Jump to content
JoyDee

Intimate photos/ having sex while Fiance

 Share

69 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
First, a K1 will not have a stokes interview
Educate yourself so that you don't make sweeping and false statements that can mislead others, please. This has happened and does happen. Furthermore, the COs have asked about sex.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I presume they will ask for photos together whether in mall , park or tourist resort . Acceptable photos are pics with both of u close and together . The private questions will come later after you have yr AOS interview .

-400 CITIZENSHIP TIMELINE

01-17-2015 = N-400 packet sent (to P.O. Box Dallas via USPS Priority Mail)
01-21-2015 = N-400 packet delivered
01/25/2015 = E confirmation / Text received

01/26/2015 = Check cashed .

02/02/2015 = NOA1 received (Priority Date 01/21/2015)
02/09/2015 = Biometrics Letter received .

02/18/2015 = Biometrics

02/20/2015 = In line for interview

04/10/2015 = Interview Letter received .

05/11/2015 =Interview .

05/11/2015 = Passed Interview
07/01/2015 = Oath letter received
07/24/2015 = Oath Cerememony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Educate yourself so that you don't make sweeping and false statements that can mislead others, please. This has happened and does happen. Furthermore, the COs have asked about sex.

You need to educate yourself, if a K1 never had sex, then the answer would have been no sex, and the consular would have stop the questioning. Nothing says b/c you are engaged that you should have had sex. So educate yourself, if there was no sex, than how can the conversation continue. how can a consular prove that you have had sex, if you are engaged. if you are stupid enough to answer the question if it goes beyond proper questioning than that is your fault. The consular can only assume that a CR1 has consummated their marriage.

They can ask about any damn thing, but only you can give them answers to continue the questioning. If no sex, what can they say?

Edited by LIFE'SJOURNEY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Educate yourself so that you don't make sweeping and false statements that can mislead others, please. This has happened and does happen. Furthermore, the COs have asked about sex.

You need to educate yourself, if a K1 never had sex, then the answer would have been no sex, and the consular would have stop the questioning. Nothing says b/c you are engaged that you should have had sex. So educate yourself, if there was no sex, than how can the conversation continue. how can a consular prove that you have had sex, if you are engaged. if you are stupid enough to answer the question if it goes beyond proper questioning than that is your fault. The consular can only assume that a CR1 has consummated their marriage.

They can ask about any damn thing, but only you can give them answers to continue the questioning. If no sex, what can they say?

You'll are scaring people when there is nothing to scare petitioners about, the consulars are not asking about their sex lives in detail. Show me where a Consular has gone into detail questioning of a petitioner about their sex activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-5 Country: Haiti
Timeline

This is a grown up conversation!

So I have noticed that some fiance' visa applicants are asked about having sex with their partners and are asked to produce intimate photos. While some folks do have sex, others think its bad form to have sex before marriage. This doesn't seem to vary by nation but more perhaps by religious proclivity.

How can consular officers ask about or expect that those of us in Fiance' relationships will have had sex???

And honestly my sex life is none of their business, but I'll answer the questions if it gets my fiance here. I think it borders on cruel and unusual punishment.

I agree with you. i'm from Haiti too. They wanted me to be there for a dual interview and they ask me all those kind of question. All you need to do is be honest with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
You need to educate yourself, if a K1 never had sex, then the answer would have been no sex, and the consular would have stop the questioning. Nothing says b/c you are engaged that you should have had sex. So educate yourself, if there was no sex, than how can the conversation continue. how can a consular prove that you have had sex, if you are engaged. if you are stupid enough to answer the question if it goes beyond proper questioning than that is your fault. The consular can only assume that a CR1 has consummated their marriage.

They can ask about any damn thing, but only you can give them answers to continue the questioning. If no sex, what can they say?

You'll are scaring people when there is nothing to scare petitioners about, the consulars are not asking about their sex lives in detail. Show me where a Consular has gone into detail questioning of a petitioner about their sex activities.

You've misread my answer. In post #9, you wrote "The sex question is only asked of maerried [sic] couples." No, it is not. Later, in the post that I quoted, you wrote "a K1 will not have a Stokes interview." Both of these statements are patently incorrect. Several VJ couples (K-1 and CR-1) were given Stokes interviews and questioned at length about their sex lives in Ecuador in 2008 and 2009. They most likely represent only a fraction of the total number who were asked. One's bottom dollar can be staked that the sex questions were asked at other consulates worldwide, and that K-1 couples worldwide have been given Stokes interviews. Read the various embassy/consulate reviews and the regional subfora, and if you come back with data to prove me wrong, I'll apologize. Meanwhile, stop making sweeping assertions that fly in the face of what real VJ members have actually experienced. Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you. i'm from Haiti too. They wanted me to be there for a dual interview and they ask me all those kind of question. All you need to do is be honest with them.

Please explain, what question did they ask regarding your sex activities? After they asked if you'll were sexually activity, where did it lead to? HAITAI has a Hugh Catholic population, so if you had stated that you had abstained until marriage . Do you think they would not have believed you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline

You're overthinking this stuff, tbh.

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've misread my answer. In post #9, you wrote "The sex question is only asked of maerried [sic] couples." No, it is not. Later, in the post that I quoted, you wrote "a K1 will not have a Stokes interview." Both of these statements are patently incorrect. Several VJ couples (K-1 and CR-1) were given Stokes interviews and questioned at length about their sex lives in Ecuador in 2008 and 2009. They most likely represent only a fraction of the total number who were asked. One's bottom dollar can be staked that the sex questions were asked at other consulates worldwide, and that K-1 couples worldwide have been given Stokes interviews. Read the various embassy/consulate reviews and the regional subfora, and if you come back with data to prove me wrong, I'll apologize. Meanwhile, stop making sweeping assertions that fly in the face of what real VJ members have actually experienced.

To define it as a Stokes interview, just because a couple is questioned at the Consular level with certain questions, do not constitute it as a Stokes interview. That has been my statement, again a consular cannot make the assumption that because you are engaged that you have participated in sexual activities. So, I still stand by my answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
a consular cannot make the assumption that because you are engaged that you have participated in sexual activities.
This statement is defensible and has some merit. However, I'm not talking about this statement.

You wrote (in black & white above) that "a K-1 (couple) will not have a Stokes interview." If you mean this (words mean things, and these words of yours are very clear), please provide the data behind this statement and the source for it.

You also wrote (in black & white above) that "the sex question is only asked of married couples." If you mean this, please provide the data behind this statement and the source for it.

To define it as a Stokes interview, just because a couple is questioned at the Consular level with certain questions, do not constitute it as a Stokes interview.
Look up the formal definition of a Stokes interview and paste it into your next reply. The couple is grilled separately (sometimes for hours) and is asked any infernal thing that the consul insists upon knowing. Answers that fail to match, or questions that either member of the couple refuses to answer, are black marks. This is beside the two points of yours that I've quoted (for a second time), because K-1 couples have been asked the sex questions in Stokes interviews. Is this clear yet?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Algeria
Timeline

Algeria IS a high fraud consulate. My guess is that they have no interest whatever in your personal life but it is the type of question that could have conflicting answers. Conflicting answers is a waving red flag of fraud. I have heard of interviews where they ask the applicants to draw a picture of their bedroom or their apartment or ask what side of the bed they sleep on. They don't care and it is not relevent to issuing a visa, the are checking for fraud.

The important thing is for both people to be honest. IF they ask about sex and you are not having sex, then say "No". There is no requirement to have sex before a visa is issued.

Hello, I totally agree. Honesty is the Answer. They dont care what the answer is, just as long as its honest, and not conflicting with your answer...if they happened to ask you. They are just looking for fraud.I agree that they have no interest in anyones personal life, they are just trying to connect all the dots, to make a decision. :)

Thanks! I've never heard of a follow up phone interview. I am drafting my second letter of intent to marry for my fiance to bring to the interview and I'm going to put in explicit details of our first meeting (no dirty stuff!) and continued meetings, our continued intent to marry, and a request for them to call me with further questions because of the DOS travel warning in Haiti. How long of a letter do you think they will reasonably read at the interview?

The issue was not explicit photos of us doing the deed, rather even kissing photos seems like asking a bit much. I do have photos of us kissing, of us swimming together, etc. Phone records, stamped passport, you name it! I just want the interview to go well for my fiance. He's terrified as it is.

I appreciate the humor with which many of you approach this topic, however these issue do come up and have come up. As to them not asking sex questions of K1 visa applications, the link that I provided was one such interview. i didn't think they did "stokes" interviews except for CR1 and married folks who have more to prove when it comes to a marital relationship. We don't live together yet so I have no idea what side of the bed he sleeps on, nor the color of his toothbrush, etc.

They can't interrogate one man by himself so perhaps its better if I *don't* show up for the interview? Its hard to figure out how to play this game. I can't likely be there for the current interview date because I have very strong obligations with my work until mid-May and I naturally need to keep my job!

In the end if they delay the visa and make me travel there for a second interview I'll be mad! But of course i'll do it.. just another frustrating delay.

Thanks for all the input!

Hi again. For the letter of intent. I would keep it very short and simple. They have a sample of this under example forms I belive. For the timeline of your relationship. I would keep to the basics with that too. You dont want to give them something more to question you about. The more information you give them, will just give them more ammo for questioning. In my opinion anway. Just Short, sweet, and to the point. Make sure your Fiance has reviewed your timeline as well, so that you are not giving confilicting answers. We did a timeline with dates, and then gave a brief history about how we met, and how the relationship evolved. We did not go into much detail.

Hope this helps!

4/16/10- I129F Sent by Danni

4/20/10- I129F Received at VSC

4/22/10- NOA1 sent from VSC

4/26/10- NOA1 received by Danni

6/28/10- NOA2 Received by text and email at 11:32pm

6/29/10- NVC Received K1 package

7/02/10- NVC packaged K1 to send to embassy (but probably didn't ship till the 6th, due to the holiday weekend)

7/08/10- Algeria Embassy received Package sent from NVC

7/26/10- Received Packet 3 Via Email, after I called them to inquire about it.

8/15/10- Medical Exam 9 am

8/17/10 INTERVIEW!!! Resulted in Admin Review

10/04/10 Embassy Interviewed Hamza's Dad over the telephone

10/06/10 Embassy Interviewed me over the phone

11/30/10 Embassy Emailed Hamza, with approval Notice!!!!!

12/23/10 Finally Visa in hand. Took little under a month from visa approval, till issuance.

12/31/10 Hamza's Flight to the USA!

12/31/10...7:19 PM Hamza Arrived in the US! Best New Years Ever!

2/22/11 Married!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-d8faZtdOc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

Please explain, what question did they ask regarding your sex activities? After they asked if you'll were sexually activity, where did it lead to? HAITAI has a Hugh Catholic population, so if you had stated that you had abstained until marriage . Do you think they would not have believed you?

Please stop misleading people!

You are suggesting that the "correct" answer to any sex question is to say you have not had any and hope hey believe you.

This is very dangerous reasoning, and is exactly how people wind up in trouble, because as soon as you start making stuff up then you will eventually get your stories mixed up and get denied for no reason.

There is no right or wrong answer: if they ask you about sex (which according to many people on this site with personal experience they might), then just answer truthfully and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
For the letter of intent. I would keep it very short and simple. They have a sample of this under example forms I belive. For the timeline of your relationship. I would keep to the basics with that too. You dont want to give them something more to question you about. The more information you give them, will just give them more ammo for questioning. In my opinion anway. Just Short, sweet, and to the point. Make sure your Fiance has reviewed your timeline as well, so that you are not giving confilicting answers. We did a timeline with dates, and then gave a brief history about how we met, and how the relationship evolved. We did not go into much detail.
This is good general advice. If the consulate has asked for specific information, be sure to provide that.

I ended up providing three "letters of intent to marry" to the ####### Guayaquil consulate. I've always wondered whether this is a record.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...