Dashinka

Stacked? It is only stacked in the eyes of the leftist MSM activists. Roberts is fairly MoR as is Gorsuch and Coney-Barrett and in some cases Kavanaugh. Sotomayor, KBJ, and Kagan are idealogues and firm leftist votes, and Thomas and Alito tend to be staunch originalists. Seems pretty balanced to me.

Seems like a very petulant leftist almost pleading for Sotomayor to take one for the team. It is interesting they are worried about her, and yet are fine with a declining 80 year old in the WH. For the sake of all of us, Sonia Sotomayor needs to retire from the US supreme court https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/01/for-the-sake-of-all-of-us-sonia-sotomayor-needs-to-retire-from-the-us-supreme-court

What about the company that employed the local river pilots?

At least Trump did not need to rely on his political influence to get rich unlike the current WH occupant who is an utterly corrupt and petulant career politician.

There are a lot of ignorant Democrats/Leftist. Just see how easily they are gaslighted by the Left MSM and the DC insiders/elite.

If you already got married, file the I485/I131/I765 as soon as you get the marriage certificate. No need to leave, and in fact you will not want to leave the US until you get either the AP card or the green card. Good Luck!

Interesting case, probably should be pinned just due to the rarity . It would have been interesting to know what caused their I130 delay, but did not impact the K3.

Not relevant since your parent is not currently in the US. Your only option is to file the I130 for regular consular processing that takes around 12-24 months. Your parents previous GC should show up in the history for USCIS, so that should not be an issue and I assume they filed an I407 when they decided to give up the GC. Your parent can use their valid visitor visa to visit (short visits are recommended) during the process at the discretion of CBP (i.e. they should not show up with all their worldly possession and important documents giving CBP reason to believe they plan on staying). You need to get familiar with the terminology. "Sponsor" is the primary sponsor (fills out an I864), "Co-sponsor" is the secondary sponsor when the Sponsor does not meet the financial requirements (they also fill out an I864 separate from the Sponsor's), and "Household Member" which is an adult person living at the same residence as the Sponsor that is willing to add their income to the Sponsor (they fill out an I864A). In your case since you are married, you can use the I864 that you will fill out and your spouse can fill out the I864A to show they are including their income to show sponsorship of an intending alien. Now the I864(s) are not needed until the NVC stage which will be in a year or so. Yes. Good Luck!

The I130 can be filed anytime for the parent of a USC. If the parent is currently in the U.S. then you can also file the I485 to adjust status. That being said, it is unclear where your parent is now as if not in the U.S. currently, then the I485 is not an option. The primary sponsor would fill out the I864, and if a co-sponsor is needed, then the co-sponsor would fill out a separate I864 except in your case, your spouse (household member) would fill out the I864A. These guides may be helpful.

Yes if the parent is already in the U.S. No if the parent is not in the U.S. as it is fraud to enter the U.S. on a visitor visa with the preconceived intent to stay and adjust status. Shouldn’t be an issue. USCIS should be able to see the past record(s). Good Luck!

In Detroit all oath ceremonies are conducted at the federal courthouse with a judge administering the oath regardless of a name change. Not all USCIS offices conduct administrative oaths.

As @Crazy Cat stated, yes. Also if you get an N400 interview notice you can upload a request for a combo interview. Depending on your local office, it may come up quickly. Also, maybe @Crazy Cat will tell his wife’s I751/N400 story. Good Luck!

With an expedited appointment at a passport agency you can get a passport same day or a few days later. When my wife naturalized we also had a trip planned less than two weeks later, we went to the passport agency in Detroit (more convenient for us than your situation), paid for premium processing, and her passport was delivered to our home 3 days later via FedEx.

There is no 90 day rule.

I cannot comment on Portland, but in Detroit my cousins had their interviews in early February, and their oath about two weeks later. Hopefully her oath will come up soon, and passport processing times is much more reasonable now. I just renewed mine with no expedite and it took less than four weeks. Good Luck!

I agree with @Crazy Cat and @jackiegringa, if you are planning on naturalizing, file the N400 assuming you meet all the requirements. My wife did that with our I751 pending just when processing of I751s were starting to crawl, and she was a citizen about the same time as others who filed near the same time were getting their 10 yr GC. Not sure about the articles, or what reasoning they are using to say wait, but it makes no sense overall. However, they are right the I751 does have to be finalized first or at the same time as the N400 which is what usually happens for those in the situation with both petitions in process. Good Luck!

That is a great point. It is no certainty that USCIS processes an I129F for a K1 or a K3 the same way.

The new fees take effect today.

One wonders if more people submit an I129F in conjunction with an I130 would USCIS push the I129Fs faster to lead to more K3’s and more AOS fees.

I thought this was interesting and free speech related. I also did an experiment running the search “Remember the San Bernardino 14” on both Bing and Google and the results were interesting. Bing’s first result was the article mentioned, and Google returned this “ It looks like there aren't many great matches for your search Try using words that might appear on the page you’re looking for. For example, "cake recipes" instead of "how to make a cake."” Progress? Google Warns Freedom Center to Censor Mentions of Islamic Terror But the Google AdSense rejection told us what we could do to make our way into the good graces of the company that dominates online search and advertising, controlling what much of the country and the world sees. All we had to do was stop talking about Islamic terrorism. According to Google AdSense, our “entire site” contained “dangerous or derogatory content”, as did David Horowitz’s writing in particular, but one of the sample pages that the company claimed contained forbidden content was an article about the San Bernardino Muslim terrorist attack. The article, “Remember The San Bernardino Fourteen” by Lloyd Billingsley, like a lot of our articles, is blocked in Google Search. The Front Page article doesn’t come up when you type in its name. It doesn’t even appear when you do a site search for the exact title in quotation marks that has been entirely limited to the Front Page Magazine site. That means that Google likely specifically excluded it. And it’s far from the only one of our articles banned by Google. https://www.frontpagemag.com/google-warns-freedom-center-to-censor-mentions-of-islamic-terror/

Hmm, a bunch of bureaucrats going after food production. I guess they fell safe sort of like KJU. The fury of Europe’s farmers All of this has been done with the approval and encouragement of the EU. And there is worse to come in the Netherlands and beyond. The absurd nitrogen rules that are threatening Dutch farms come from an EU environmental directive that dates back to the 1990s. But the EU’s eco-mania has intensified massively since then. Farmers now have to contend with the drive to Net Zero, too. According to Laurence Tubiana, chief executive of the European Climate Foundation and the architect of the Paris Climate accords, Net Zero will require ‘the biggest overhaul of farming since the Second World War’. And yet, once again, farmers haven’t been consulted on this. Targets have simply been drawn up by the technocrats and rubber stamped by national governments, without any consideration for their impact on farmers and their ability to produce food. Under the EU’s so-called Green Deal, every EU member state has to reach Net Zero carbon emissions by 2050. And the EU’s emissions rules for agriculture are especially, insanely, stringent. The punishing green policies don’t stop there, either. The Farm to Fork strategy, announced in 2020, calls for 10 per cent of farmland to be set aside for non-agricultural use. It says that at least a quarter of EU farms should become organic. It says fertiliser use must fall by 20 per cent. Pesticide use must be cut by 50 per cent. And all of this should be done by 2030. Each of these demands would be enough to put thousands of farms out of business on their own. When combined, they pose an existential threat to European agriculture. And if the EU’s laws weren’t bad enough, member states are actually gold plating these regulations. The EU had already demanded the impossible of farmers. Now national elites in Berlin, Paris and The Hague want to go even further. This is why farmers are out on the streets across the continent. It’s why they’re taking matters into their own hands. It’s why they feel they have no choice but to block roads with their tractors, bring life to a standstill and dowse public buildings with manure. They are determined to remind the powers-that-be just how essential they are to the functioning of modern life. At first, the elites tried to dismiss the protests. They resorted to their usual playbook. They called the farmers fascists, far right and pawns of online disinformation. But this propaganda campaign has flopped. Not only have these smears failed to demoralise the farmers, they have also failed to turn the public against the protests. In country after country, European peoples are backing their farmers, even as the protests disrupt daily life. https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/04/01/the-fury-of-europes-farmers/

We all know who will pay.

More from the leftist activist “journalists” at the Peacock network. So the Judges daughter is an adult and a rabid Democrat political activist, no conflict of interest here. MSNBC host Nicole Wallace defiantly throws her script in reaction to Trump calling out judge's daughter: 'We're not going to have this conversation again!' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13257369/MSNBC-host-throws-script-Trump-judge-daughter.html

If he is a green card holder and has to leave the U.S. for two years, he can apply for a re-entry permit prior to leaving.

You should be fine as the absence was less than 6 months. Good Luck!