Previous spouse.

[Going through 5,668]

Country of origin can sometimes be an added factor in the level of scrutiny you'll receive.....What is your country of origin?

 

The timeline will probably raise some eyebrows with the CO...it may appear that the divorce from 2nd wife, continuous relationship with you, and then re-marrying you overlaps somewhat...COs tend to frown upon that as it will seem to them that his intention all along was to bring his "real" wife/family to the US.

[carmel34 3,531]

A big red flag to overcome here because of the appearance of an immigration plan using a USC as the pawn.  Expect scrutiny, which you might be able to overcome with lots of time spent together since your second marriage.  How much time have you spent together, face to face, since the second marriage?

[jdaveh 58]

Looks like Kenya is the country of origin from OP s profile. expect heavy scrutiny. How long was he divorced before remarrying you ?

[Nitas_man 3,100]

🍺🍿

[dandk 72]

A similar case like this,

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/jury-convicts-jamaican-national-naturalization-fraud

 

And the appellate court agreed with the lower court decision.

 

http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/files/201813147.pdf

 

 

[Timona 3,941]

4 hours ago, jdaveh said:

Looks like Kenya is the country of origin from OP s profile. expect heavy scrutiny. How long was he divorced before remarrying you ?

Mmmmm. 😔

3 hours ago, Nitas_man said:

🍺🍿

🍹🍰

[JFH 12,189]

Likely they will look through the social media activity of the two to see if they were in communication during the petitioner’s second marriage. 

 

Also, I’m interested in how he met the USC who became his second wife. The OP has been vague on this point. So they met in the US but under what visa was he here? 

[SusieQQQ 11,584]

4 hours ago, dandk said:

A similar case like this,

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/jury-convicts-jamaican-national-naturalization-fraud

 

And the appellate court agreed with the lower court decision.

 

http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/files/201813147.pdf

 

 

I’d remembered a similar case but couldn’t find the link, thank you. 

It seems the push for revocation of citizenship around fake marriages has focused on the organized “rings”, but certainly when an individual case falls into USCIS’s lap like the one you quote above, they won’t ignore it. 

Of course, if the marriage to the USC was totally genuine, no one has anything to worry about.

 

Edited January 13, 2019 by SusieQQQ