Jump to content
techmedic

Bringing Mother In Law on B1/2

 Share

48 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

One of the big advantages of being a Grandparent is that you get to give them back.

 

If you can not, then that is work.

 

I have done both and know the difference.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country:
Timeline
1 hour ago, NuestraUnion said:

It can be considered work. And relatives have been denied entry for it before.

http://www.cleveland.com/travel/index.ssf/2015/08/babysitter_versus_the_border_p.html

 

 

Welcome to America where there is a fee for everything and everything is considered labor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Thread is moved from Bringing Family Members of USCs forum to the Tourist Visas forum.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Australia
Timeline

The easiest way to solve this is for @Italian_in_NYC to provide a link to the statute they have read stating that a grandparent taking care of a child on a US Tourist Visa isn't work.  The OP can then use said statute during the interview when his mother-in-law honestly states that she is coming to help with the new baby.

 

I think knowing this statute would also help out many others on this board who have made similar posts in the past but for which there has been no clear answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Italy
Timeline
2 hours ago, EmilyW said:

The easiest way to solve this is for @Italian_in_NYC to provide a link to the statute they have read stating that a grandparent taking care of a child on a US Tourist Visa isn't work.  The OP can then use said statute during the interview when his mother-in-law honestly states that she is coming to help with the new baby.

 

I think knowing this statute would also help out many others on this board who have made similar posts in the past but for which there has been no clear answer.

It's not a USCIS statute, I think it was from the DOL, but I can't find it.

I remember analyzing it for a tax case a while ago. It said that caring for a parent or a child (your parent and/or your child, obviously) is not considered work, hence no payroll taxes could be withheld.

AOS:

RD: 6/21/06

Biometrics: 7/25/06

ID: 10/24/06 - Approved

Conditional GC Received: 11/3/06

I-751

RD: 7/31/08

NOA 1: 8/6/08

Biometrics: 8/26/08

Transferred to CSC: 2/25/09

Approved: 4/23/09 (email received)

Card mailed: 4/28/09 (email received)

Card Received: 5/1/09

N-400

RD & PD: 7/28/09

NOA 1: 8/1/09

Biometric appt: 8/12/09

Interview Letter received: 10/02/09 (notice dated 09/29)

Interview Date: 11/10/09 at Federal Plaza in Manhattan

Oath Letter: 11/10/09

Oath Date: 11/13/09 - Special ceremony at USS Intrepid - Done - USC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Italy
Timeline
2 hours ago, EmilyW said:

The easiest way to solve this is for @Italian_in_NYC to provide a link to the statute they have read stating that a grandparent taking care of a child on a US Tourist Visa isn't work.  The OP can then use said statute during the interview when his mother-in-law honestly states that she is coming to help with the new baby.

 

I think knowing this statute would also help out many others on this board who have made similar posts in the past but for which there has been no clear answer.

I didn't say grandparent/grandchild.

I said parent/child (or child/parent). So a parent (the new grandma) caring for her child (the new mom) is not considered labor.

 

By the way - I've seen this a couple times at work - do you know that if you pay a family member (including grandparents), those expenses aren't qualified for the dependent care credit (form 2441), unless a few exceptions apply?

Sounds like a good case to bring up to Court, eventually.

AOS:

RD: 6/21/06

Biometrics: 7/25/06

ID: 10/24/06 - Approved

Conditional GC Received: 11/3/06

I-751

RD: 7/31/08

NOA 1: 8/6/08

Biometrics: 8/26/08

Transferred to CSC: 2/25/09

Approved: 4/23/09 (email received)

Card mailed: 4/28/09 (email received)

Card Received: 5/1/09

N-400

RD & PD: 7/28/09

NOA 1: 8/1/09

Biometric appt: 8/12/09

Interview Letter received: 10/02/09 (notice dated 09/29)

Interview Date: 11/10/09 at Federal Plaza in Manhattan

Oath Letter: 11/10/09

Oath Date: 11/13/09 - Special ceremony at USS Intrepid - Done - USC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Italy
Timeline
3 minutes ago, EmilyW said:

Oh ok, originally you said it was a a statute.

 

Do DOL directives apply to immigration?


If something is not considered labor by the DOL, USCIS cannot come in and deem it labor, regardless of immigration status.

 

Edited by Italian_in_NYC

AOS:

RD: 6/21/06

Biometrics: 7/25/06

ID: 10/24/06 - Approved

Conditional GC Received: 11/3/06

I-751

RD: 7/31/08

NOA 1: 8/6/08

Biometrics: 8/26/08

Transferred to CSC: 2/25/09

Approved: 4/23/09 (email received)

Card mailed: 4/28/09 (email received)

Card Received: 5/1/09

N-400

RD & PD: 7/28/09

NOA 1: 8/1/09

Biometric appt: 8/12/09

Interview Letter received: 10/02/09 (notice dated 09/29)

Interview Date: 11/10/09 at Federal Plaza in Manhattan

Oath Letter: 11/10/09

Oath Date: 11/13/09 - Special ceremony at USS Intrepid - Done - USC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Italy
Timeline
1 minute ago, EmilyW said:

So DOL directives would override USCIS?

This wouldn't be overriding.

DOL defines what is considered labor, USCIS presides over immigration laws.

Immigration laws state that you can't perform labor with a tourist visa. But I think it defers to the DOL's definition of labor.

AOS:

RD: 6/21/06

Biometrics: 7/25/06

ID: 10/24/06 - Approved

Conditional GC Received: 11/3/06

I-751

RD: 7/31/08

NOA 1: 8/6/08

Biometrics: 8/26/08

Transferred to CSC: 2/25/09

Approved: 4/23/09 (email received)

Card mailed: 4/28/09 (email received)

Card Received: 5/1/09

N-400

RD & PD: 7/28/09

NOA 1: 8/1/09

Biometric appt: 8/12/09

Interview Letter received: 10/02/09 (notice dated 09/29)

Interview Date: 11/10/09 at Federal Plaza in Manhattan

Oath Letter: 11/10/09

Oath Date: 11/13/09 - Special ceremony at USS Intrepid - Done - USC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Italy
Timeline
5 minutes ago, EmilyW said:

So the OP is good to go then.  They can use this thread as a guide as to how to navigate the interview process, using DOL's definition. 

I'll post it if I can find it.

AOS:

RD: 6/21/06

Biometrics: 7/25/06

ID: 10/24/06 - Approved

Conditional GC Received: 11/3/06

I-751

RD: 7/31/08

NOA 1: 8/6/08

Biometrics: 8/26/08

Transferred to CSC: 2/25/09

Approved: 4/23/09 (email received)

Card mailed: 4/28/09 (email received)

Card Received: 5/1/09

N-400

RD & PD: 7/28/09

NOA 1: 8/1/09

Biometric appt: 8/12/09

Interview Letter received: 10/02/09 (notice dated 09/29)

Interview Date: 11/10/09 at Federal Plaza in Manhattan

Oath Letter: 11/10/09

Oath Date: 11/13/09 - Special ceremony at USS Intrepid - Done - USC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

If childcare is not work

 

Then those doing childcare are not working

 

So any remuneration they receive is not taxable?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...