Jump to content

173 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted

Why do they still bother having murder laws on the books? In my view, if they charge any parent with murder for killing their own child now, after birth or not, they are nothing but hypocrites.

09/14/2012: Sent I-130
10/04/2012: NOA1 Received
12/11/2012: NOA2 Received
12/18/2012: NVC Received Case
01/08/2013: Received Case Number/IIN; DS-3032/I-864 Bill
01/08/2013: DS-3032 Sent
01/18/2013: DS-3032 Accepted; Received IV Bill
01/23/2013: Paid I-864 Bill; Paid IV Bill
02/05/2013: IV Package Sent
02/18/2013: AOS Package Sent
03/22/2013: Case complete
05/06/2013: Interview Scheduled

06/05/2013: Visa issued!

06/28/2013: VISA RECEIVED

07/09/2013: POE - EWR. Went super fast and easy. 5 minutes of waiting and then just a signature and finger print.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05/06/2016: One month late - overnighted form N-400.

06/01/2016: Original Biometrics appointment, had to reschedule due to being away.

07/01/2016: Biometrics Completed.

08/17/2016: Interview scheduled & approved.

09/16/2016: Scheduled oath ceremony.

09/16/2016: THE END - 4 year long process all done!

 

 

Filed: Timeline
Posted
12 hours ago, OriZ said:

Why do they still bother having murder laws on the books? In my view, if they charge any parent with murder for killing their own child now, after birth or not, they are nothing but hypocrites.

I actually hate to say this, but maybe a year ago I had this very argument with Val.  If we keep increasing the allowable abortion times, what's to stop a frustrated mother from killing an unruly infant?  And when do teens become fair game?

Posted
7 hours ago, ALFKAD said:

I actually hate to say this, but maybe a year ago I had this very argument with Val.  If we keep increasing the allowable abortion times, what's to stop a frustrated mother from killing an unruly infant?  And when do teens become fair game?

 

  The NY law uses 24 weeks as the cutoff, unless the fetus is already non viable or the mothers health is at risk. This is the same wording used in Roe vs Wade. I'm not sure what you think has increased.  The old NY law allowed abortion after 24 weeks if the mothers life was at risk. The new law allows abortion after 24 weeks if the fetus is non viable or if the mothers health is at serious risk. 

 

  A woman cannot just decide to have an abortion at 25 weeks. You guys seem to be imagining what the law allows or you are listening to the rhetoric a little to closely. New York's penal code already classifies conduct which causes death of an unborn child greater than 24 weeks as homicide. Deciding you don't want a baby at 25 weeks gestation is not an exception to that law.

 

 

 

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Posted
56 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  The NY law uses 24 weeks as the cutoff, unless the fetus is already non viable or the mothers health is at risk. This is the same wording used in Roe vs Wade. I'm not sure what you think has increased.  The old NY law allowed abortion after 24 weeks if the mothers life was at risk. The new law allows abortion after 24 weeks if the fetus is non viable or if the mothers health is at serious risk. 

 

  A woman cannot just decide to have an abortion at 25 weeks. You guys seem to be imagining what the law allows or you are listening to the rhetoric a little to closely. New York's penal code already classifies conduct which causes death of an unborn child greater than 24 weeks as homicide. Deciding you don't want a baby at 25 weeks gestation is not an exception to that law.

 

 

 

A good many of my FB friends are from my rual childhood.  A good many fundamental white 45+ types. OMG the misinformational outrage is overwhelming my feed.

 

Yes I know I made a new word and slogan but it fits.

 

Misinformational Outrage 

Posted
1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

A good many of my FB friends are from my rual childhood.  A good many fundamental white 45+ types. OMG the misinformational outrage is overwhelming my feed.

 

Yes I know I made a new word and slogan but it fits.

 

Misinformational Outrage 

 

  Not bad. Given your track record, it will probably stick. You'll probably help it along too. I agree though, always a good idea to get the facts first before you decide if you need to get mad or not. There is a lot of reaction here to a reality that hasn't changed all that much.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Filed: Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  The NY law uses 24 weeks as the cutoff, unless the fetus is already non viable or the mothers health is at risk. This is the same wording used in Roe vs Wade. I'm not sure what you think has increased.  The old NY law allowed abortion after 24 weeks if the mothers life was at risk. The new law allows abortion after 24 weeks if the fetus is non viable or if the mothers health is at serious risk. 

 

  A woman cannot just decide to have an abortion at 25 weeks. You guys seem to be imagining what the law allows or you are listening to the rhetoric a little to closely. New York's penal code already classifies conduct which causes death of an unborn child greater than 24 weeks as homicide. Deciding you don't want a baby at 25 weeks gestation is not an exception to that law.

 

 

 

Quote

In other words, abortion will be available to women essentially on demand up to the point of birth. The RHA will also decriminalize abortion, moving it from the state’s criminal code to the public-health code.

 

Filed: Timeline
Posted
33 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Not bad. Given your track record, it will probably stick. You'll probably help it along too. I agree though, always a good idea to get the facts first before you decide if you need to get mad or not. There is a lot of reaction here to a reality that hasn't changed all that much.

Apropos of nothing, your siggy pic has been a bad link for some time now.  All I see is text.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
16 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  You are quoting rhetoric from a biased website. Look at the actual law.

No, I am quoting from the OP.  Who here would post drivel from a biased website?

 

Ok, so now it is legal for a woman to abort a fetus 60% of the way into her pregnancy and it not be called homicide.  Plus or minus about 2-4 weeks, of course.  

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Some legality for your pleasurable reading:

 

 

 

Quote

S 125.05 Homicide, abortion and related offenses; definitions of terms.
  The following definitions are applicable to this article:
  1. "Person," when referring to the victim of a homicide, means a human
being who has been born and is alive.
  2. "Abortional act" means an act committed upon or with respect to a
female, whether by another person or by the female herself, whether she
is pregnant or not, whether directly upon her body or by the
administering, taking or prescription of drugs or in any other manner,
with intent to cause a miscarriage of such female.
  3. "Justifiable abortional act." An abortional act is justifiable when
committed upon a female with her consent by a duly licensed physician
acting (a) under a reasonable belief that such is necessary to preserve
her life, or, (b) within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of her
pregnancy. A pregnant female`s commission of an abortional act upon
herself is justifiable when she acts upon the advice of a duly licensed
physician (1) that such act is necessary to preserve her life, or, (2)
within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of her pregnancy. The
submission by a female to an abortional act is justifiable when she
believes that it is being committed by a duly licensed physician, acting
under a reasonable belief that such act is necessary to preserve her
life, or, within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of her
pregnancy.

So an abortional act can be performed on a woman who is pregnant or not.  Hmmmm.

 

Paragraph 3. Says it’s justifiable for a woman to abort herself if her physician tells her it will preserve her life.  Not save her life, but preserve it.  Seems like a potentially broad definition that can be abused if a person so desires. Preserving her life could be construed to mean keeping the status quo, as opposed to all the life changes brought about by the birth of an unwanted rug rat.  But perhaps that’s just me.

 

http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article125.htm#p125.05

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted

20 weeks should be absolute max. If you ask my wife it should be 12...

09/14/2012: Sent I-130
10/04/2012: NOA1 Received
12/11/2012: NOA2 Received
12/18/2012: NVC Received Case
01/08/2013: Received Case Number/IIN; DS-3032/I-864 Bill
01/08/2013: DS-3032 Sent
01/18/2013: DS-3032 Accepted; Received IV Bill
01/23/2013: Paid I-864 Bill; Paid IV Bill
02/05/2013: IV Package Sent
02/18/2013: AOS Package Sent
03/22/2013: Case complete
05/06/2013: Interview Scheduled

06/05/2013: Visa issued!

06/28/2013: VISA RECEIVED

07/09/2013: POE - EWR. Went super fast and easy. 5 minutes of waiting and then just a signature and finger print.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05/06/2016: One month late - overnighted form N-400.

06/01/2016: Original Biometrics appointment, had to reschedule due to being away.

07/01/2016: Biometrics Completed.

08/17/2016: Interview scheduled & approved.

09/16/2016: Scheduled oath ceremony.

09/16/2016: THE END - 4 year long process all done!

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...