Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fandango

Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard

  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. What is this about?

    • Right to Privacy
      7
    • Right to Free Speech
      17


159 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Really needed the third option of "argument between two chop####s"


2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline

If the billboard did not mention the woman's name, and there's no picture of her...what do you think?

Invasion of privacy, or right to free speech?

I don't see how it's an invasion of privacy of there is no name or picture of the woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Depends on the size of the town. If Tony were to make a billboard and have HIS face there saying what this billboard did (except wife not gf) lots of people who know us would know who his wife is. I think this girls thing is the same. While not everyone would know who she is enough people would know who she is and it could destroy a lot of things. Think about everyone who would know them together. For me and Tony it would be his friends, my friends, our family, his work colleagues, my work colleagues, his families friends (thanks to FB etc) and it would expand as people see the billboard and talk about who that person is.

My issue is he could just gossip about her and he wouldn't be sued in the same way UNLESS it's a lie. If he believed it to be the truth then there's nothing wrong with it but I do think he's a classless person and it speaks more about him than her. If it's a lie well he should get into a lot of ###### for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right to privacy is covered under which part of the constitution?


Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

The girl says she had never discussed the pregnancy issue with him and then girl’s friend says it was miscarriage and not an abortion.

They were not married so don’t know how the guy is feeling he is left out of his fatherhood…..

This case is just crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline

... can you please point out the part that says people have a right to privacy?

I realize you conservafreaks rely on the fact that the actual words "right to privacy" aren't in the Constitution. But if you are at all interested in how us libtards see the issue, feel free to read this page and learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely.

Once again, my comprehension seems to be lacking... can you please point out the part that says people have a right to privacy?

Which ones?

And if none cover this billboard issue, what do they cover?

What I'm wondering is if this woman wanted privacy, why did she come forward and reveal herself to the entire world? Couldn't she have denied she was the woman he was alluding to? And what kind of private person would publicly dmit they had sexual relations with that dude?

I have reproduced slim's last post here, and removed some baiting and posts quoting same. If it continues, thread bans and other admin action will follow.


3dflags_ukr0001-0001a.gif3dflags_usa0001-0001a.gif

Travelers - not tourists

Friday.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

I realize you conservafreaks rely on the fact that the actual words "right to privacy" aren't in the Constitution. But if you are at all interested in how us libtards see the issue, feel free to read this page and learn.

It's the same line of thinking that some believe the Constitution doesn't give women equals rights as men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline

It's the same line of thinking that some believe the Constitution doesn't give women equals rights as men.

The conservafreak line of thinking is easy to understand. Simple minds, and all that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you are at all interested in how us libtards see the issue

I'm not. The constitution is a very simple document that even common folks can understand. If you disagree with it, that's not the same thing as "seeing it from a different side" it simply means you disagree.

The reason you folks are libtards is because you think just because you disagree with something you can claim it means something other than what it says. That's pretty libtarded.

It's the same line of thinking that some believe the Constitution doesn't give women equals rights as men.

It didn't. But, that was fixored.

If you (or anyone) doesn't agree with a certain part of the constitution, get it fixored again. People often point to the fact that the original constitution didn't recognize women and people other than white men as being whole. Well, that's been fixed. Why didn't they fix the other stuff that was wrong while they were at it?

The conservafreak line of thinking is easy to understand. Simple minds, and all that.

Exactly.

I don't understand why government has to be complex. Seems to me when it starts getting complex you don't ensure someone's rights, you ensure someone has a legal right to do wrong.


Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline

The constitution is a very simple document that even common folks can understand. If you disagree with it ...

Had you read the link, you'd know it's not a matter of lay libtards simply disagreeing with it. But since you didn't read it and don't intend to, I suppose this conversation ends here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

It didn't. But, that was fixored.

If you (or anyone) doesn't agree with a certain part of the constitution, get it fixored again. People often point to the fact that the original constitution didn't recognize women and people other than white men as being whole. Well, that's been fixed. Why didn't they fix the other stuff that was wrong while they were at it?

Oh, ok. If you want to be literal, then the 2nd Amendment doesn't contain the words, 'handgun,' nor does it make any distinction as to what is and isn't an 'arm'. Where in the 2nd Amendment does it say an 'arm' is a handgun, but not a tank, or a rifle, but not vile of anthrax?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...