Jump to content
Sam Burns

Has a congressperson or senator actually helped you in 2021?

 Share

26 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Poland
Timeline

I keep hearing advice to contact your senator and/or congressperson but has doing that actually helped anyone here?

I reached out to my congressperson and filled out the forms, talked to their contact on the phone and then never heard anything again. I emailed them three times, the last time just this week and they never responded at all.

So that’s my question, did doing this make a difference for you? If so please let us know here.

thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Thread is moved from the K-1 Process forum to General Immigration Discussion -- topic applies to many visa types.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Brazil
Timeline

I'm curious to know as well, the way people on here talk about it, they make it seem like its a done deal once they bring out the congressman/Senator statement😅 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
54 minutes ago, Sam Burns said:

has doing that actually helped anyone here?

In 2008, when Mrs.-T-B.-to-be's attempt to be granted her K-1 visa was hosed twice by the evil, incompetent, mismanaged, [censored] Guayaquil consulate, I reached out in desperation to my Congressman's office.

 

The immigration liaison was unable to help mechanically (Congressman are precluded by statute from intervening directly with consulates, and in fact not even a President has influence over consulates); however, he explained things patiently and sympathetically to me, and I consequently felt a lot less tormented.  I remember that Congressional experience with undying gratitude.

 

Congressional offices can indeed gain answers about petition progress from USCIS, which is required to respond to Congressional inquiries.  The exception is security checks during Administrative Processing, which is such an opaque process that not even the consular officers themselves know the status.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Poland
Timeline
41 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Thread is moved from the K-1 Process forum to General Immigration Discussion -- topic applies to many visa types.

For what it’s worth I should have added that I was specifically interested in the K1 only in 2021 just because of the doubling of the processing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline

it really depends on what help u need

they can ask at what stage is your petition ?

same answers u would get from USCIS 

 

also ask "will my congressman go out on a limb for my vote if its an election year"

 

a few say senator has helped but most say the office only provided info on case status 

 

read what boundless says about congressional help and remember the decision to grant a visa lies with the CO and embassy or US immigration officer in the US if doing AOS here

 

https://www.boundless.com/blog/how-to-contact-your-representative-to-speed-up-your-visa-processing-time/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
2 minutes ago, Sam Burns said:

I was specifically interested in the K1 only in 2021 just because of the doubling of the processing time.

I figured so; your excellent question pertains to many visa types. :) 

 

The doubled time adds further unpleasantry to this infernal process.  Before the consular hosing, I had called the same Congressman's office about the status of my I-129F petition, which was behind the prevailing processing time.  The same immigration liaison said straight out to me, "USCIS is our very worst Federal agency."

 

For an overview of what happened with me, see this thread:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/410945-k-1-journey-completed/

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
8 minutes ago, JeanneAdil said:

"will my congressman go out on a limb for my vote if its an election year"

This too is a good question.  If the Congressman cares about being engaged with voters, he/she will do everything possible to help -- and the better ones will do this even when it's not an election year.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Poland
Timeline
8 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

I figured so; your excellent question pertains to many visa types. :) 

 

The doubled time adds further unpleasantry to this infernal process.  Before the consular hosing, I had called the same Congressman's office about the status of my I-129F petition, which was behind the prevailing processing time.  The same immigration liaison said straight out to me, "USCIS is our very worst Federal agency."

 

For an overview of what happened with me, see this thread:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/410945-k-1-journey-completed/

A wonderful read, thank you for sharing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
9 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

In 2008, when Mrs.-T-B.-to-be's attempt to be granted her K-1 visa was hosed twice by the evil, incompetent, mismanaged, [censored] Guayaquil consulate, I reached out in desperation to my Congressman's office.

 

The immigration liaison was unable to help mechanically (Congressman are precluded by statute from intervening directly with consulates, and in fact not even a President has influence over consulates); however, he explained things patiently and sympathetically to me, and I consequently felt a lot less tormented.  I remember that Congressional experience with undying gratitude.

 

Congressional offices can indeed gain answers about petition progress from USCIS, which is required to respond to Congressional inquiries.  The exception is security checks during Administrative Processing, which is such an opaque process that not even the consular officers themselves know the status.

Same with me 

Congress is mainly made up of lawyers

and their aids are either lawyers also or studying Politcial Science and / or law

 

They can explain the rules and laws of Immigration and the rules they have to abide by

this is what boundless says

to understand the rules, laws,  process and embassies (as they are different) is important

 

My Senator liaise wrote a  letter (which i was not privy to see) to the embassy on our 3rd petition to support our cause

but i had K1 denied

CR1 denied

appeal approve by immigration court 

and 3rd interview granted visa

this is with 6 years of proofs

so,  was it the Senators'  letter that helped or all my evidence and my quality time spent with husband and his family?

 

one thing i do know is "it can't hurt to try"

and make congress aware of immigration issues (legal immigration ) as they are more concerned with illegals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
9 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

This too is a good question.  If the Congressman cares about being engaged with voters, he/she will do everything possible to help -- and the better ones will do this even when it's not an election year.

Senator here holds town house meetings

and twice a year they meet with persons having issues with government agencies

(IRS,  USCIS,  TVA, even  the state agencies like health care)

the office looks at evidence and  works to settle individual problems

 

so,  if u get a call from congress office asking u to take part in town house meetings ,   don't ignore it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
36 minutes ago, JeanneAdil said:

if u get a call from congress office asking u to take part in town house meetings ,   don't ignore it

I had just returned from the [censored] Stokes interview on July 1.  The Congressman was holding a town hall meeting on July 3.  I wasn't feeling very patriotic.

 

When the Congressman opened the floor for questions, someone said, "What are you going to do about immigration?"  The C. replied, "Are you asking about legal immigration or illegal immigration?" I began to cheer up, thinking, "This guy GETS it!"  I had a chance to explain my situation and to thank the C.'s staff in public.  The immigration liaison himself wasn't there after having served at the previous day's town hall, but I made sure that everyone knew how helpful he was.

 

Jeanne is right -- town halls enable you to describe your situation AND to express appreciation.  Congressmen (well, most) are human beings and appreciate positive feedback.

47 minutes ago, Sam Burns said:

A wonderful read, thank you for sharing 

You're welcome, and thank you for saying so.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

I was promptly helped each time I reached out (2017, Michael Bennet's Office, AOS; 2020, Cory Booker's Office then Bernie Sanders' Office, N400/I751; 2020, Nancy Pelosi's office, US Passport). 

Timeline:

Spoiler

AOS Journey:

Spoiler

 

08/19/2016 - day 0 - I-485, I-130, I-765 sent to USCIS office in Chicago (PD: 08/23/2016)

08/31/2016 - day 9 - electronic NOAs received via text and email, check is cashed.

09/08/2016 - day 17 - biometrics appointment notice received in the mail (appointment date 09/19/2016).

09/13/2016 - day 22 - early biometrics walk in.

10/28/2016 - day 67 - EAD status changed to "New Card Is Being Produced".

11/16/2016 - day 87 - EAD card received in mail.

06/27/2017 - day 309 - contacted the congressman office.

07/28/2017 - day 340 - finally received an interview appointment in mail (online status has not changed).

08/31/2017 - day 374 - Interview; I-485 status changed to 'New Card Is Being Produced'

09/08/2017 - day 382 - greencard received in mail

I-751 & N400 Journey:

Spoiler

06/20/2019 - day 1036 - ROC packet mailed (PD: 06/21/2019)

06/29/2019 - day 1045 - NOA/Extension letter received in the mail (new GC expiration date is 2/28/2021)

01/17/2020 - day 1256 - biometrics appointment

06/03/2020 - day 1382 - N400 filed online (PD: 06/04/2020)

02/01/2021 - day 1626 - Biometric Reuse notice uploaded to my online account

02/08/2021 - day 1634 - Interview Appointment notice uploaded to my online account

03/16/2021 - day 1670 - N400 Interview - passed; due to I-751 stuck in another office 'No decision can be made at this time'

06/01/2021 - day 1747 - with help of Sen. Sanders' office, I-751 file finally forwarded to St. Albans field office

06/28/2021 - day 1774 - I-751 status changed to 'New Card is Being Produced'; N400 status changed to 'Oath Ceremony Will Be Scheduled'

08/19/2021 - day 1826 (exactly 5 years since day 0) - Oath Ceremony (notice received on 7/19/21)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

What are you looking them to do

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Poland
Timeline
37 minutes ago, Boiler said:

What are you looking them to do

Well in the K1 forums when people ask about getting help with delays or any other issues etc they are told to get in touch with their congressperson/senator.

 

Hence my question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...