Judicial Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than Voting-Age Citizens

[Neonred 3,921]

4 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

And Florida.

Yep, Debbie Wasserman Schultz

[jg121783 3,921]

If the left was sincere about caring about the integrity of the elections and not simply engaging in a political witch hunt they would give this as much attention as the Russia nonsense. In this case there is actual evidence that warrants an investigation.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

1 minute ago, jg121783 said:

If the left was sincere about caring about the integrity of the elections and not simply engaging in a political witch hunt they would give this as much attention as the Russia nonsense. In this case there is actual evidence that warrants an investigation.

And it should be investigated. The integrity of our voting system is extremely important. 

[jg121783 3,921]

1 hour ago, spookyturtle said:

And it should be investigated. The integrity of our voting system is extremely important. 

I'm glad you see it that way but I doubt the democrats in Congress will.

[OriZ 3,165]

Seems like the MDL forgot to schedule somebody for some weekend shifts this time...

[spookyturtle 9,466]

14 minutes ago, OriZ said:

Seems like the MDL forgot to schedule somebody for some weekend shifts this time...

I don't see why anyone would be in favor of voter fraud. This needs to be checked out. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 hour ago, OriZ said:

Seems like the MDL forgot to schedule somebody for some weekend shifts this time...

There was a Temp here earlier 

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

There was a Temp here earlier 

Methinks the bridge flooded and they were washed away.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

3 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

I don't see why anyone would be in favor of voter fraud. This needs to be checked out. 

of course this is only the case in California where so many illegals congregate in sanctuary cities. You do not have voters moving away or passing in Iowa or Wisconsin because I carried those states

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Considering the tiniest of margins Dear Leader managed to win for his Electoral College victory, this indeed might be a bad scab to pick. The likelihood of proving the millions of voters Hillary Clinton won the popular vote with in enough quantity to give Tweetsolini the popular vote victory he failed to achieve and still has tantrums over isn't going to happen.

[bcking 3,157]

I wish the article actually linked to the study where they calculated the percentages.

 

The Brietbart article doesn't mention what the Judicial Watch group used as the standard for population census in each county.

 

How often does a county update its population? How does it do so? I always figured one of the ways was to look at voter registration.

 

Not saying the data is wrong, I just would like to know how they came to the percentages. Population numbers are always estimates and they suffer from some degree of possible error (say, maybe 5%?). Even assuming a 5% error on population estimate would knock out 4 of those 11 counties.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 hour ago, bcking said:

I wish the article actually linked to the study where they calculated the percentages.

 

The Brietbart article doesn't mention what the Judicial Watch group used as the standard for population census in each county.

 

How often does a county update its population? How does it do so? I always figured one of the ways was to look at voter registration.

 

Not saying the data is wrong, I just would like to know how they came to the percentages. Population numbers are always estimates and they suffer from some degree of possible error (say, maybe 5%?). Even assuming a 5% error on population estimate would knock out 4 of those 11 counties.

You are assuming the was a 'study", this is judicial watch

[bcking 3,157]

Just now, Il Mango Dulce said:

You are assuming the was a 'study", this is judicial watch

Whoever did it, they should be able to provide their methodology.

Just saying they compared voter registration to "voting age population" is not enough. They need to provide some explanation as to how they determined the population of voting age US citizens in each county.

 

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/imperialcountycalifornia,CA/PST045216

 

If they are using the census.gov data it seems like the last census was done in 2010. The July 2016 data is "population estimates".

 

So then they would be using presumably raw objective data (voting registration, which is more frequent/up to date) and comparing it to population estimates. That is going to have a pretty wide margin of error I would imagine.

 

It still wouldn't account for the larger differences, and I'm sure California has illegal immigrants registered to vote. But it would definitely cut the number of counties down substantially. 

 

Unless of course they have some other methodology for calculating voting age US citizen population by county that we don't know about.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

The assumption is also clearly being made that errors on voter rolls automatically equate to voting errors and fraudulent votes. Nope.

[Dashinka 25,898]

18 minutes ago, ready4ONE said:

The assumption is also clearly being made that errors on voter rolls automatically equate to voting errors and fraudulent votes. Nope.

Isn't the opposite assumption just as wrong?