IR-1/CR-1 Spouse Visa Timelines

Pages: First 2567 2568 2569 2570 2571 Last (Showing page 2569, records 25681 - 25690 out of 37491 )

Notes: Some columns are currently hidden. [Filters: Service Center = All, Country = All] [SORT : Date I-130 NOA - DESC]

· enable advanced mode

Names	Country	Service Center	Xfer?	Consulate	I-130 Sent	I-130 NOA1	I-130 NOA2	NVC Received	NVC Left	Consulate Received	Packet 3 Received	Packet 3 Sent	Packet 4 Received	Interview	Visa Received	US Entry	Marriage	Total Days File ➙ Int.	Comments. List anything unique to your case.	Updated Last
d & k	Italy	Texas	No	Naples, Italy	2011-06-21	2011-06-27	2011-06-30			2011-07-12	2011-07-12	2011-07-19	2011-07-19	2011-08-23	2011-08-23	2011-09-27	2011-05-26	63*	New York JFK POE. Relatively efficient process although the immigration officers clearly appeared worn down by all of the non-English speaking new immigrants. They were curt and grumpy, but got us through as quickly as possible. Time spent in immigration at airport: 1 hr.	2011-10-02
husband & wife	Pakistan	California	No	Islamabad, Pakistan	2011-06-21	2011-06-26	2011-11-26	2011-12-29					2012-05-04	2012-06-21			2010-09-28	366	The interviewer was mean and unpleasant. She refused to look at our proof of relationship and only asked 4 questions. She gave him a denial that you can read below stating that our answers don't match and that it is not a bonifide relationship. The CO NEVER EVEN CALLED ME!!!! We have been together for 3 years and married almost 2 years. How can they do this. He asked her if we have any recourse and she said yes, let her move to Pakistan. Section 212(a)(5) A The interviewing consular officer has determined that the petition is based on a fraudulent relationship entered into for immigration purposes only. During an extended fraud interview, where the petitioner and applicant were interviewed separately and the answers were compared, the couple had numerous discrepancies and exhibited a lack of basic knowledge about each other. The consular officer is certain the relationship is for immigration purposes only, and there is no petitionable relationship. Therefore, the petition is invalid under INA section INA 212 (A)(5)(A)> Case sent back to USCIS 26JUN13 (1 year) Received email that NOIR will be send within 14 days 10SEP13	2013-09-11
JONIR & LYN	Haiti	California	No	Haiti	2011-06-21	2011-06-24	2011-07-14	2011-08-01	2012-01-31				2012-02-02	2012-03-02	2012-03-13	2012-03-22	2010-12-23	255*		2012-03-23
rp & kc	India	California	No	Mumbai, India	2011-06-20	2011-06-24											2011-05-29	N/A		2011-08-20
Adrian & Adrianna	Jamaica	California	No	Jamaica	2011-06-21	2011-06-24	2011-09-13	2011-09-17									2011-05-15	N/A		2011-11-09
brenda & marco	Mexico	California	No	Juarez, Mexico	2011-06-16	2011-06-24	2011-11-22						2012-02-17	2012-03-21			2010-09-17	279		2012-03-21
N & P	Thailand	California	No	Bangkok, Thailand	2011-06-22	2011-06-24	2011-11-21	2011-12-29						2012-03-21	2012-03-28	2012-06-02	2010-09-09	273*	:)	2012-09-01
Su & Marvin	Malaysia	California	No	Malaysia	2011-06-17	2011-06-24	2011-07-26	2011-08-12	2011-08-29	2011-09-02	2011-09-06	2011-09-06	2011-09-12	2011-09-22	2011-10-18	2011-10-22	2011-06-04	97*		2013-10-30
J & W	China	National/MSC	No	Guangzhou, China	2011-06-18	2011-06-24	2013-04-12	2013-04-22	2013-08-29	2013-11-05			2013-11-06	2013-11-26			2010-01-12	892		2013-11-25
Victor & Sara	Ireland	Vermont	No	Ireland	2011-06-16	2011-06-24	2011-09-09	2011-09-24	2011-11-10	2011-11-17				2012-01-20			2010-08-18	218		2012-01-15