Jump to content

62 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Thrilled for you, Brother -- what a release of tension for you.  Fingers crossed that December 15 plays out.

Thank you, Brother. This journey has been a long one… and honestly, it’s taken a lot out of me. My only question now is whether my wife and daughter will get a 3-year or 5-year green card — but at this point, I’m just grateful we’re finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.

The stress has been real. Unless you’ve been through it, it’s hard to explain the emotional weight this process puts on you. If I could tell anyone one thing, it would be this: don’t ever put yourself in a position where you end up in removal proceedings. Even if your case is strong, even if you have faith you’ll win, the toll it takes on you and your family is something I wouldn’t wish on anyone.

But through it all, God’s been good. And I’m just thankful we’re still standing. 🙏🏽💪🏽

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
7 hours ago, Gary Rich said:

through it all, God’s been good. And I’m just thankful we’re still standing.

Both.  Stand even taller!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
7 hours ago, Gary Rich said:

The stress has been real. Unless you’ve been through it, it’s hard to explain the emotional weight this process puts on you.  [...]  Even if your case is strong, even if you have faith you’ll win, the toll it takes on you and your family is something I wouldn’t wish on anyone.

Isn't this the truth.  I'm still spittin' mad at the [censored] Guayaquil consulate, 17 years later.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
On 11/6/2025 at 11:56 PM, TBoneTX said:

Thrilled for you, Brother -- what a release of tension for you.  Fingers crossed that December 15 plays out.

Good Morning
(Here’s a little joke to start the day.)

Over the weekend, my daughter and I were on our way to the store, talking about what happened at the court hearing. She looked at me and said,

“Dad, the judge said I don’t have to be in court next month.”

I said, “Yes.”

Then she said, “That means we’re going to win!”

I laughed and said, “More than likely, you will win.”

She smiled big and said, “GOOD!” 😄

Posted
On 11/7/2025 at 9:12 AM, Gary Rich said:

My only question now is whether my wife and daughter will get a 3-year or 5-year green card


As said above, these don’t exist. If things happen quite quickly after the hearing then it’ll be a 2 year conditional GC as you’ll have been married less than 2 years at that point. 
 

Best of luck to you. 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
10 minutes ago, Gary Rich said:

(Important Update)

Good morning. As some of you are aware, my wife and I appeared in court yesterday regarding her immigration matter.

We traveled approximately two hours to Northern Virginia, departing our home at 7:30 a.m. for a scheduled 10:30 a.m. hearing. We arrived at the courthouse at approximately 9:30 a.m., completed security screening, and proceeded to the courtroom.

Upon arrival, we were instructed to wait for our attorney. She arrived at approximately 10:00 a.m. This was our first in-person meeting, as her office is located in Northern Virginia. After a brief introduction, counsel entered the courtroom to notify the court of our presence.

Counsel later advised us that there would be a delay of approximately 20–30 minutes due to the judge presiding over another matter. After that period, we were called into the courtroom.

My wife, our attorney, and I appeared before the court. The judge requested identification from the respondent and entered appearances for both parties. From the outset, the judge appeared focused and attentive, particularly in addressing government counsel.

The judge then called my wife to the witness stand, where she was sworn in. The court questioned our attorney regarding the completion of background and security checks for my wife and our daughter before they entered into the United States. The judge reviewed the records in detail and directed government counsel to review the same documentation.

Government counsel was then allowed to question my wife. The questions posed were limited in number and scope, and all directly reflected information already contained in the Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

Following this examination and review of the record, the judge rendered an oral decision. The court stated:

“I grant your Adjustment of Status, effective immediately.”

At that moment, my wife was released from the witness stand, and we embraced, overwhelmed with relief, as the court acknowledged the ruling.

The judge further stated on the record that he regretted that this case had proceeded to court, noting that it could have been resolved administratively with minimal effort. He admonished government counsel against bringing unnecessary matters before the court.

The judge then advised my wife that if her Permanent Resident Card is not received within a few weeks, she should contact her attorney, who may then contact the court directly. The proceedings concluded with the judge offering congratulations and an apology for the undue burden imposed by the case.

We are profoundly grateful and relieved. The matter has been resolved, and justice was served. (We were told by our lawyer she will email us the judges decison as soon as possible, just to have )

image.jpeg.605329876cf40bf779d4eeb704aa934e.jpeg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Taiwan
Timeline
Posted
10 minutes ago, Gary Rich said:

(Important Update)

Good morning. As some of you are aware, my wife and I appeared in court yesterday regarding her immigration matter.

We traveled approximately two hours to Northern Virginia, departing our home at 7:30 a.m. for a scheduled 10:30 a.m. hearing. We arrived at the courthouse at approximately 9:30 a.m., completed security screening, and proceeded to the courtroom.

Upon arrival, we were instructed to wait for our attorney. She arrived at approximately 10:00 a.m. This was our first in-person meeting, as her office is located in Northern Virginia. After a brief introduction, counsel entered the courtroom to notify the court of our presence.

Counsel later advised us that there would be a delay of approximately 20–30 minutes due to the judge presiding over another matter. After that period, we were called into the courtroom.

My wife, our attorney, and I appeared before the court. The judge requested identification from the respondent and entered appearances for both parties. From the outset, the judge appeared focused and attentive, particularly in addressing government counsel.

The judge then called my wife to the witness stand, where she was sworn in. The court questioned our attorney regarding the completion of background and security checks for my wife and our daughter before they entered into the United States. The judge reviewed the records in detail and directed government counsel to review the same documentation.

Government counsel was then allowed to question my wife. The questions posed were limited in number and scope, and all directly reflected information already contained in the Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

Following this examination and review of the record, the judge rendered an oral decision. The court stated:

“I grant your Adjustment of Status, effective immediately.”

At that moment, my wife was released from the witness stand, and we embraced, overwhelmed with relief, as the court acknowledged the ruling.

The judge further stated on the record that he regretted that this case had proceeded to court, noting that it could have been resolved administratively with minimal effort. He admonished government counsel against bringing unnecessary matters before the court.

The judge then advised my wife that if her Permanent Resident Card is not received within a few weeks, she should contact her attorney, who may then contact the court directly. The proceedings concluded with the judge offering congratulations and an apology for the undue burden imposed by the case.

We are profoundly grateful and relieved. The matter has been resolved, and justice was served. (We were told by our lawyer she will email us the judges decison as soon as possible, just to have )

That is great news!!!!!!  Thank you for sharing this.  I wish the process had not gone to this length.......

"The US immigration process requires a great deal of knowledge, planning, time, patience, and a significant amount of money.  It is quite a journey!"

- Some old child of the 50's & 60's on his laptop 

 

Senior Master Sergeant, US Air Force- Retired (after 20+ years)- Missile Systems Maintenance & Titan 2 ICBM Launch Crew Duty (200+ Alert tours)

Registered Nurse- Retired- I practiced in the areas of Labor & Delivery, Home Health, Adolescent Psych, & Adult Psych.

IT Professional- Retired- Web Site Design, Hardware Maintenance, Compound Pharmacy Software Trainer, On-site go live support, Database Manager, App Designer.

______________________________________

In summary, it took 13 months for approval of the CR-1.  It took 44 months for approval of the I-751.  It took 4 months for approval of the N-400.   It took 172 days from N-400 application to Oath Ceremony.   It took 6 weeks for Passport, then 7 additional weeks for return of wife's Naturalization Certificate.. 
 

Posted
4 minutes ago, OldUser said:

Congratulations @Gary Rich!

Thank you for your kind words, and thank you to VJ as well for all the support I’ve received throughout the years. Although my wife and I still have a journey ahead of us, I’m grateful that this part of the process is now behind us.

On a side note, my wife misses her mother and father very much. On our way home, she called them to share the news, and now we are trying to make plans for her to travel back home to see her elderly parents.

During her time here, my wife was unable to attend her grandmother’s funeral, which was a crushing blow for us.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
Posted
On 11/7/2025 at 4:36 PM, TBoneTX said:

Isn't this the truth.  I'm still spittin' mad at the [censored] Guayaquil consulate, 17 years later.

and I am still upset with the whole process after our 6 year ordeal 

been married now a few months short of 16 years

 

i do understand some issues like big age gap but why do some (really weak cases) fly thru the system

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...