Jump to content
GringoD

Probe reveals feds pressuring agents to rush immigrant visas

 Share

15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

"Higher-ups within U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are pressuring rank-and-file officers to rubber-stamp immigrants’ visa applications, sometimes against the officers’ will, according to a Homeland Security report and internal documents exclusively obtained by The Daily."

For the rest of the story, go here:

http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/01/03/010312-news-immigration-strife-1-3/?test=latestnews

07/27/2011...........NOA1 received.

12/05/2011...........RFE received.

12/13/2011...........RFE response sent.

12/16/2011...........RFE RESPONSE received by Vermont S.C.

12/22/2011...........Teased by a text-message from uscis, saying they have received my response to the RFE.

12/30/2011...........LA VISA APROVADOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!

01/12/2012...........Case Sent To Bogota Colombia, from the National Visa Center.

02/09/2012...........Schedule Interview.

03/23/2012...........Interview (to take place then)!

04/07/2012...........Arrived in USA.

07/01/2012...........MARRIED!

What next?

.......How the days DO slip away!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

wow.. what a horribly written article that basically says nothing.. The "probe" is only covering USCIS which is more about documentation than anything else - they make very little "gut" decisions..

The first half of the article talks about how there is pressure to say "yes" that has gotten worse during the Obama administration.. Then it gives these two paragraphs:

Nevertheless, USCIS approved 86 percent of the 3.9 million immigration cases it reviewed between October 2008 and October 2009 — a 4 percent drop from the year before, according to the most recent data provided to The Daily.

And immigration attorneys complained that it seems like officers are just looking for reasons to deny a case, and already demand a higher standard of proof than what is required. That standard is now considered a 51 percent likelihood that a fact is true.

So... They approve 86 PERCENT which is 4% drop.. This does not sound like stepped up pressure to say "yes" like the first half of the article says and it does not sound like they are just looking to say "no" like the lawyers are claiming.

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

Hey fellow VJ'ers - thought you might be interested in this article out today about feds rushing immigration petitions.

Here's the link: http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/01/03/010312-news-immigration-strife-1-3/

Happy Reading!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Hey fellow VJ'ers - thought you might be interested in this article out today about feds rushing immigration petitions.

Here's the link: http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/01/03/010312-news-immigration-strife-1-3/

Happy Reading!

The author of the article doesn't seem to know the difference between a visa application and a petition.

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
The author of the article doesn't seem to know the difference between a visa application and a petition.
Si, man -- and, only toward the bottom of the article is the visa TYPE indicated (or suggested).

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline

The author of the article doesn't seem to know the difference between a visa application and a petition.

I wouldn't even try to educate the hack on the proper terms to use..... that would be called researching the article before publishing that piece of scata, and might result in some accuracy in the otherwise vapid piece.

Completed: K1/K2 (271 days) - AOS/EAD/AP (134 days) - ROC (279 days)

"Si vis amari, ama" - Seneca

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

I read that article but I don't remember it giving an indication as to what types of Visa's.

Work Visas like H1B Visas can be highly political with large lobbying forces. Does this article apply to family based Visas at all ? Something to question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Kazakhstan
Timeline

I would not really trust this site. It is not official I even did not find button about us. May be I missed it?

dd/mm/yyyy K-1

01/03/2012 === I-129F sent via USPS

01/05/2012 === I-129F delivered to USCIS (PO BOX)

01/06/2012 === I-129F officially received by USCIS (Information from hard copy of NOA1)

01/09/2012 === I-129F official notice day (Information from hard copy of NOA1)

01/10/2012 === NOA1 received by Email. Case routed to California Service Center

01/13/2012 === I-129F official hard copy received from USCIS

03/29/2012 === I-129F touched.

06/11/2012 === I-129F Approved (157 days)

06/12/2012 === NOA2 received by Email.

06/12/2012 === I-129F touched.

07/02/2012 === I-129F touched. (I hope it is gong to NVC ;) ) (NOA2 approved for 2nd time)

07/06/2012 === 2nd NOA2 official hard copy received from USCIS. ( I am furious about getting my application approved for 2nd time. I wonder why they did it? )

07/05/2012 === NVC received

07/10/2012 === NVC left

07/16/2012 === Consulate received (via DHL tracking)

08/21/2012 === Inteview (Approved)

11/04/2012 === POE at Detroit

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

duplicate topics merged

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Colombia
Timeline

Good Lord!!!! Maybe they should approve all people with VJ accounts then make the "process better". LOL!!! or jajajaja. Its truly amazing how much effort they put into slowing down the folks who take a #, say "we are here and we are waiting so please dont forget us because many of us are separated from people we love ever so dearly". Lets look at the other side of immigration that is working fast...wet foot, dry foot, and catch and relaese. Hmmmmmmmm...maybe my wife should have jumped a fence or paddled a raft...she may have been here by now. Oh well...you all know the drill. We hurry up and wait. :bonk:

FYI: Dont remember who, but it was a vj member with a COL esposa who I believe contacted their representative who confirmed the 5 month wait but the wonderful government 5 month is actually >6 months so 5 months and 29 days is still "5" months. Hey...just putting it out there. :dance:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish one of those rubber stamp approvers would get my case, its been 2 and half years.....

07-24-2009 Received NOA1
08-05-2009 Touched
10-02-2009 I-797C for Biometrics Appt
10-26-2009 Biometrics Appt. Completed
05-11-2010 Request for Evidence on both the I129F and I130
07-01-2010 Case Transferred to Vermont Service Center
10-20-2011 Contacted Ombudsman
02-07-2012 Case denied after almost 3 years =(
03-07-2012 Appeal Filed!
01-20-2013 Contacted Ombudsman again...

06-25-2013 EOIR Appeal Review

Visit my blog at http://goo.gl/ON4wG/

atckcgod5n.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...