Jump to content
abum

AP Fact Check: Trump's fact-challenged week over impeachment

 Share

88 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
3 minutes ago, abum said:

 

Anything about me saying (the "strawman i was accused of") which @Bill & Katya tried to misrepresent what i wrote above?

has i said anything about anyone committing perjury? or should be charged with it? do quote me on that and show me how i had said that.

 

 

 

16 minutes ago, abum said:

Kinda hard to have a mature discussion, somehow people can grasp that LIE is bad, and what OATH is about, what PERJURY is, but yet, they will happily support someone who is well known, with established evidence, that lies majority of the time. 

The counter argument is "all of them lies, so i will support the one that lies the most"

do quote me verbatim that where i said that.

So what was your insinuation here?  I mean you took the time to capitalize perjury and all.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
9 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

 

So what was your insinuation here?  I mean you took the time to capitalize perjury and all.

it is just as what i had said. Still, I can write in logical points format that might help you understand . Here is my attempt.

 

1. LIE is bad (if you agree proceed to the following points, if you disagree, stop reading ).

2. We ask people to swear/take an OATH 

3. PERJURY is LYING under OATH. 

 

See the connection of LYING and PERJURY? If you got that, then here is the point:

 

Okay, so now, if we could not care less about LIES, and politicians who LIE, especially one that LIES majority of the time, why would we be bothered so much about PERJURY? just abolish PERJURY, and abolish OATHs that would allow PERJURY to happen, since we can live with LIES. Maybe we should also push for more people to LIE, since TRUTHS carry no meaning, as we can live with LIES.

Find spouse that lies a lot, teach our kids to lie, as they will surely make great politicians that we will vote in the future, to emulate our favorite leader. To prepare them as the next breed of leader to replace the well known liar that we support right now. 

Edited by abum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
7 minutes ago, abum said:

it is just as what i had said. Still, I can write in logical points format that might help you understand . Here is my attempt.

 

1. LIE is bad (if you agree proceed to the following points, if you disagree, stop reading ).

2. We ask people to swear/take an OATH 

3. PERJURY is LYING under OATH. 

 

See the connection of LYING and PERJURY? If you got that, then here is the point:

 

Okay, so now, if we could not care less about LIES, and politicians who LIE, especially one that LIES majority of the time, why would we be bothered so much about PERJURY? just abolish PERJURY, and abolish OATHs that would allow PERJURY to happen, since we can live with LIES. Maybe we should also push for more people to LIE, since TRUTHS carry no meaning, as we can live with LIES.

Find spouse that lies a lot, teach our kids to lie, as they will surely make great politicians that we will vote in the future, to emulate our favorite leader. To prepare them as the next breed of leader to replace the well known liar that we support right now. 

You missed the fact that perjury involves a court of law.  If perjury was charges for lying based on a political oath, well see the earlier argument.  

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

You missed the fact that perjury involves a court of law.  If perjury was charges for lying based on a political oath, well see the earlier argument.  

and you missed the point even after i showed a logical train of thought to follow, with a conclusion..............................................

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
3 minutes ago, abum said:

and you missed the point even after i showed a logical train of thought to follow, with a conclusion..............................................

 

Logical?  It seems like TDS.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
49 minutes ago, abum said:

Kinda hard to have a mature discussion, somehow people can grasp that LIE is bad, and what OATH is about, what PERJURY is, but yet, they will happily support someone who is well known, with established evidence, that lies majority of the time. 

 

thank you for proving my point!!!! :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
7 hours ago, abum said:

nah, just those who support a well known liar , when majority of the statements made are proven to be lies, and yet ignorant deluded supporters would find ways to justify the lies made. nice try there... :) 

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

It's a shame Trump can't be more honest like Obama was, eh?  :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
5 hours ago, abum said:

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

 

"The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove."

 

 

i think i have missed you making a concrete case with evidence that to prove the following statement

"
Like I said, it has nothing to do with who lies the most since they all do", "Like I said, they all lie, "

 

Just because you said it, doesn't make it true, same with what Trump said (and he has been proven to lie by making baseless accusations)

And you need to read and really really understand what "ad-hominem" is about before accusing of someone using it on you.


"you have not proven that President Trump’s lies are any worse than any other politician, or even our previous president" <--- did not say Trump's lies are any worse. Read again what i had said

Only an idiot would attempt to make the argument that some politicians don't lie.  I know I can't think of a single one.  As for you wanting Bill to prove it, all you need to do is a tiny bit of searching to uncover a metric ton of lies by all politicians on both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
5 hours ago, abum said:

Kinda hard to have a mature discussion, somehow people can grasp that LIE is bad, and what OATH is about, what PERJURY is, but yet, they will happily support someone who is well known, with established evidence, that lies majority of the time. 

The counter argument is "all of them lies, so i will support the one that lies the most"

do quote me verbatim that where i said that.

So you WEREN'T  referring to Trump when you made this statement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess those wanting to impeach Trump over one phone call are the same ones who said Hilary’s 30,000 emails were no big deal. 

Timeline in brief:

Married: September 27, 2014

I-130 filed: February 5, 2016

NOA1: February 8, 2016 Nebraska

NOA2: July 21, 2016

Interview: December 6, 2016 London

POE: December 19, 2016 Las Vegas

N-400 filed: September 30, 2019

Interview: March 22, 2021 Seattle

Oath: March 22, 2021 COVID-style same-day oath

 

Now a US citizen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, ALFKAD said:

Only an idiot would attempt to make the argument that some politicians don't lie.  I know I can't think of a single one.  As for you wanting Bill to prove it, all you need to do is a tiny bit of searching to uncover a metric ton of lies by all politicians on both sides.

The funny thing is that I did actually provide a couple of examples of other prominent politicians lying which were all but ignored.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

So many people make the mistake of interpreting all of the President's words literally, rather than metaphorically.  This is what his supporters readily understand whereas his detractors do not.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
7 hours ago, ALFKAD said:

So you WEREN'T  referring to Trump when you made this statement?

 

Read this:

 

12 hours ago, abum said:

Kinda hard to have a mature discussion, somehow people can grasp that LIE is bad, and what OATH is about, what PERJURY is, but yet, they will happily support someone who is well known, with established evidence, that lies majority of the time. 

The counter argument is "all of them lies, so i will support the one that lies the most"

 

Then read this:

 

12 hours ago, abum said:

it is just as what i had said. Still, I can write in logical points format that might help you understand . Here is my attempt.

 

1. LIE is bad (if you agree proceed to the following points, if you disagree, stop reading ).

2. We ask people to swear/take an OATH 

3. PERJURY is LYING under OATH. 

 

See the connection of LYING and PERJURY? If you got that, then here is the point:

 

Okay, so now, if we could not care less about LIES, and politicians who LIE, especially one that LIES majority of the time, why would we be bothered so much about PERJURY? just abolish PERJURY, and abolish OATHs that would allow PERJURY to happen, since we can live with LIES. Maybe we should also push for more people to LIE, since TRUTHS carry no meaning, as we can live with LIES.

Find spouse that lies a lot, teach our kids to lie, as they will surely make great politicians that we will vote in the future, to emulate our favorite leader. To prepare them as the next breed of leader to replace the well known liar that we support right now. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...