mitzab

For the K-1 process, financial scrutiny does not occur at the I129F stage, USCIS does not evaluate income or assets when adjudicating Form I-129F, so unemployment at this point is not relevant (USCIS I-129F instructions: Financial ability is reviewed later at the consular interview using Form I-134 https://www.uscis.gov/i-129f USCIS I-134 instructions: https://www.uscis.gov/i-134 read through these links at your leisure you will be able to learn a lot as well. joint sponsors are allowed, using assets alone is also valid, though assets (especially home equity) may receive closer review for valuation and liquidity. applicants in your situation proceed with assets-only (there is no data to see how many do and how many dont but they sure do) and keep a joint sponsor available as a backup if requested at the interview, which is a common and acceptable approach. (But common advice in this case is to get a sponsor involved sooner than later instead of first going through asset situation) Wishing you good luck in your journey.

The two ladders I jerry rigged were sketchy and gave up with me up there, I jumped thinking I’d land in the bushes (mainly trying to save my cranium), instead I landed on a concrete ledge from about 25 feet and both my legs immediately resigned. I work from home, so no time off… just broken legs, a laptop, and excellent medications keeping morale "high".

Since we’re sharing injury stories… I broke both my legs a couple months ago installing decorations way earlier than I should have. The universe reviewed my timing, decided I was being reckless, and issued a double-leg shutdown.

At this point your body is just running a group project and everyone’s failing.

Did you recieve a letter? What does your portal say? Did you get a call? I am positive it will be due to staffing issues or some other administrative matters. wishing you the best

how did i not know this rabbit hole existed

In our case (islamabad) our green light was the email that “Your petition has been forwarded to the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad" once we saw that and the upate on CEAC thats when we started making our moves, we had to make a payment and then work on the DS160 if I remember correctly, please note as JeanneAdil mentioned that the processes vary embassy by embassy. if I may suggest, get on the forum of the embassy you are going to be dealing with and start understanding their process (again EVERY EMBASSY WORKS DIFFERENT), it really helps going through other peoples experiences and once you have base knowledge hopefully you will be able to make the right decisions. All the best on your journey, you are almost there.

1) “refused” simply means the visa has not yet been issued and is pending further review rather than a final denial. CEAC shows “Refused” until the administrative processing is resolved and then updates to “Issued.” 2) There is no guaranteed timeline, you can check real world time on this forum if you go and search in timelines of similar cases (AP can last for months if this helps in any way) 3) there is no public source showing a specific new rule targeting EB immigrant visas in early 2026 (I tried searching case specific) but there are hundreds of examples on reddit and forums on venezuelans having their interviews canceled at the last moment etc. What I think they are following through the whole process and then stalling at the last phase (issuance) which i think is also the guidance. 4) The Department of State does not allow status inquiries until 60 days after the initiation of administrative processing. If 60 days have passed without a decision,visa applicants may attempt to independently contact the U.S. Consulate to inquire about their case, although Consulates are not always responsive to such inquiries. It is important to note that the visa application and its approval or denial is at the full discretion of the Department of State, and no outside entity has the ability to influence the speed or outcome. As such, we are unable to submit inquiries on behalf of visa applicants. (i found this on john hopkins website) https://ois.jhu.edu/travel-information/administrative-processing-and-visa-issues/ wishing you good luck

We took one for the team to create a data point, our N-400 biometrics were scheduled for today (the 6th), but since she was off yesterday, we stopped by the Dallas ASC to ask if they’d let us do it early. The gentleman at the door said "usually we dont but I will make an excepction" and let us in, we were in and out in 15 minutes. Our portal at USCIS got updated within minutes as well that "we are working on your case" Sharing in case this helps anyone else, your mileage may vary.

I went through both, I think it is just a clean update. following items I found SSA language cleaned up (or streamlined, now just provide ss number if any) they removed the part/qs where you can select if you want ssa to issue you a card. and consent is also missing. Parents name section is taken out also because of this renumbering is also done.

K-1 can be faster, but it often comes with more scrutiny, RFEs, and stress and much more costly eventually. Both work, the real question is what makes you comfortable. If speed matters most and your evidence is strong, K-1 can be fine. If peace of mind and a cleaner process matter more, CR-1 may be the better choice. So if finances are a concern and you want a more straightforward, predictable process, CR-1 may be the better fit. Also, the K-1 process itself is the same worldwide; cultural factors are mainly evaluated at the interview. Officers in Pakistan are familiar with local norms and restrictions, but that understanding usually comes with more detailed questioning rather than less scrutiny. I really want to say that I had a fool proof case (minus the fact that the lawyer I hired and then fired made it worse) and from the date of filing to her arriving to the USA was lightspeed compared to others. But still if given a chance ill go CR-1 route. This forum is full of very helpful advice (no shortcuts and no illegal advice) pour through it. Wishing you the best.

I am sure everyone knows it but i just found out that now, if your N-400 was filed on or after Dec. 12, 2022, your N-400 receipt itself gives you a 24-month automatic extension.

now only thing that can be helpful is partial ban part, but who knows what will be happening come Feb (your timeline wise)

Return before Jan 1st if at all possible is the advice I can give you. Advance Parole does not guarantee entry, as you are still seeking admission at the border and CBP based on USCIS guidelines can deny you entry and probably will.

Being from Nigeria does not bar someone from filing or being approved for naturalization. The reports about “extra vetting” don’t change eligibility to file an N-400. Naturalization is not an entry benefit it’s governed by different INA codes (which is the authority used for travel bans). So the travel-ban framework doesn’t control N-400 eligibility. Yes, we are seeing some interviews get canceled or rescheduled, but from everything I have witnessed and again I might be a little off here, that appears to be more about additional due diligence than any change in eligibility. (things are changing daily) We recently filed an N-400 ourselves, and honestly, it was probably the easiest form in the whole process. The requirements are very clear. Under the 3-year rule, you just need to show that you’ve been married to a U.S. citizen for three years, that you’ve been living together in marital union during that time, and that your spouse has been a U.S. citizen for the full three-year period. The evidence is pretty straightforward if it’s a bona fide marriage — citizenship proof, green card, joint taxes, lease or mortgage, joint bank accounts, insurance, etc. My suggestion would be to go ahead and start drafting the N-400 online. I’m almost certain you’ll be pleasantly surprised by how simple it is. And if you do get stuck, this forum and its members are an incredible resource. The only caveat I’d add is that if there’s anything questionable in his background, then it’s worth seriously considering an attorney. Otherwise, this is very doable on your own. Wishing you nothing but the best

Same here A friend submitted in the first week of December (same exact case and almost same tineline as ours) they got a reuse notice and we got an appointment It is what it is.

Just wanted to share that my wife has officially submitted her N-400 under the 3-year rule Couldn’t have got this far or done this without this community.

If she receives her K-1 visa and enters the U.S. before the ban’s effective date, that is the best-case scenario. If not, a presidential proclamation issued under INA 212 can suspend both immigrant and non-immigrant visa issuance and entry, including K-1 and IR-1/CR-1 visas for Syria from Jan 1st 2026. Marriage alone does not bypass such a ban. Utah online marriages are recognized by USCIS if legally valid and consummated, but they do not override entry restrictions. Religion has no impact on USCIS adjudications. (g) Syria (i) Syria is emerging from a protracted period of civil unrest and internal strife. While the country is working to address its security challenges in close coordination with the United States, Syria still lacks an adequate central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures. According to the Overstay Report, Syria had a B-1/B-2 visa overstay rate of 7.09 percent and a F, M, and J visa overstay rate of 9.34 percent. (ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Syria as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby fully suspended. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/restricting-and-limiting-the-entry-of-foreign-nationals-to-protect-the-security-of-the-united-states/

1. SHOULD I REACT TO THE PHYSICAL LETTER AND SEND THE USCIS WHAT THEY ARE REQUESTING OR SHOULD I IGNORE IT SINCE THEIR OWN AGENTS ARE TELLING ME THAT ACCORDING TO THEIR SYSTEM I DON'T NEED TO SEND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION? Never ignore a physical RFE (EVER) 2. THE EVIDENCE THE USCIS IS REQUESTING ARE MY TAX FILES OR IF I BELIEVE THAT I AM EXCUSED FROM FILING TAXES THEY WOULD LIKE MY EXPLANATION AND DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD SUPPORT MY EXCUSE FROM FILING; MY TAX SITUATION IS AS FOLLOWING: I HAVE NEVER FILED TAXES AS I HAVE NEVER HAD A PAID JOB SINCE I MOVED TO THE USA; I AM GETTING MONTHLY WIRE TRASNFERS FROM MY FATHER AS A GIFT SINCE I MOVED TO THE USA; THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE MONEY I RECEIVED FOR ANY OF THE YEARS IN QUESTION IS NEVER MORE THAN 16000 $ (I LIVE IN CALIFORNIA). BASED ON MY INCOME I DON'T COME ANYWHERE NEAR CLOSE TO THE AMOUNT NECESSARY FOR FILING; IF I WILL RESPOND TO THEIR LETTER I AM PLANNING TO SEND THEM BANK STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS IN QUESTIONS SHOWING THE TRANSFERS FROM MY FATHER. DO YOU THINK THAT SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT OR DO YOU THINK I DON'T NEED TO SEND MY BANK STATEMENTS AND A SIMPLE EXPLANATION WHY I AM NOT FILING SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT? Do NOT send bank statements. A clear written explanation that you were not required to file taxes is sufficient. Bank statements have nothing to do with your RFE or your situation. You should upload the additional document of explanation. Lastly, someone mentioned the best route of action is to consult a tax attorney. good luck

Chapter 6 Submitting Requests” in the USCIS Policy Manual: https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-1-part-b-chapter-6 which states that “Draft filings are generally saved … for 30 days from the last time the user worked on the request. Please remember if a new version of N-400 is released than more than likely your draft will be deleted as well and also if you are filing dor a fee waiver than you cannot apply N-400 online

I personally do not see the benefit of filing delayed AR 11 for place B, as far as my read is concerned and this is based on the fact that you stated that your wife never abandoned place A. I would file a timely AR-11 when you move permanently to C. For your I-751, just maintain proof that you always treated A as your main residence until the permanent move to C. Note: There are much experienced people here who might be able to provide you a better opinion.

Let me ask you point blank, do you have a genuine marriage? If you do, then the option is still to focus on your marriage and build proper evidence together. If your wife visits you now, use that time to gather photos, family involvement, financial records, travel records, and other proof to show your relationship is real and ongoing. A short visit (multiple) will help, but ideally, spending more time together is what will really strengthen your case. Divorce????? if you are really thinking it will be an easy fix it is absolutely not. it may create more red flags as people are suggesting here. If you don't then the premise to apply for any family based visa is null and void. I think you want to hear something from the community here, but unfortunately most of us will not give you any advice with are not per the law of the land.

Honestly, in the current situation your chances are very low. The best step may be for your wife to come live with you in Pakistan for some time so you can build enough proof before filing again. Pakistan is considered a high-fraud country, so cases here are always scrutinized more heavily. It’s not the end of the world you can still succeed if you plan properly and build the right evidence. Good luck for your upcoming journey. PS: you do not qualify for any K1 or anything like that please do not waste money and time submitting those applications.

I will answer your questions from I129F as that is my case for my wife as well. -I am divorced since Nov 24 and was in separation/divorce process originally when we met, will it affect this at all? It should not as long as you both were legally free to marry at the time of the submission of your I-129F -I hear about the timeline of k1 where recipient is not able to work, but able to come here, but being that her salary is low I’m not sure it makes a difference if she can’t work temporarily. Would she be able to attend any school on k1 or do odd jobs for cash like babysitting? Absolutely NOT, she cannot work till approval of her work permit (or green card) -if she gets k1 could she go back to Indonesia or travel to any other country during the initial 90 day period and get married there? As she wants to have family party in Indonesia -she is Muslim so if we officially marry overseas it would have to be somewhere like Singapore i assume The K‑1 visa is single entry visa, If she leaves before getting Advance Parole (or a green card), she normally cannot re-enter A K‑1 requires you to marry in the US within 90 days, If you marry abroad instead, the K‑1 route dies and you’d switch to a spousal (CR‑1/IR‑1) case. You can always Marry civilly in the U.S. for immigration, then travel for a reception once she has Advance Parole or her green card. We are also muslim, she came here we married here and had a party there and after her green card we went abroad and had a party with her family as well. I took a big chance with K1 during covid times, somehow it worked out but if given a choice now I will never go K1 route, and this is 100% based on my flawless experience of the process. I 110% blv that CR-1/IR-1 is a much stronger case, you basically hit the ground running. K-1 and CR-1 timelines are also debatable at this point in time. Good luck in your journey, we are rooting for you and hoping that you get together with your loved one sooner than later. This forum is a Godsend, go through it and you will be able to find most of the answers that you are looking for, unfortunately this forum will not be able to guide anyone on shortcuts.

yep that is what I was thinking that especially these days with signing or being forced to sign 407 real possibility