Jump to content

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

So Time Magazine came out with a piece today basically admitting to how they changed oh sorry "fortified" the election in favor for Biden. But we get called conspiracy theorists for thinking that something wasn't right with the election. 
 

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign




Image

Posted

   I know we can't post the whole article, but you didn't post an admission of anything. The highlighted part you posted is saying even though it sounds like that's what happened, it didn't.

 

  As we see from the following excerpt, Trump's attempts at subverting the election didn't actually come as a surprise, and many were ready for it. 

 

Quote

The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. 

 

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Posted
35 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

   I know we can't post the whole article, but you didn't post an admission of anything. The highlighted part you posted is saying even though it sounds like that's what happened, it didn't.

 

  As we see from the following excerpt, Trump's attempts at subverting the election didn't actually come as a surprise, and many were ready for it. 

 

 

Just try being objective please and read the article. 

Posted
On 2/5/2021 at 12:57 PM, Steeleballz said:

 

    I did. Which is why I found it strange that you chose to highlight that specific section for emphasis. That wasn't very objective.

So what do you call it when poll workers in an election are recruited in a conspiracy to produce a "proper outcome" of an election?

Posted
1 minute ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  The proper outcome of an election is that voters decide the next president. Only one guy was actively trying to prevent that from happening and you know who he is. 

Sorry the only thing I see is a big cabal conspiring against Trump. At least that is what the NYT said

Posted
On 2/5/2021 at 11:21 AM, Steeleballz said:

   I know we can't post the whole article, but you didn't post an admission of anything. The highlighted part you posted is saying even though it sounds like that's what happened, it didn't.

 

  As we see from the following excerpt, Trump's attempts at subverting the election didn't actually come as a surprise, and many were ready for it. 

Next time I am in Vegas I will just try to fortify my bets to ensure that the end turns out how I want it to be

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

See new thread "Our Animal Farm," which refers to the Time article.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...