Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
X Factor

Judge Sets Bail at $150,000 for Shooter in Trayvon Martin Case

153 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline

Judge Sets Bail at $150,000 for Shooter in Trayvon Martin Case

Judge Kenneth R. Lester Jr. of Seminole County Circuit Court set bail at $150,000 for George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer who was arrested last week in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin. The judge also set conditions, including a curfew, on his release. Mr. Zimmerman will not be released from jail on Friday. The judge said that he wanted to make sure security measures were in place for Mr. Zimmerman, who has received death threats.

Read more here


Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

A bit steep of a price (as always) for bail.

Of course the 8th amendment gets violated every day of the week, but no one really seems to care.


nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Even if security measures ARE taken when GZ is released, he's probably an eventual dead man, what with that bounty on him, sigh man.


06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline
Even if security measures ARE taken when GZ is released, he's probably an eventual dead man, what with that bounty on him, sigh man.

I don't think that "bounty" is the issue. I could imagine, however, that someone might have reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm if they ran into Z and decide to rather stand their ground. Cuts both ways, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline

I don't think that "bounty" is the issue. I could imagine, however, that someone might have reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm if they ran into Z and decide to rather stand their ground. Cuts both ways, no?

I don't think Z will be standing his ground for a very long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
someone might have reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm if they ran into Z and decide to rather stand their ground.
If he's released on bond, he'll probably be prohibited from being armed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline
If he's released on bond, he'll probably be prohibited from being armed.

Last I heard, the kid he killed wasn't armed either and he still claims he killed the kid because he was afraid for his life. Why can't someone be afraid for his life when encountering a presumably unarmed Z? As I said, it cuts both ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The States case is getting hammered pretty hard in the media.

“They have got a tenuous case that looks all the more tenuous,” Orlando attorney Mark NeJame said in his role as a CNN analyst.

NeJame cited two key factors in lambasting the state: “They have now said under oath, under oath by their lead investigator, that they don’t know who started the fight. And they don’t know if he [Zimmerman] was going back to the car or not. Two essential elements to make a case and they … are locked in forevermore that they have no evidence to establish it. Amazing they were so unprepared."

Attorney Diana Tennis, an analyst for WOFL-Channel 35, cited the biggest shock to her: “When the state of Florida says ‘I don’t have any witnesses, we’re only going on the probable cause affidavit,’ that is code for ‘judge, we don’t have the evidence we need, we know he’s going to get a bond.’ They should have just said that out loud.

Attorney Bill Sheaffer, returning as legal analyst for WFTV-Channel 9, sized up the defense’s approach. “The defense came out swinging, and we saw a harbinger of what we’re going to see at trial,” Sheaffer said. “That is raising reasonable doubt, poking holes in the state’s case. One of the key things that came out today was this: There is no evidence to refute Zimmerman’s claim that Trayvon Martin was the aggressor

And Dershowitz piles on again: Dershowitz Blasts Zimmerman Prosecution: 'Not Only Immoral, But Stupid'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

Last I heard, the kid he killed wasn't armed either and he still claims he killed the kid because he was afraid for his life. Why can't someone be afraid for his life when encountering a presumably unarmed Z? As I said, it cuts both ways.

Because even a light weight can beat the ####### out of him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Isle of Man
Timeline

Even if security measures ARE taken when GZ is released, he's probably an eventual dead man, what with that bounty on him, sigh man.

Just like Casey Anthony? After 2 weeks nobody will remember who GZ is.

More likely within a few days he'll give an interview for $500,000.

Because even a light weight can beat the ####### out of him.

"Beat the ####### out of him"

rofl.gif

A good punch would have knocked GZ unconscious. And if GZ got the ####### beaten out of him he would have been too paralyzed to grab his weapon and fire to kill.

What GZ got was a boo-boo.


India, gun buyback and steamroll.

qVVjt.jpg?3qVHRo.jpg?1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...