where do you even get that question in context with my comments in this thread?