Gore claims climate battle just like fight against slavery, apartheid

[Boiler 48,111]

Dinosaur Farts?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

9 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

You keep repeating that but you didn't answer my earlier question. If the Sun doesn't drive climate change and it is humans that drive climate change what was responsible for climate change before the industrial revolution or for that matter before humans existed? Maybe it was all the cow farts.

And that is the 64 million dollar question. If it's the hottest it's been since medevil times, what caused it back then. 

[eieio 1,594]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

And that is the 64 million dollar question. If it's the hottest it's been since medevil times, what caused it back then. 

Who cares….we have carbon credits to sell.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

3 hours ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

The sun has no effect on the climate.  Wow you nailed it bro 

The sun provides the earth with energy, the sun theory being floated doesn't have a scientific leg to stand on though. The theory was floated, scientifically examined, and debunked. Google is your friend, as I said before try reading links to actual science websites.

[IAMX 3,055]

1 hour ago, eieio said:

Who cares….we have carbon credits to sell.

Yes! 

 

Not only do the left peddle odd theories and call it science, but they also peddle doomsday climate scenarios.. humans are at fault for the entire Earth's climate system changing, and we'd all be saved from this if we'd only adopt leftist economic and environmental policies. Who knew the vastly complex systems of climate boiled down to such simple political policies?

 

Who else was born yesterday?

[Dashinka 26,210]

5 hours ago, IAMX said:

Yes! 

 

Not only do the left peddle odd theories and call it science, but they also peddle doomsday climate scenarios.. humans are at fault for the entire Earth's climate system changing, and we'd all be saved from this if we'd only adopt leftist economic and environmental policies. Who knew the vastly complex systems of climate boiled down to such simple political policies?

 

Who else was born yesterday?

There was or is a UN official that once said we need to completely eliminate all CO2 emissions (I apologize as I don't remember his name).  I wonder if he realized the idiocy of his words after he said them considering all animal life on earth emits CO2.  Will he be first in line to stop his emissions?

 

Here is another scientific paper that debunks the effects of CO2 and points out one of the major assumptions in most of the current flawed model.  In short, treating CO2 as a black body is a poor thermodynamic assumption.

 

http://notrickszone.com/2017/07/17/swiss-physicist-concludes-ipcc-assumptions-violate-reality-co2-a-very-weak-greenhouse-gas/#sthash.4S4Pasmd.mq73NYP1.dpbs

[jg121783 3,921]

10 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

There was or is a UN official that once said we need to completely eliminate all CO2 emissions (I apologize as I don't remember his name).  I wonder if he realized the idiocy of his words after he said them considering all animal life on earth emits CO2.  Will he be first in line to stop his emissions?

 

Here is another scientific paper that debunks the effects of CO2 and points out one of the major assumptions in most of the current flawed model.  In short, treating CO2 as a black body is a poor thermodynamic assumption.

 

http://notrickszone.com/2017/07/17/swiss-physicist-concludes-ipcc-assumptions-violate-reality-co2-a-very-weak-greenhouse-gas/#sthash.4S4Pasmd.mq73NYP1.dpbs

Thats just science. Not liberal sun denier science. It's fake.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

14 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

There was or is a UN official that once said we need to completely eliminate all CO2 emissions (I apologize as I don't remember his name).  I wonder if he realized the idiocy of his words after he said them considering all animal life on earth emits CO2.  Will he be first in line to stop his emissions?

 

Here is another scientific paper that debunks the effects of CO2 and points out one of the major assumptions in most of the current flawed model.  In short, treating CO2 as a black body is a poor thermodynamic assumption.

 

http://notrickszone.com/2017/07/17/swiss-physicist-concludes-ipcc-assumptions-violate-reality-co2-a-very-weak-greenhouse-gas/#sthash.4S4Pasmd.mq73NYP1.dpbs

When you get your scientific information from notrickszone.com that pretty much says it all in regards to the quality of the information you are willing to receive.

[Dashinka 26,210]

10 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

When you get your scientific information from notrickszone.com that pretty much says it all in regards to the quality of the information you are willing to receive.

The news source did not write the paper that points out the poor assumptions, but whatever floats your boat.

 

 

 

[ready4ONE 5,400]

4 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

The news source did not write the paper that points out the poor assumptions, but whatever floats your boat.

 

 

 

So go directly to a scientific source. Why not? Because you can't find one that supports your position.

[jg121783 3,921]

3 hours ago, ready4ONE said:

So go directly to a scientific source. Why not? Because you can't find one that supports your position.

There is a scientific source in the article with an external link if you had bothered to look.

[Dashinka 26,210]

15 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

There is a scientific source in the article with an external link if you had bothered to look.

Too hard to see with predisposed positions.

[IAMX 3,055]

11 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Too hard to see with predisposed positions.

Breitba-- 

 

[Ban Hammer 14,619]

[IAMX 3,055]

7 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

Guy was the laughing stock of Alberta when he came.