WATCH: Trump Trolls Democratic Leaders Over Illegal Immigration In Epic Video

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

 

[jg121783 3,907]

1 hour ago, JimandChristy said:

Strong, now that's funny. Why do some conservatives always associate people who are being a bully as being strong? Just because you're a bully doesn't mean you're strong. It's not the 1970s or 1980s anymore, you got to earn the respect not bully people into submission.

 

Respect is a two way street and some people just can't be reasoned with.

 

1 hour ago, Póg mo said:

I love conservative logic. One moment they are calling Hillary a crook, the next they are saying that they don't care Trump is a crook, because it's not harming them personally. What wonderful citizens they are.

You care to elaborate on what makes Trump a crook? I'm assuming you are talking about criminal or impeachable offenses. If that is the case please tell me the specific offenses and any evidence that backs up the allegations. I have been asking this question for the past few days and no one seems to have an answer. Maybe you can shed some light on the subject.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

29 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Respect is a two way street and some people just can't be reasoned with.

 

You care to elaborate on what makes Trump a crook? I'm assuming you are talking about criminal or impeachable offenses. If that is the case please tell me the specific offenses and any evidence that backs up the allegations. I have been asking this question for the past few days and no one seems to have an answer. Maybe you can shed some light on the subject.

 

  What he said was Trump supporters don't care if Trump is a crook or not. They are too distracted with the possibility of Hillary being a crook. All the evidence or lack of evidence in the world wouldn't matter in either case. Preconceived opinion has already won out.

[Póg mo 1,749]

43 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  What he said was Trump supporters don't care if Trump is a crook or not. They are too distracted with the possibility of Hillary being a crook. All the evidence or lack of evidence in the world wouldn't matter in either case. Preconceived opinion has already won out.

Yup, they don't care. Partisanship over country, every time with those folks.

[jg121783 3,907]

1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  What he said was Trump supporters don't care if Trump is a crook or not. They are too distracted with the possibility of Hillary being a crook. All the evidence or lack of evidence in the world wouldn't matter in either case. Preconceived opinion has already won out.

 

1 hour ago, Póg mo said:

Yup, they don't care. Partisanship over country, every time with those folks.

In other words you guys can't point out a specific crime with evidence to back it up. Seems like you are the ones who don't care about evidence because I keep asking for it and you guys keep sidestepping the question.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

13 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

 

In other words you guys can't point out a specific crime with evidence to back it up. Seems like you are the ones who don't care about evidence because I keep asking for it and you guys keep sidestepping the question.

 

  Why are you asking for evidence of a crime on an internet forum?   There is an actual investigation going on. Pretty sure no one here is privy to that. Honestly, if I had inside information I wouldn't tell you anyway. It's more interesting watching you post the same thing over and over and over.

[Chris Duffy 1,256]

5 hours ago, JimandChristy said:

Strong, now that's funny. Why do some conservatives always associate people who are being a bully as being strong? Just because you're a bully doesn't mean you're strong. It's not the 1970s or 1980s anymore, you got to earn the respect not bully people into submission.

 

I grew up in a different time from you. We as Americans were strong, we were not "politically correct". My brother was drafted to Vietnam, my uncles and fathers and grandfathers fought in WW2 and Korea. 

 

Just a different style to live, If you ever study the US past and you will understand why we call my previous generation the guys/gals who won WW2 the "Greatest Generation'

 

Now of day the USA is soft and has raised a "Soft' generation, God help us in the future, but I am confident we still have the power and resolve to still be a dominate force in the world.  We are still the Super Power of the world

 

 

[Póg mo 1,749]

38 minutes ago, Chris Duffy said:

I grew up in a different time from you. We as Americans were strong, we were not "politically correct". My brother was drafted to Vietnam, my uncles and fathers and grandfathers fought in WW2 and Korea. 

 

Just a different style to live, If you ever study the US past and you will understand why we call my previous generation the guys/gals who won WW2 the "Greatest Generation'

 

Now of day the USA is soft and has raised a "Soft' generation, God help us in the future, but I am confident we still have the power and resolve to still be a dominate force in the world.  We are still the Super Power of the world

 

 

Kool story bro, however I remember my dear departed dad give the same speech over thirty years ago, and I bet his father said the same thing. 

[jg121783 3,907]

6 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Why are you asking for evidence of a crime on an internet forum?   There is an actual investigation going on. Pretty sure no one here is privy to that. Honestly, if I had inside information I wouldn't tell you anyway. It's more interesting watching you post the same thing over and over and over.

Then why the continuous assertion that Trump is a criminal and his impeachment is imminent? An investigation doesn't automatically mean someone is guilty of something. If it did that makes Hillary a crimimal because she was under investigation also. Oh wait. That was a "matter" not an investigation.

 

I'm asking a simple question here. If you believe Trump committed a crime what is the crime he allegedly committed? No one even wants to attempt to answer that. All I'm saying is tell us what crime he committed or stop accusing him of being a criminal. Simple concept.

[Póg mo 1,749]

6 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Then why the continuous assertion that Trump is a criminal and his impeachment is imminent? An investigation doesn't automatically mean someone is guilty of something. If it did that makes Hillary a crimimal because she was under investigation also. Oh wait. That was a "matter" not an investigation.

 

I'm asking a simple question here. If you believe Trump committed a crime what is the crime he allegedly committed? No one even wants to attempt to answer that. All I'm saying is tell us what crime he committed or stop accusing him of being a criminal. Simple concept.

I believe someone once said that if someone is under investigation by the FBI, then that person should not be president. 

[JimandChristy 1,689]

17 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

I believe someone once said that if someone is under investigation by the FBI, then that person should not be president. 

Or if anyone takes the fifth is the mob. *cough* Roger Stone 

[Dashinka 23,252]

18 hours ago, JimandChristy said:

 

Schooled? Schooled?! That is hilarious! Mango was the one who came out of that meeting embarrassed and looking like a complete idiot. He lost his cool and proclaimed I'll be glad to shutdown the government. It's not going to work, he ran on illegal immigration in the midterms and he got his backside handed to him. I bet you thought Pence made a convincing argument!

He lost his cool?  I guess you really didn’t look at how uneasy Chuck and Nancy were when the cameras were rolling.  Heck Nancy asked four times to get rid of the press, and Chuck at least once.  I guess Chuck and Nancy only want transparency in government on their own terms.

[Dashinka 23,252]

18 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  It looked like he tried to talk over them and that's all it looked like. Not that it matters really. His supporters will always say he won, his detractors will always say he's an idiot, and most of the rest of us don't really care. I'm not sure if he jumped the sharked yet, or if that is still to come, but either way, it's not really worth watching.

I don’t think he won or lost, but I do think he is much more at ease with being transparent in front of the media and debating any subject then Chuck and Nancy are.  I for one am happy he kept the media there, but Chuck and Nancy obviously were not.

[Dashinka 23,252]

15 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  What he said was Trump supporters don't care if Trump is a crook or not. They are too distracted with the possibility of Hillary being a crook. All the evidence or lack of evidence in the world wouldn't matter in either case. Preconceived opinion has already won out.

Actually, I do care that he is a crook, and if there is any evidence of such, then he should be prosecuted sitting president or not.  The issue is that there is no evidence of anything at this point.  Sure he may have paid off a couple of women, but campaign finance laws are usually only prosecuted with a fine if at all.  The other thing that worries me is the complete double standard in our DOJ with respect to who they pursue.  We have one campaign that clearly violated the laws relative to using a foreign agent to provide material support for their campaign (that material actually used to kick start the Trump investigation) and it is given a wink and a nod.  A candidate clearly mishandles classified information, a crime that has put many lesser folks in prison, and it is given a wink and a nod.  I have been told I should not worry about this as the outside influences are much more worrying, but to me, one have to get their own house in order before worrying about anyone else’s house.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Prostitution = misdemeanor = a fine.  No high crime there.  Whether he paid $100 or $100,000 matters not.  Hopefully, it was worth it.